Combined Use of Negative Oral Contrast and Ranitidine for Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A. Natarajan, D. Phansalkar, G. Kurian, M. R., P. T., Jayaranjeetham Jayabalan
{"title":"Combined Use of Negative Oral Contrast and Ranitidine for Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"A. Natarajan, D. Phansalkar, G. Kurian, M. R., P. T., Jayaranjeetham Jayabalan","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1750138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a noninvasive imaging modality to study pancreaticobiliary tree. The primary aim of this study was to compare the image quality of MRCP obtained with the use of ferric ammonium chloride (negative oral contrast) with that of combined use of ferric ammonium chloride and ranitidine (administered orally). Secondary aim was to determine the interobserver agreement between the assessing radiologists. Materials and Methods  The study was a single-center randomized-controlled trial. The patients were randomized into two groups. One group received ranitidine orally and ferric ammonium chloride (Dexorange) and the other group received only the ferric ammonium chloride. The images were qualitatively analyzed independently by the two blinded radiologists. Two scoring systems were used for grading the diagnostic quality of the images: the gastrointestinal tract signal intensity score (range: 1–4) and the structure visibility score (range: 0–3). The mean score of contrast effect and image effect of the two groups were compared by using Mann–Whitney U test. A p- value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Interobserver agreement was studied using Cohen kappa coefficient. Results  A total of 93 patients were eligible for the study. Forty-one patients were randomly assigned to the group that received only negative oral contrast and 52 group that received both ranitidine and negative oral contrast. The mean score of the images obtained with using both ranitidine and negative oral contrast was significantly higher when compared with the other group (3.02 vs. 2.7) ( p -value = 0.018). However, there was no significant difference in mean structure visualization score of various parts of the pancreaticobiliary system. The interobserver agreement between the two readers in our study was acceptable. Conclusion  Combined use of hematinic syrup and ranitidine increases the image quality by improving the suppression of gastrointestinal fluid signal as compared with the use of only hematinic syrup as negative oral contrast.","PeriodicalId":52666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology","volume":"46 1","pages":"008 - 014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a noninvasive imaging modality to study pancreaticobiliary tree. The primary aim of this study was to compare the image quality of MRCP obtained with the use of ferric ammonium chloride (negative oral contrast) with that of combined use of ferric ammonium chloride and ranitidine (administered orally). Secondary aim was to determine the interobserver agreement between the assessing radiologists. Materials and Methods  The study was a single-center randomized-controlled trial. The patients were randomized into two groups. One group received ranitidine orally and ferric ammonium chloride (Dexorange) and the other group received only the ferric ammonium chloride. The images were qualitatively analyzed independently by the two blinded radiologists. Two scoring systems were used for grading the diagnostic quality of the images: the gastrointestinal tract signal intensity score (range: 1–4) and the structure visibility score (range: 0–3). The mean score of contrast effect and image effect of the two groups were compared by using Mann–Whitney U test. A p- value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Interobserver agreement was studied using Cohen kappa coefficient. Results  A total of 93 patients were eligible for the study. Forty-one patients were randomly assigned to the group that received only negative oral contrast and 52 group that received both ranitidine and negative oral contrast. The mean score of the images obtained with using both ranitidine and negative oral contrast was significantly higher when compared with the other group (3.02 vs. 2.7) ( p -value = 0.018). However, there was no significant difference in mean structure visualization score of various parts of the pancreaticobiliary system. The interobserver agreement between the two readers in our study was acceptable. Conclusion  Combined use of hematinic syrup and ranitidine increases the image quality by improving the suppression of gastrointestinal fluid signal as compared with the use of only hematinic syrup as negative oral contrast.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合使用口服阴性造影剂和雷尼替丁进行磁共振胆管造影:一项随机对照试验
【摘要】目的磁共振胆管造影(MRCP)是一种研究胰胆树的无创成像方式。本研究的主要目的是比较使用氯化铁铵(口服阴性造影剂)和联合使用氯化铁铵和雷尼替丁(口服)获得的MRCP图像质量。次要目的是确定评估放射科医师之间的观察者之间的一致性。材料与方法本研究为单中心随机对照试验。患者随机分为两组。一组口服雷尼替丁和氯化铁铵(右橙),另一组只口服氯化铁铵。图像由两位盲法放射科医生独立进行定性分析。采用两种评分系统对图像的诊断质量进行评分:胃肠道信号强度评分(范围:1-4)和结构可见性评分(范围:0-3)。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组对比效果和图像效果的平均得分。p值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。采用Cohen kappa系数研究观察者间的一致性。结果共93例患者符合研究条件。41例患者被随机分配到只接受阴性口服造影剂的组和52例同时接受雷尼替丁和阴性口服造影剂的组。雷尼替丁联合口服阴性造影剂组的图像平均评分明显高于对照组(3.02 vs. 2.7) (p值= 0.018)。胰胆管系统各部位的平均结构可视化评分差异无统计学意义。在我们的研究中,两个读者之间的观察者之间的一致是可以接受的。结论联合使用血液学糖浆和雷尼替丁比单独使用血液学糖浆作为阴性口服造影剂,通过改善胃肠道液体信号的抑制,提高了图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Computed Tomography Scan Correlation of Position of Appendix with Present Literature Duplication of Gallbladder Amidst Out of the Ordinary Associated Anomalies Role of Ga68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer Imaging Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Status and Future Directions Childhood Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: Acute Presentation of an Uncommon Tumor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1