The probability of the correct majority made decision

Vladimir M. Strepetov, K. Voevodskii
{"title":"The probability of the correct majority made decision","authors":"Vladimir M. Strepetov, K. Voevodskii","doi":"10.17816/TRANSSYST20195142-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: the probability of correctness of the collegial decision, which is made by a majority vote of some collective (board), consisting of an odd number of members is investigated, if the probability of correctness of the individual decision of each member of Board is known. \nМaterials and methods: Bernoulli scheme, asymptotic representation, estimation via geometric series, power series expansion, the formula of Wallis, a power scale of averages, average of Kolmogorov. \nResult: it is established, that if for each member of the board the probability of correctness of the individual decision is more than ½, then with an unlimited increase in the number of members of the Board the probability of correctness of the collegial decision tends to 1. The asymptotic representation and a number of bilateral estimates characterizing the speed of this aspiration are obtained. For heterogeneous Board (that is a Board, whose members make the right individual decision with different probability) introduced the concept of collegial average as an average characteristics, which can replaced the individual probability of each member of the board with the preservation of the probability of a collegial decision. The existence and uniqueness of the collegial average are proved. \nWe derive a collegial inequality showing that the collegial average of some a set of numbers is not less than the geometric average of the same numbers with the equality takes place in the case and only if all the numbers are equal to each other. The collegial inequality serves as an analogue and complement to known set of inequalities establishing a connection between different averages (for example, Cauchy inequality for arithmetic average and geometric average). \nConclusion: thus, the results of the study fully meet the aim of determining the probability of correctness of collegial decision taken by a majority of votes under the assumptions. As a result we obtain an asymptotic representation and bilateral estimates characterizing the rate of striving for the correct solution. For a heterogeneous board, the existence uniqueness of the concept of collegial average as an average characteristics is introduced and strictly proved, which can be replaced by an individual probability of each with preserving the probability of correctness of the collegial decision. It is established that the collegial average is not less than the geometric average. Possible applications of the results obtained can be the quantitative evaluation of election procedures and the solution of problems associated with improving the reliability of recognition of weak signals of control sensors of various transport systems, including high-speed transport systems on magnetic suspension.","PeriodicalId":100849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/TRANSSYST20195142-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: the probability of correctness of the collegial decision, which is made by a majority vote of some collective (board), consisting of an odd number of members is investigated, if the probability of correctness of the individual decision of each member of Board is known. Мaterials and methods: Bernoulli scheme, asymptotic representation, estimation via geometric series, power series expansion, the formula of Wallis, a power scale of averages, average of Kolmogorov. Result: it is established, that if for each member of the board the probability of correctness of the individual decision is more than ½, then with an unlimited increase in the number of members of the Board the probability of correctness of the collegial decision tends to 1. The asymptotic representation and a number of bilateral estimates characterizing the speed of this aspiration are obtained. For heterogeneous Board (that is a Board, whose members make the right individual decision with different probability) introduced the concept of collegial average as an average characteristics, which can replaced the individual probability of each member of the board with the preservation of the probability of a collegial decision. The existence and uniqueness of the collegial average are proved. We derive a collegial inequality showing that the collegial average of some a set of numbers is not less than the geometric average of the same numbers with the equality takes place in the case and only if all the numbers are equal to each other. The collegial inequality serves as an analogue and complement to known set of inequalities establishing a connection between different averages (for example, Cauchy inequality for arithmetic average and geometric average). Conclusion: thus, the results of the study fully meet the aim of determining the probability of correctness of collegial decision taken by a majority of votes under the assumptions. As a result we obtain an asymptotic representation and bilateral estimates characterizing the rate of striving for the correct solution. For a heterogeneous board, the existence uniqueness of the concept of collegial average as an average characteristics is introduced and strictly proved, which can be replaced by an individual probability of each with preserving the probability of correctness of the collegial decision. It is established that the collegial average is not less than the geometric average. Possible applications of the results obtained can be the quantitative evaluation of election procedures and the solution of problems associated with improving the reliability of recognition of weak signals of control sensors of various transport systems, including high-speed transport systems on magnetic suspension.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正确多数作出决定的概率
目的:研究由奇数个成员组成的集体(董事会)的多数投票作出的合议制决策的正确概率,如果每个董事会成员的个人决策的正确概率是已知的。Мaterials和方法:伯努利格式,渐近表示,通过几何级数估计,幂级数展开,沃利斯公式,平均的幂标度,Kolmogorov的平均。结果:我们确定,如果每个董事会成员的个人决策的正确概率大于1 / 2,那么随着董事会成员数量的无限增加,合议制决策的正确概率趋于1。得到了表征这种渴望速度的渐近表示和一些双边估计。对于异质董事会(即董事会成员以不同的概率做出正确的个体决策),引入合议平均的概念作为平均特征,可以用保留合议决策的概率来代替董事会各成员的个体概率。证明了大学平均的存在性和唯一性。我们推导了一个合众不等式,证明了一组数的合众平均不小于同一组数的几何平均,且只有在所有数彼此相等的情况下,合众平均才会成立。学院不等式作为一种模拟和补充已知的一组不等式,建立了不同平均数之间的联系(例如,算术平均数和几何平均数的柯西不等式)。结论:因此,研究结果完全满足在假设条件下确定多数投票作出合议决定的正确概率的目的。结果,我们得到了一个渐近表示和双边估计,表征了争取正确解的速度。对于异质董事会,引入并严格证明了合议平均概念作为平均特征的存在唯一性,在保证合议决策正确概率的前提下,可以用合议平均的个体概率代替。建立了学院平均不小于几何平均的理论基础。所获得的结果的可能应用可以是选举程序的定量评价和解决与提高识别各种运输系统(包括磁悬浮高速运输系统)控制传感器微弱信号的可靠性有关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Roundabout Metering on the Operational Performance of Roundabout: A Case Study of Jawalakhel, Nepal Optimizing Performance at Signalized Intersections through Signal Coordination in Two Intersections of Nepal A Review on the Development and Need of Bicycle Level of Service A Feasibility Study of Public Transport of Panna City Madhya Pradesh A Review on Problems Faced Due to Poor Transportation Facilities in Small Urban Cities in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1