Reperfusion Delay and its Main Correlates in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction under Primary PCI

A. Sadrzadeh
{"title":"Reperfusion Delay and its Main Correlates in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction under Primary PCI","authors":"A. Sadrzadeh","doi":"10.22037/NBM.V7I2.22831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Various strategies have been proposed to minimize reperfusion delay in patients who are candidate for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Reperfusion time may be affected by both intra- and extra-hospital factors. The study attempted to identify factors affecting reperfusion time to reduce mortality and morbidity. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 95 patients with chest pain who were admitted to a hospital emergency in Tehran (capital city of Iran) were admitted and those who were diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were candidates for primary PCI. Basic information was asked from the patients or companion of them. In addition, the PCI time recorded in the patient file was entered in the checklist. Results: The mean interval between the onset of symptoms and primary PCI was 218.6±21.69 min. The interval between the first medical contact (FMC) and primary PCI was determined to be 87.122±183.66 minutes. The mean time of door to balloon in the hospital was 42.49±78.53 min. In addition, the mean time interval from symptom onset to FMC was 19.47±11.84 minutes. In 31 cases (32.6%), the emergency service (EMS) contacted. Three factors were identified to be associated with a delay between the onset of symptoms to primary PCI (or delay reperfusion time) including the previous history of myocardial infarction (MI) (p=0.034), the severity of coronary artery disease, based on angiography (p=0.043) and the type of vehicle used to transfer the patient to the hospital (p=0.007). Conclusion: The reperfusion delay seems to be higher in our treatment center than in other centers. Three preceding factors of MI, the severity of coronary artery disease and the transmission of patients via EMS are considered factors associated with the reduction of reperfusion delay.","PeriodicalId":19372,"journal":{"name":"Novelty in Biomedicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"7-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novelty in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/NBM.V7I2.22831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Various strategies have been proposed to minimize reperfusion delay in patients who are candidate for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Reperfusion time may be affected by both intra- and extra-hospital factors. The study attempted to identify factors affecting reperfusion time to reduce mortality and morbidity. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 95 patients with chest pain who were admitted to a hospital emergency in Tehran (capital city of Iran) were admitted and those who were diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were candidates for primary PCI. Basic information was asked from the patients or companion of them. In addition, the PCI time recorded in the patient file was entered in the checklist. Results: The mean interval between the onset of symptoms and primary PCI was 218.6±21.69 min. The interval between the first medical contact (FMC) and primary PCI was determined to be 87.122±183.66 minutes. The mean time of door to balloon in the hospital was 42.49±78.53 min. In addition, the mean time interval from symptom onset to FMC was 19.47±11.84 minutes. In 31 cases (32.6%), the emergency service (EMS) contacted. Three factors were identified to be associated with a delay between the onset of symptoms to primary PCI (or delay reperfusion time) including the previous history of myocardial infarction (MI) (p=0.034), the severity of coronary artery disease, based on angiography (p=0.043) and the type of vehicle used to transfer the patient to the hospital (p=0.007). Conclusion: The reperfusion delay seems to be higher in our treatment center than in other centers. Three preceding factors of MI, the severity of coronary artery disease and the transmission of patients via EMS are considered factors associated with the reduction of reperfusion delay.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初次PCI下st段抬高型心肌梗死患者的再灌注延迟及其主要相关因素
背景:为了减少经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的再灌注延迟,人们提出了多种策略。再灌注时间可能受到院内和院外因素的影响。本研究试图确定影响再灌注时间的因素,以降低死亡率和发病率。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,95例在德黑兰(伊朗首都)医院急诊入院的胸痛患者,诊断为st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的患者是初级PCI的候选者。向患者或其同伴询问基本信息。此外,将患者档案中记录的PCI时间录入核对表。结果:患者出现症状至首次PCI的平均时间间隔为218.6±21.69 min,首次医疗接触(FMC)至首次PCI的时间间隔为87.122±183.66 min。住院患者进门到球囊的平均时间为42.49±78.53 min,从症状出现到FMC的平均时间间隔为19.47±11.84 min。其中31例(32.6%)联系了紧急服务(EMS)。确定了三个因素与症状发作到首次PCI(或延迟再灌注时间)之间的延迟相关,包括既往心肌梗死(MI)史(p=0.034)、基于血管造影的冠状动脉疾病严重程度(p=0.043)和用于将患者转移到医院的车辆类型(p=0.007)。结论:本中心再灌注延迟明显高于其他中心。心肌梗死的前三个因素、冠状动脉疾病的严重程度和患者通过EMS的传播被认为是减少再灌注延迟的相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unusual Airway Obstruction during General Anesthesia following Endotracheal Tube Cuff Herniation; A Case Report The Issue of Embryo Implantation in Women during the Coronavirus Outbreak: An Overview: Positive Result for SARS-CoV-2 RNA Test after a Long Time for the Patient with COVID-19 even after Discharge from the Hospital Investigating the Facilitating Factors of Drug Use Based on Personality and Ethnic Characteristics of Guilan Province Efficient of Toll‐Like Receptor 4 Knockout in Mouse Zygotes by CRISPER/Cas9:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1