Spaces of Struggle: Socialism and Neoliberalism With a Human Face Among Digital Parties and Online Movements in Europe

Emiliana De Blasio, M. Sorice
{"title":"Spaces of Struggle: Socialism and Neoliberalism With a Human Face Among Digital Parties and Online Movements in Europe","authors":"Emiliana De Blasio, M. Sorice","doi":"10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to illustrate the complexity of the relationships between digital participation spaces and organisations related to the Southern-European and US socialist traditions. Digital communication and, in particular, the various platforms of digital participation have been long living between the illusion of techno-libertarian thrusts and the technocratic tendencies framing the New Public Management approach. The suspicion of socialist-inspired parties but also of post-Marxist social movements towards the digital is connected on the one hand to the organisational structure of the parties and on the other hand to the capacity of neoliberalism to incorporate digital innovation in its cultural horizon. Participation platforms have often been functional to the emergence of a neoliberalism with a human face, capable of offering potential spaces of participation that depoliticise civic activism and transform it into a mere technical tool of minimal governance. In recent years, however, digital party experiences have developed in the context of left-wing organisations. In other cases, digital platforms have been used as tools of mobilisation and even as instruments for the creation of a new sentimental connections with the increasingly fragmented “popular classes”. Digital has thus become a “space of struggle”, in the same meaning it was used in the 1980s by Stuart Hall. This article presents the first findings of a research project on the use of digital platforms by: a) parties of socialist inspiration in Italy, France, Spain, Portugal and the USA; and b) bottom-up social movements. The analysis follows an empirical approach based on: a) the analysis of organisations; b) content analysis (Evaluation Assertion Analysis) of political and policy documents on the use of digital as a tool for political struggle; c) in-depth interviews to digital activists of social movements.","PeriodicalId":45788,"journal":{"name":"TRIPLEC-Communication Capitalism & Critique","volume":"12 1","pages":"84-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRIPLEC-Communication Capitalism & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article aims to illustrate the complexity of the relationships between digital participation spaces and organisations related to the Southern-European and US socialist traditions. Digital communication and, in particular, the various platforms of digital participation have been long living between the illusion of techno-libertarian thrusts and the technocratic tendencies framing the New Public Management approach. The suspicion of socialist-inspired parties but also of post-Marxist social movements towards the digital is connected on the one hand to the organisational structure of the parties and on the other hand to the capacity of neoliberalism to incorporate digital innovation in its cultural horizon. Participation platforms have often been functional to the emergence of a neoliberalism with a human face, capable of offering potential spaces of participation that depoliticise civic activism and transform it into a mere technical tool of minimal governance. In recent years, however, digital party experiences have developed in the context of left-wing organisations. In other cases, digital platforms have been used as tools of mobilisation and even as instruments for the creation of a new sentimental connections with the increasingly fragmented “popular classes”. Digital has thus become a “space of struggle”, in the same meaning it was used in the 1980s by Stuart Hall. This article presents the first findings of a research project on the use of digital platforms by: a) parties of socialist inspiration in Italy, France, Spain, Portugal and the USA; and b) bottom-up social movements. The analysis follows an empirical approach based on: a) the analysis of organisations; b) content analysis (Evaluation Assertion Analysis) of political and policy documents on the use of digital as a tool for political struggle; c) in-depth interviews to digital activists of social movements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斗争的空间:欧洲数字政党和网络运动中带有人性的社会主义和新自由主义
本文旨在说明与南欧和美国社会主义传统相关的数字参与空间和组织之间关系的复杂性。长期以来,数字通信,特别是各种数字参与平台,一直存在于技术自由主义的幻想和构成新公共管理方法的技术官僚倾向之间。对受社会主义启发的政党的怀疑,以及对后马克思主义社会运动走向数字的怀疑,一方面与政党的组织结构有关,另一方面与新自由主义将数字创新纳入其文化视野的能力有关。参与平台通常对具有人性面孔的新自由主义的出现起着作用,能够提供潜在的参与空间,使公民行动主义非政治化,并将其转变为仅仅是最小治理的技术工具。然而,近年来,在左翼组织的背景下,数字政党的经验得到了发展。在其他情况下,数字平台被用作动员的工具,甚至被用作与日益分散的“大众阶层”建立新的情感联系的工具。因此,数字已经成为一个“斗争的空间”,这与20世纪80年代斯图尔特·霍尔(Stuart Hall)使用的意思相同。本文介绍了一项关于意大利、法国、西班牙、葡萄牙和美国的社会主义政党使用数字平台的研究项目的初步发现;b)自下而上的社会运动。该分析遵循一种基于以下方面的实证方法:a)对组织的分析;b)关于使用数字作为政治斗争工具的政治和政策文件的内容分析(评估断言分析);C)对社会运动的数字积极分子的深度采访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advertising – a Necessary “Elixir of Life” for Capitalism: On the Critique of the Political Economy of Advertising How Work as a Category of Thought Has Been Disrupted in Neoliberal Capitalist Societies Media, Journalism, and the Public Sphere in Private Family Ownership. On the Critique of the Political Economy of Capitalist Media Enterprises “There is a better you in you”: Promises and Ideologies of Self-Tracking Technologies Toward a Reevaluation of Siegfried Kracauer and the Frankfurt School
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1