Spiritual wellbeing and depression for pregnant mothers in Covid-19 crisis

H. Alimoradi, M. Nazari, R. Nodoushan, A. Ajdani
{"title":"Spiritual wellbeing and depression for pregnant mothers in Covid-19 crisis","authors":"H. Alimoradi, M. Nazari, R. Nodoushan, A. Ajdani","doi":"10.4103/ed.ed_28_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Women with high-risk pregnancies experience changes in their personal, family, and social lives that can affect their quality of life and depression. Pregnancy, along with other predisposing factors, can cause or exacerbate depression. Eventually, 15% of depressed people commit suicide. The purpose of this research was to see how COVID-19 affected the condition of pregnancy (high risk or normal), as well as well-being and depressive symptoms in pregnant women. Methods: This is an analytical case–control analysis that included 500 pregnant women (250 in the case group and 250 in the control group) who were pregnant during the COVID-19 timeframe for health care during pregnancy. The samples were chosen at random and then grouped into two categories based on the definitions of high-risk pregnancy and normal pregnancy: normal pregnancy (control group) and high-risk pregnancy (case group). A three-part questionnaire with demographic features, the Paloutzian and Ellison Religious Well-Being Questionnaire, and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-42 Depression Inventory were used to gather data. Results: According to the findings of this report, the mean score of religious well-being of pregnant mothers with high-risk pregnancies was lower than that of pregnant women with average pregnancies, as were the mean scores of depression. The distinction between a normal pregnancy and a high-risk pregnancy is important. Furthermore, the Pearson correlation coefficient test revealed a strong association between psychological well-being and depression in all types of mothers with high-risk and average pregnancies (r = −0.7) (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Pregnant women with high-risk pregnancies have less psychological well-being than pregnant women with regular pregnancies. Furthermore, these mothers have a greater risk of depression than pregnant women with normal pregnancies.","PeriodicalId":11702,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Disease","volume":"26 1","pages":"45 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ed.ed_28_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women with high-risk pregnancies experience changes in their personal, family, and social lives that can affect their quality of life and depression. Pregnancy, along with other predisposing factors, can cause or exacerbate depression. Eventually, 15% of depressed people commit suicide. The purpose of this research was to see how COVID-19 affected the condition of pregnancy (high risk or normal), as well as well-being and depressive symptoms in pregnant women. Methods: This is an analytical case–control analysis that included 500 pregnant women (250 in the case group and 250 in the control group) who were pregnant during the COVID-19 timeframe for health care during pregnancy. The samples were chosen at random and then grouped into two categories based on the definitions of high-risk pregnancy and normal pregnancy: normal pregnancy (control group) and high-risk pregnancy (case group). A three-part questionnaire with demographic features, the Paloutzian and Ellison Religious Well-Being Questionnaire, and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-42 Depression Inventory were used to gather data. Results: According to the findings of this report, the mean score of religious well-being of pregnant mothers with high-risk pregnancies was lower than that of pregnant women with average pregnancies, as were the mean scores of depression. The distinction between a normal pregnancy and a high-risk pregnancy is important. Furthermore, the Pearson correlation coefficient test revealed a strong association between psychological well-being and depression in all types of mothers with high-risk and average pregnancies (r = −0.7) (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Pregnant women with high-risk pregnancies have less psychological well-being than pregnant women with regular pregnancies. Furthermore, these mothers have a greater risk of depression than pregnant women with normal pregnancies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid-19危机中孕妇的精神健康和抑郁
背景:高危妊娠妇女经历了个人、家庭和社会生活的变化,这些变化会影响她们的生活质量和抑郁症。怀孕,连同其他易感因素,可以引起或加重抑郁症。最终,15%的抑郁症患者会自杀。这项研究的目的是了解COVID-19如何影响怀孕状况(高风险或正常),以及孕妇的幸福感和抑郁症状。方法:采用分析性病例-对照分析方法,纳入500名在COVID-19期间怀孕的孕妇(病例组250名,对照组250名)。随机抽取样本,根据高危妊娠和正常妊娠的定义分为正常妊娠组(对照组)和高危妊娠组(病例组)。采用人口统计学特征的三部分问卷、Paloutzian和Ellison宗教幸福问卷、抑郁、焦虑和压力量表-42抑郁量表收集数据。结果:根据本报告的研究结果,高危妊娠孕妇的宗教幸福感的平均得分低于普通妊娠孕妇,抑郁的平均得分也低于普通妊娠孕妇。区分正常妊娠和高危妊娠很重要。此外,Pearson相关系数检验显示,在所有高危妊娠和普通妊娠类型的母亲中,心理健康与抑郁之间存在很强的关联(r = - 0.7) (P = 0.001)。结论:高危妊娠孕妇的心理幸福感低于正常妊娠孕妇。此外,这些母亲比正常怀孕的孕妇患抑郁症的风险更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Activities-specific balance confidence scale in elderly in community nursing home Evaluation of formaldehyde emissions by school supplies using a low-cost passive sampler and spectrophotometric determination Human immunodeficiency virus self-testing in India: Time to move from evidence to implementation Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: A marker for potential short-term neurological deterioration in acute large vessel occlusion patients postmechanical thrombectomy Sustaining and augmenting the pace of ongoing prevention and control activities to attain the goal of leprosy-free world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1