Dream sharing and the enhancement of empathy: Theoretical and applied implications.

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Dreaming Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1037/drm0000165
M. Blagrove, J. Lockheart, M. Carr, Shanice Basra, Harriet Graham, H. Lewis, Emily Murphy, Ausrine Sakalauskaite, Caitlin Trotman, Katja Valli
{"title":"Dream sharing and the enhancement of empathy: Theoretical and applied implications.","authors":"M. Blagrove, J. Lockheart, M. Carr, Shanice Basra, Harriet Graham, H. Lewis, Emily Murphy, Ausrine Sakalauskaite, Caitlin Trotman, Katja Valli","doi":"10.1037/drm0000165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study replicated and extended a previous finding that the discussion of dreams increases the level of empathy toward the dreamer from those with whom the dream is discussed. The study addressed mediating variables for the empathy effect. Participants were recruited in dyads who already knew each other and were assigned dream-sharer and discusser roles. Each dyad used the Ullman dream appreciation technique to explore the relationship of the sharer’s dreams to recent experiences in the sharer’s life, with a maximum of four dream discussions per dyad (mean length of dreams = 140.15 words, mean discussion length = 23.72 minutes). The empathy of each member of a dyad toward the other was assessed using a 12-item state empathy questionnaire. Forty-four participants (females = 26, males = 18, mean age = 26.70) provided empathy scores at baseline and after each dream discussion. For below median baseline empathy scorers, empathy of discussers toward their dream-sharer increased significantly as a result of the dream discussions, with medium effect size, 𝜂 2 = 0.39. Dream-sharers had a non-significant increase in empathy toward their discusser. Change in empathy was not linear across successive discussions, and was not related to length of dream reports, nor length of discussions. These findings of post-sleep, social effects of dreaming, with possibly a group bonding function, go beyond theories of dreaming that have a within-sleep emotional or memory processing function for the individual.","PeriodicalId":46498,"journal":{"name":"Dreaming","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dreaming","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/drm0000165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study replicated and extended a previous finding that the discussion of dreams increases the level of empathy toward the dreamer from those with whom the dream is discussed. The study addressed mediating variables for the empathy effect. Participants were recruited in dyads who already knew each other and were assigned dream-sharer and discusser roles. Each dyad used the Ullman dream appreciation technique to explore the relationship of the sharer’s dreams to recent experiences in the sharer’s life, with a maximum of four dream discussions per dyad (mean length of dreams = 140.15 words, mean discussion length = 23.72 minutes). The empathy of each member of a dyad toward the other was assessed using a 12-item state empathy questionnaire. Forty-four participants (females = 26, males = 18, mean age = 26.70) provided empathy scores at baseline and after each dream discussion. For below median baseline empathy scorers, empathy of discussers toward their dream-sharer increased significantly as a result of the dream discussions, with medium effect size, 𝜂 2 = 0.39. Dream-sharers had a non-significant increase in empathy toward their discusser. Change in empathy was not linear across successive discussions, and was not related to length of dream reports, nor length of discussions. These findings of post-sleep, social effects of dreaming, with possibly a group bonding function, go beyond theories of dreaming that have a within-sleep emotional or memory processing function for the individual.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
梦境分享与共情的增强:理论与应用意义。
这项研究重复并扩展了先前的一个发现,即讨论梦境会增加与之讨论梦境的人对做梦者的同理心。本研究探讨了共情效应的中介变量。参与者被分成两组招募,他们彼此已经认识,并被分配了分享梦想和讨论的角色。每个对子组使用Ullman梦境欣赏技术来探索分享者的梦境与最近生活经历的关系,每个对子组最多有四个梦境讨论(梦境平均长度= 140.15个单词,平均讨论长度= 23.72分钟)。使用一份包含12个项目的状态共情问卷来评估二人组中每个成员对另一个成员的共情。44名参与者(女性26岁,男性18岁,平均年龄26.70岁)在基线和每次梦境讨论后提供了共情得分。对于低于中位基线的共情得分者,讨论者对梦分享者的共情因梦境讨论而显著增加,具有中等效应量,𝜂2 = 0.39。梦境分享者对讨论者的同理心没有显著增加。在连续的讨论中,共情的变化不是线性的,也与梦报告的长度和讨论的长度无关。这些关于睡眠后做梦的社会效应的发现,可能具有群体联系功能,超越了梦的理论,这些理论在睡眠中对个人具有情感或记忆处理功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dreaming
Dreaming PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
27.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Dreaming is a multidisciplinary journal, the only professional journal devoted specifically to dreaming. The journal publishes scholarly articles related to dreaming from any discipline and viewpoint. This includes - biological aspects of dreaming and sleep/dream laboratory research - psychological articles of any kind related to dreaming - clinical work on dreams regardless of theoretical perspective (Freudian, Jungian, existential, eclectic, etc.) - anthropological, sociological, and philosophical articles related to dreaming - articles about dreaming from any of the arts and humanities
期刊最新文献
Relationship between trait anxiety and emotions in dreams, evaluated in older adults. Veteran treatment completers’ and facilitators’ perceptions of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia and imagery rehearsal therapy for posttraumatic sleep disturbances. Sports and dreaming: An online survey of American adults. The priming effect of presleep conscious thoughts on dreams. Dangerous waters: The impact of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami on survivor dream content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1