Impact of the New WHO Guidelines on Diagnosis and Practice of Male Infertility

S. Esteves, A. Agarwal
{"title":"Impact of the New WHO Guidelines on Diagnosis and Practice of Male Infertility","authors":"S. Esteves, A. Agarwal","doi":"10.2174/1874255601103010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The World Health Organization (WHO) has established new reference values for semen characteristics in its 5th edition manual which are lower than those previously reported. Several questions arise after a careful examination of the proposed new values, especially regarding the implications of these references for diagnosis and treatment of male infertility. Despite the notable advance of using controlled studies involving couples whose time to pregnancy was less than 12 months to generate the new limits, reference studies are limited with regard to the population analyzed and the methods used for semen evaluation. As such, it seems unreasonable to assume that reference values represent global semen characteristics of fertile men as proposed in the 5 th edition WHO manual. Caution should be exercised to not over- interpret the new reference values as they may fail to accurately discriminate populations of fertile and infertile men. Properly performed semen analyses coupled with an adequate examination of the man can give valuable information related to the organs producing \"semen\", a highly complex fluid, and thus help in better understanding of the physiology of the reproductive organs and the causes of their dysfunctions. The present commentary discusses concerns related to the publication of the new reference values for semen parameters such as the impact on patient referral, diagnosis, treatment of recognized conditions such as varicocele and indications of assisted reproductive modalities. We conclude that more debate is needed before the adoption of the proposed WHO current reference values by andrology laboratories around the world. For those considering to adopt them, a better approach would be the presentation of reference values by percentiles rather than solely the lower cutoff limits. The time has come for technological developments that bring robust and cost- effective clinically useful sperm function tests to replace, at least partially, the shortcomings of routine semen analysis.","PeriodicalId":88757,"journal":{"name":"The open reproductive science journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"7-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open reproductive science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874255601103010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) has established new reference values for semen characteristics in its 5th edition manual which are lower than those previously reported. Several questions arise after a careful examination of the proposed new values, especially regarding the implications of these references for diagnosis and treatment of male infertility. Despite the notable advance of using controlled studies involving couples whose time to pregnancy was less than 12 months to generate the new limits, reference studies are limited with regard to the population analyzed and the methods used for semen evaluation. As such, it seems unreasonable to assume that reference values represent global semen characteristics of fertile men as proposed in the 5 th edition WHO manual. Caution should be exercised to not over- interpret the new reference values as they may fail to accurately discriminate populations of fertile and infertile men. Properly performed semen analyses coupled with an adequate examination of the man can give valuable information related to the organs producing "semen", a highly complex fluid, and thus help in better understanding of the physiology of the reproductive organs and the causes of their dysfunctions. The present commentary discusses concerns related to the publication of the new reference values for semen parameters such as the impact on patient referral, diagnosis, treatment of recognized conditions such as varicocele and indications of assisted reproductive modalities. We conclude that more debate is needed before the adoption of the proposed WHO current reference values by andrology laboratories around the world. For those considering to adopt them, a better approach would be the presentation of reference values by percentiles rather than solely the lower cutoff limits. The time has come for technological developments that bring robust and cost- effective clinically useful sperm function tests to replace, at least partially, the shortcomings of routine semen analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新世卫组织男性不育症诊断和实践指南的影响
世界卫生组织(世卫组织)在其第5版手册中确定了精液特征的新参考值,该参考值低于以前报道的参考值。在仔细研究了提出的新价值之后,出现了几个问题,特别是关于这些参考文献对男性不育症的诊断和治疗的影响。尽管在使用涉及怀孕时间少于12个月的夫妇的对照研究来产生新的限制方面取得了显著进展,但关于所分析的人口和用于精液评估的方法的参考研究有限。因此,假设参考值代表世界卫生组织第五版手册中提出的可生育男性的全球精液特征似乎是不合理的。应谨慎行事,不要过度解释新的参考值,因为它们可能无法准确区分有生育能力和不育的男性群体。进行适当的精液分析,加上对男子进行充分的检查,可以提供有关产生"精液"(一种高度复杂的液体)的器官的宝贵信息,从而有助于更好地了解生殖器官的生理学及其功能障碍的原因。本评论讨论与精液参数新参考值的出版有关的问题,例如对病人转诊、诊断、精索静脉曲张等公认病症的治疗和辅助生殖方式的指示的影响。我们的结论是,在世界各地的男科实验室采用世卫组织建议的现行参考值之前,需要进行更多的辩论。对于那些考虑采用这些标准的国家来说,较好的办法是按百分位数提出参考值,而不仅仅是较低的临界值。技术发展的时代已经到来,这些技术带来了强大的、成本效益高的、临床上有用的精子功能测试,至少部分地取代了常规精液分析的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genetic Variation in the Testis-Specific Poly(A) Polymerase Beta(PAPOLB) Gene Among Japanese Males Present and Active: Transglutaminases in the Virgin Rat Uterus andCervix Ultrastructural and Aneuploidy Studies in Sperm from Patients with His- tory of Consanguinity Effects of Nitric Oxide Exposure on Human Sperm Function and Apoptosis Markers Evaluation of PCNA, Caspase 3 and E-cadherin on the Ventral Prostate of Soy Treated Rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1