Credit Guarantee Schemes – Are They Efficient? Experience from European Union Countries

Halina Waniak‑Michalak, M. Wozniak, R. Lisowski
{"title":"Credit Guarantee Schemes – Are They Efficient? Experience from European Union Countries","authors":"Halina Waniak‑Michalak, M. Wozniak, R. Lisowski","doi":"10.18778/1508-2008.25.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims to assess selected elements of the business models of credit guarantee schemes (CGSs) implemented in 20 European Union countries within the financial framework between 2007 and 2013. This paper focuses on the CGSs’ financial additionality that depends mainly on how these programs are managed, the institutions implementing them, the objectives set and their distribution constraints. We analyse the implementation costs and the use of the funds allocated to implement the schemes. To reach the goal, we used several methods: the Kruskal‑Wallis by ranks, the median test, discriminant analysis, multidimensional scaling, and correlation. We also did the power analysis. We discovered that the efficiency of CGS implemented by non‑governmental organisations, mutual guarantee funds and regional agencies is related to the level of regional development. The relationship is not visible only when banks are engaged, which may be due to the impossibility of assigning a bank’s activities to a single region. However, we did not find differences in efficiency between types of organisations that implement CGSs. The answers to the research questions posed in the article can help policymakers and researchers conclude whether it is cost‑effective to continue supporting CGSs and whether the management of these schemes should change. The paper contributes to the economic policy theory in the area of state aid to SMEs and public finance.","PeriodicalId":44249,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Economic Research-Central and Eastern Europe","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Economic Research-Central and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.25.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper aims to assess selected elements of the business models of credit guarantee schemes (CGSs) implemented in 20 European Union countries within the financial framework between 2007 and 2013. This paper focuses on the CGSs’ financial additionality that depends mainly on how these programs are managed, the institutions implementing them, the objectives set and their distribution constraints. We analyse the implementation costs and the use of the funds allocated to implement the schemes. To reach the goal, we used several methods: the Kruskal‑Wallis by ranks, the median test, discriminant analysis, multidimensional scaling, and correlation. We also did the power analysis. We discovered that the efficiency of CGS implemented by non‑governmental organisations, mutual guarantee funds and regional agencies is related to the level of regional development. The relationship is not visible only when banks are engaged, which may be due to the impossibility of assigning a bank’s activities to a single region. However, we did not find differences in efficiency between types of organisations that implement CGSs. The answers to the research questions posed in the article can help policymakers and researchers conclude whether it is cost‑effective to continue supporting CGSs and whether the management of these schemes should change. The paper contributes to the economic policy theory in the area of state aid to SMEs and public finance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信贷保证计划是否有效?来自欧盟国家的经验
本文旨在评估2007年至2013年金融框架内20个欧盟国家实施的信用担保计划(cgc)商业模式的选定要素。本文关注的是cgs的财务附加性,这主要取决于这些项目的管理方式、实施机构、设定的目标及其分配约束。我们分析了实施成本和用于实施这些计划的拨款的使用情况。为了达到目标,我们使用了几种方法:Kruskal - Wallis秩法、中位数检验、判别分析、多维标度和相关性。我们也做了功率分析。我们发现,非政府组织、互保基金和区域机构实施CGS的效率与区域发展水平有关。这种关系仅在银行参与时才可见,这可能是由于不可能将银行的活动分配到单个地区。然而,我们没有发现实施cgs的组织类型之间的效率差异。文章中提出的研究问题的答案可以帮助决策者和研究人员得出结论,继续支持cgs是否具有成本效益,以及这些计划的管理是否应该改变。本文对国家扶持中小企业和公共财政领域的经济政策理论有一定的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Smart Cities for the Sustainable Development of Local Communities: the Cases of the Volyn Region and the City of Lublin Poverty in Selected European Countries. A Spatio-temporal Analysis from 2003–2020 The Impact of Economic Equilibrium, Globalization, Human Development, and Market Competitiveness on the Sustainable Development of Manufacturing Enterprises – the Case of France, Germany, Italy and Poland The Mundell‑Fleming Model and Macroeconomic Stabilization Policies A Reassessment of Oil Market Volatility and Stock Market Volatility: Evidence from Selected SAARC Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1