A comparative assessment of the amount and rate of orthodontic space closure toward a healed vs recent lower premolar extraction site.

E. A. Abu Alhaija, Rami A. Al Shayeb, S. Al-Khateeb, Hasan O. Daher, Saba O. Daher
{"title":"A comparative assessment of the amount and rate of orthodontic space closure toward a healed vs recent lower premolar extraction site.","authors":"E. A. Abu Alhaija, Rami A. Al Shayeb, S. Al-Khateeb, Hasan O. Daher, Saba O. Daher","doi":"10.2319/102921-797.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo investigate and compare the amount and rate of space closure and tooth tipping during orthodontic space closure toward a recent vs healed first premolar extraction site.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThe mandibular arches of 23 patients were included. Treatment plans included lower first premolar extractions. After reaching 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel archwires (SSAW), patients were subdivided into two groups (Group 1: space closure was carried out toward a healed first premolar extraction space and Group 2: space closure was carried out immediately after first premolar extraction). Elastomeric power chain from second molar to second molar was used to close lower extraction spaces. The following time points were defined: T1: just before space closure; T2-T4: 1-3 months after initial space closure. Records consisted of dental study models. The amount and rate of extraction space closure were evaluated at each time point.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn Group 1 (healed socket), a total amount of 1.98 mm (coronally) and 1.75 mm (gingivally) of space closure was achieved. The rate of space closure was 0.66 mm/month coronally and 0.58 mm/month gingivally. In Group 2 (recent socket), the total amount of space closure was 3.02 mm coronally and 2.68 mm gingivally. The rate of space closure was 1.01 mm/month coronally and 0.89 mm/month gingivally. Differences between the two groups were significant (P < .01). Tipping of adjacent teeth during space closure was similar in both groups (P > .05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn the lower arch, the amount and rate of space closure toward a recent extraction site were higher than that toward a healed extraction socket with similar tipping of teeth in both groups.","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/102921-797.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To investigate and compare the amount and rate of space closure and tooth tipping during orthodontic space closure toward a recent vs healed first premolar extraction site. MATERIALS AND METHODS The mandibular arches of 23 patients were included. Treatment plans included lower first premolar extractions. After reaching 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel archwires (SSAW), patients were subdivided into two groups (Group 1: space closure was carried out toward a healed first premolar extraction space and Group 2: space closure was carried out immediately after first premolar extraction). Elastomeric power chain from second molar to second molar was used to close lower extraction spaces. The following time points were defined: T1: just before space closure; T2-T4: 1-3 months after initial space closure. Records consisted of dental study models. The amount and rate of extraction space closure were evaluated at each time point. RESULTS In Group 1 (healed socket), a total amount of 1.98 mm (coronally) and 1.75 mm (gingivally) of space closure was achieved. The rate of space closure was 0.66 mm/month coronally and 0.58 mm/month gingivally. In Group 2 (recent socket), the total amount of space closure was 3.02 mm coronally and 2.68 mm gingivally. The rate of space closure was 1.01 mm/month coronally and 0.89 mm/month gingivally. Differences between the two groups were significant (P < .01). Tipping of adjacent teeth during space closure was similar in both groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS In the lower arch, the amount and rate of space closure toward a recent extraction site were higher than that toward a healed extraction socket with similar tipping of teeth in both groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正畸间隙关闭的数量和速度的比较评估对愈合和最近的下前磨牙拔牙位置。
目的探讨和比较第一前磨牙拔除部位近期与愈合后正畸过程中间隙封闭和牙齿倾斜的数量和发生率。材料与方法选取23例患者的下颌弓。治疗方案包括下颌第一前磨牙拔牙。在达到0.019 × 0.025英寸不锈钢弓丝(SSAW)后,将患者分为两组(第一组:在第一前磨牙拔牙愈合后进行间隙封闭,第二组:在第一前磨牙拔牙后立即进行间隙封闭)。从第二磨牙到第二磨牙的弹性动力链用于封闭较低的拔牙空间。定义以下时间点:T1:空间闭合前;T2-T4:初始空间闭合后1-3个月。记录包括牙科研究模型。在每个时间点评估抽吸空间闭合的数量和速率。RESULTSIn组1(愈合插座),总金额为1.98毫米(所以)和1.75毫米(牙龈)空间的闭包。冠侧空间闭合率为0.66 mm/月,龈侧空间闭合率为0.58 mm/月。第2组(近牙槽)冠侧和龈侧空隙封闭总量分别为3.02 mm和2.68 mm。冠侧空间闭合率为1.01 mm/月,龈侧空间闭合率为0.89 mm/月。两组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。两组牙槽闭合时邻近牙的倾斜程度相似(P < 0.05)。结论两组下牙弓近端拔牙位置的间隙闭合量和速率均高于近端拔牙槽的闭合量和速率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eruptive path of maxillary canines in patients with lateral incisor agenesis: a longitudinal follow-up. Which orthodontic articles are accessed online the most? Exploring article usage metrics along with citations and altmetrics. Three-dimensional assessment of the nasopharyngeal airway in Down syndrome during the mixed dentition period: a case-control study. Efficacy of planned moderate to severe torque changes in mandibular central incisors with an initial series of Invisalign aligners: a retrospective cohort study. An in vitro study of a combined patient-specific device for safe and accurate insertion of infrazygomatic crest miniscrews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1