Access to safer injection equipment among people who inject drugs utilizing medical services in an urban hospital in the United States

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Addiction Research & Theory Pub Date : 2023-01-04 DOI:10.1080/16066359.2022.2162889
D. Applewhite, S. Regan, K. Donelan, Wendy L. Macias-Konstantopoulos, Dawn Williamson, Laura G. Kehoe, C. Shaw, S. Wakeman
{"title":"Access to safer injection equipment among people who inject drugs utilizing medical services in an urban hospital in the United States","authors":"D. Applewhite, S. Regan, K. Donelan, Wendy L. Macias-Konstantopoulos, Dawn Williamson, Laura G. Kehoe, C. Shaw, S. Wakeman","doi":"10.1080/16066359.2022.2162889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Injection drug use carries significant risks for injury and infection, particularly when injection supplies are reused or shared. Syringe service programs and pharmacy nonprescription sale of syringes minimize this risk by promoting access to supplies. This study aimed to characterize how individuals accessing medical care obtain supplies and the impact of perceived barriers to accessing safer injection supplies. One hundred and twenty participants reporting past seven-day injection drug use were recruited from a large urban academic medical center. Participants completed a survey about their injection drug use practices, access to injection supplies, as well as barriers to accessing supplies. Most participants (68%) reported obtaining syringes from multiple sources over the past 3 months, most commonly syringe service programs (78%) or a pharmacy (68%). Few (3%) reported obtaining supplies from medical settings. Participants who found syringes easy to obtain were less likely to report reusing a syringe >10 times (25% vs. 81%, p < .001). More participants were comfortable obtaining syringes through syringe service programs (89%) than nonprescription sale of syringes (60%, p = .001). Perceiving syringe service programs as not convenient or not comfortable reduced the odds of obtaining syringes there by 90% (p < .001) and 88% (p < .003), respectively. Perceiving pharmacies as not comfortable or not affordable reduced the odds of obtaining syringes there by 82% (p < .001) and 75% (p < .002), respectively. Even in regions with legalized syringe service programs and nonprescription sale of syringes, barriers to accessing safer injection supplies remain, and may be partially addressed by expanding syringe service program hours and locations, addressing cost of nonprescription sale of syringes, pharmacy staff training, and expansion of injection supply distribution in medical settings.","PeriodicalId":47851,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Research & Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Research & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2022.2162889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Injection drug use carries significant risks for injury and infection, particularly when injection supplies are reused or shared. Syringe service programs and pharmacy nonprescription sale of syringes minimize this risk by promoting access to supplies. This study aimed to characterize how individuals accessing medical care obtain supplies and the impact of perceived barriers to accessing safer injection supplies. One hundred and twenty participants reporting past seven-day injection drug use were recruited from a large urban academic medical center. Participants completed a survey about their injection drug use practices, access to injection supplies, as well as barriers to accessing supplies. Most participants (68%) reported obtaining syringes from multiple sources over the past 3 months, most commonly syringe service programs (78%) or a pharmacy (68%). Few (3%) reported obtaining supplies from medical settings. Participants who found syringes easy to obtain were less likely to report reusing a syringe >10 times (25% vs. 81%, p < .001). More participants were comfortable obtaining syringes through syringe service programs (89%) than nonprescription sale of syringes (60%, p = .001). Perceiving syringe service programs as not convenient or not comfortable reduced the odds of obtaining syringes there by 90% (p < .001) and 88% (p < .003), respectively. Perceiving pharmacies as not comfortable or not affordable reduced the odds of obtaining syringes there by 82% (p < .001) and 75% (p < .002), respectively. Even in regions with legalized syringe service programs and nonprescription sale of syringes, barriers to accessing safer injection supplies remain, and may be partially addressed by expanding syringe service program hours and locations, addressing cost of nonprescription sale of syringes, pharmacy staff training, and expansion of injection supply distribution in medical settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国城市医院使用医疗服务的注射吸毒者获得更安全的注射设备的情况
摘要注射吸毒具有重大的伤害和感染风险,特别是当注射用品被重复使用或共用时。注射器服务规划和药房非处方注射器销售通过促进获得供应品来最大限度地减少这种风险。本研究旨在描述获得医疗服务的个人如何获得供应,以及感知障碍对获得更安全注射供应的影响。从一个大型城市学术医疗中心招募了120名报告过去7天注射药物使用情况的参与者。参与者完成了一项关于其注射药物使用做法、获得注射用品以及获得用品的障碍的调查。大多数参与者(68%)报告在过去3个月内从多个来源获得注射器,最常见的是注射器服务项目(78%)或药房(68%)。很少有人(3%)报告从医疗机构获得供应。发现注射器容易获得的参与者不太可能报告重复使用注射器10次(25%对81%,p < .001)。通过注射器服务项目获得注射器的参与者(89%)多于非处方销售注射器的参与者(60%,p = .001)。认为注射器服务项目不方便或不舒适的患者获得注射器的几率分别降低了90% (p < 0.001)和88% (p < 0.003)。认为药店不舒适或负担不起的人在那里获得注射器的几率分别降低了82% (p < 0.001)和75% (p < 0.001)。即使在有合法注射器服务计划和非处方注射器销售的地区,获得更安全注射用品的障碍仍然存在,这可以通过扩大注射器服务计划的时间和地点、解决非处方注射器销售的成本、药房工作人员培训和扩大医疗机构的注射供应分配来部分解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Since being founded in 1993, Addiction Research and Theory has been the leading outlet for research and theoretical contributions that view addictive behaviour as arising from psychological processes within the individual and the social context in which the behaviour takes place as much as from the biological effects of the psychoactive substance or activity involved. This cross-disciplinary journal examines addictive behaviours from a variety of perspectives and methods of inquiry. Disciplines represented in the journal include Anthropology, Economics, Epidemiology, Medicine, Sociology, Psychology and History, but high quality contributions from other relevant areas will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Can ‘justified disapproval’ be separated from addiction stigma? An empirical focus is required Do older adults drink alcohol whilst taking alcohol-interactive medication? Prevalence and ten-year mortality risk: findings from the UK Whitehall II cohort study Ambulatory assessment to advance the science of nondrug reward in addiction and recovery Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care utilization for commercial and Medicaid beneficiaries with opioid use disorder Does the lived experience of gambling accord with quantitative self-report scores of gambling-related harm?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1