K. O. Hounkpatin, J. Stendahl, Mattias Lundblad, E. Karltun
{"title":"Predicting the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stock in Swedish forests using a group of covariates and site-specific data","authors":"K. O. Hounkpatin, J. Stendahl, Mattias Lundblad, E. Karltun","doi":"10.5194/SOIL-7-377-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The status of the soil organic carbon (SOC) stock at any position in the landscape is subject to a complex interplay of soil state factors operating at different scales and\nregulating multiple processes resulting either in soils acting as a net sink or net source of carbon. Forest landscapes are characterized by high spatial variability, and key drivers of SOC stock might be specific for sub-areas compared to those influencing the whole landscape. Consequently, separately calibrating models for sub-areas (local models) that collectively cover a target area can result in different prediction accuracy and SOC stock drivers compared to a single model (global model) that covers the whole area. The goal of this study was therefore to (1) assess how global and local models differ in predicting the humus layer, mineral soil, and total SOC stock in Swedish forests and (2) identify the key factors for SOC stock prediction and their scale of influence. We used the Swedish National Forest Soil Inventory (NFSI) database and a\ndigital soil mapping approach to evaluate the prediction performance using\nrandom forest models calibrated locally for the northern, central, and\nsouthern Sweden (local models) and for the whole of Sweden (global model).\nModels were built by considering (1) only site characteristics which are\nrecorded on the plot during the NFSI, (2) the group of covariates (remote sensing, historical land use data, etc.) and (3) both site characteristics and group of covariates consisting mostly of remote sensing data. Local models were generally more effective for predicting SOC stock after\ntesting on independent validation data. Using the group of covariates\ntogether with NFSI data indicated that such covariates have limited\npredictive strength but that site-specific covariates from the NFSI showed\nbetter explanatory strength for SOC stocks. The most important covariates\nthat influence the humus layer, mineral soil (0–50 cm), and total SOC\nstock were related to the site-characteristic covariates and include the\nsoil moisture class, vegetation type, soil type, and soil texture. This study showed that local calibration has the potential to improve prediction\naccuracy, which will vary depending on the type of available covariates.\n","PeriodicalId":22015,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/SOIL-7-377-2021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Abstract. The status of the soil organic carbon (SOC) stock at any position in the landscape is subject to a complex interplay of soil state factors operating at different scales and
regulating multiple processes resulting either in soils acting as a net sink or net source of carbon. Forest landscapes are characterized by high spatial variability, and key drivers of SOC stock might be specific for sub-areas compared to those influencing the whole landscape. Consequently, separately calibrating models for sub-areas (local models) that collectively cover a target area can result in different prediction accuracy and SOC stock drivers compared to a single model (global model) that covers the whole area. The goal of this study was therefore to (1) assess how global and local models differ in predicting the humus layer, mineral soil, and total SOC stock in Swedish forests and (2) identify the key factors for SOC stock prediction and their scale of influence. We used the Swedish National Forest Soil Inventory (NFSI) database and a
digital soil mapping approach to evaluate the prediction performance using
random forest models calibrated locally for the northern, central, and
southern Sweden (local models) and for the whole of Sweden (global model).
Models were built by considering (1) only site characteristics which are
recorded on the plot during the NFSI, (2) the group of covariates (remote sensing, historical land use data, etc.) and (3) both site characteristics and group of covariates consisting mostly of remote sensing data. Local models were generally more effective for predicting SOC stock after
testing on independent validation data. Using the group of covariates
together with NFSI data indicated that such covariates have limited
predictive strength but that site-specific covariates from the NFSI showed
better explanatory strength for SOC stocks. The most important covariates
that influence the humus layer, mineral soil (0–50 cm), and total SOC
stock were related to the site-characteristic covariates and include the
soil moisture class, vegetation type, soil type, and soil texture. This study showed that local calibration has the potential to improve prediction
accuracy, which will vary depending on the type of available covariates.
期刊介绍:
Cessation.Soil Science satisfies the professional needs of all scientists and laboratory personnel involved in soil and plant research by publishing primary research reports and critical reviews of basic and applied soil science, especially as it relates to soil and plant studies and general environmental soil science.
Each month, Soil Science presents authoritative research articles from an impressive array of discipline: soil chemistry and biochemistry, physics, fertility and nutrition, soil genesis and morphology, soil microbiology and mineralogy. Of immediate relevance to soil scientists-both industrial and academic-this unique publication also has long-range value for agronomists and environmental scientists.