{"title":"Performance Measurement Analysis Of Pt Pijar Sukma Using Performance Prism, Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp), And Objective Matrix (Omax) Methods","authors":"Afifah Afifah, Akhmad Syakhroni, Nuzulia Khoiriyah","doi":"10.30659/jast.2.01.34-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstrack - PT. Pijar Sukma is a furniture industry company, located in Jepara, Central Java. PT. Pijar Sukma is having problems that customer order requests cannot be fulfilled according to production targets. So companies need tools that can measure performance. This research uses the performance prism method which involves stakeholders so that they can form the sides of the prism, namely satisfaction, contribution, strategy, process, and capability. From these methods used to compile key performance indicators (KPIs), 30 KPIs were produced based on satisfaction and contributions in the design that had been prepared, there were 10 strategic KPIs, 10 process KPIs, and 10 capability KPIs that were weighted through the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method, then scored using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. OMAX to provide an actual value with a score of 1-10 on each KPI and the traffic light system as a color assignment, namely green means very good / the target is maximally appropriate, yellow is quite good / the target has not reached the maximum, and red means bad / the target has not been maximized . The results of the processing and calculation show that the company's performance index value of 2.836 is categorized as red with an actual value of 3.00, meaning the company has achieved the performance measurement plan but has not reached the set target so that the company can maintain good performance and make changes to poor performance by improving performance in red. Key words: Key Performance Indicators (KPI), Performance Prism, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Objective Matrix (OMAX), and Traffic Light System.","PeriodicalId":9207,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Applied Science and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Applied Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/jast.2.01.34-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstrack - PT. Pijar Sukma is a furniture industry company, located in Jepara, Central Java. PT. Pijar Sukma is having problems that customer order requests cannot be fulfilled according to production targets. So companies need tools that can measure performance. This research uses the performance prism method which involves stakeholders so that they can form the sides of the prism, namely satisfaction, contribution, strategy, process, and capability. From these methods used to compile key performance indicators (KPIs), 30 KPIs were produced based on satisfaction and contributions in the design that had been prepared, there were 10 strategic KPIs, 10 process KPIs, and 10 capability KPIs that were weighted through the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method, then scored using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. OMAX to provide an actual value with a score of 1-10 on each KPI and the traffic light system as a color assignment, namely green means very good / the target is maximally appropriate, yellow is quite good / the target has not reached the maximum, and red means bad / the target has not been maximized . The results of the processing and calculation show that the company's performance index value of 2.836 is categorized as red with an actual value of 3.00, meaning the company has achieved the performance measurement plan but has not reached the set target so that the company can maintain good performance and make changes to poor performance by improving performance in red. Key words: Key Performance Indicators (KPI), Performance Prism, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Objective Matrix (OMAX), and Traffic Light System.
PT. Pijar Sukma是一家家具工业公司,位于中爪哇的Jepara。PT. Pijar Sukma遇到客户订单要求无法按照生产目标完成的问题。因此,公司需要能够衡量业绩的工具。本研究采用绩效棱镜法,让利益相关者参与进来,形成棱镜的四个侧面,即满意度、贡献、战略、过程和能力。从这些用于编制关键绩效指标(kpi)的方法中,根据已准备好的设计满意度和贡献产生了30个kpi,其中10个战略kpi、10个过程kpi和10个能力kpi通过层次分析法(AHP)进行加权,然后使用层次分析法(AHP)进行评分。OMAX为每个KPI提供1-10分的实际值,并将交通灯系统作为颜色分配,即绿色表示非常好/目标最合适,黄色表示相当好/目标尚未达到最大值,红色表示差/目标尚未达到最大值。处理计算结果表明,公司绩效指标值为2.836,属于红色,实际值为3.00,说明公司已经完成了绩效衡量计划,但尚未达到设定的目标,公司可以通过提高绩效来保持良好的绩效,并改变较差的绩效。关键词:关键绩效指标(KPI)、绩效棱镜、层次分析法(AHP)、目标矩阵(OMAX)、红绿灯系统