Knowledge and Competencies of Vaccinators on Routine Childhood Vaccination in Ghana

D. Ansong, F. Osei, A. Enimil, K. Boateng, I. Nyanor, E. X. Amuzu, A. Owusu, Nicholas Mensah Karikari
{"title":"Knowledge and Competencies of Vaccinators on Routine Childhood Vaccination in Ghana","authors":"D. Ansong, F. Osei, A. Enimil, K. Boateng, I. Nyanor, E. X. Amuzu, A. Owusu, Nicholas Mensah Karikari","doi":"10.4172/2157-7560.1000389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI), since its inception in 1974, has helped avert about 2-3 million deaths annually. In Ghana, there is inadequate information on the transition from knowledge acquired in the classroom to practice among vaccinators. This study seeks to provide evidence on the level of knowledge and competencies of vaccinators in Ghana. Method: A prospective cross-sectional study with consecutive sampling technique was employed to select 110 eligible subjects from health facilities in two districts in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Data were collected in real time using standardised tools, uploaded on the Open Data Kit (ODK), and subsequently exported to STATA 13.0 for statistical analysis. Results: Seventy two percent (72.73%) of respondents were from urban health facilities. Community Health Nurses constituted majority of respondents 83.09%. Sixty-five percent (65.46%) of participants had less than five years’ experience in vaccination. BCG was correctly identified by 91.82% of respondents as a single dose vaccine and yellow fever by 89.09%. Pentavalent, rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccine were correctly identified by 91.82%, 82.73% and 82.73% respectively as multiple dose vaccines. Ninety seven percent (97.27%) of respondents correctly mentioned pentavalent as having its first dose administered at 6 weeks. 98.18% correctly indicated pentavalent and pneumococcal as given intramuscularly whereas 92.27% identified OPV and rotavirus as given orally. Eighty-eight percent (88.18%) of respondents knew vaccine temperature charting is required twice a day. Conclusion: The study revealed gaps in the principles of vaccine handling and administration. A critical need for routine assessment and refresher training for population where vaccination is conducted by different level of training.","PeriodicalId":17656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination","volume":"2014 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7560.1000389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI), since its inception in 1974, has helped avert about 2-3 million deaths annually. In Ghana, there is inadequate information on the transition from knowledge acquired in the classroom to practice among vaccinators. This study seeks to provide evidence on the level of knowledge and competencies of vaccinators in Ghana. Method: A prospective cross-sectional study with consecutive sampling technique was employed to select 110 eligible subjects from health facilities in two districts in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Data were collected in real time using standardised tools, uploaded on the Open Data Kit (ODK), and subsequently exported to STATA 13.0 for statistical analysis. Results: Seventy two percent (72.73%) of respondents were from urban health facilities. Community Health Nurses constituted majority of respondents 83.09%. Sixty-five percent (65.46%) of participants had less than five years’ experience in vaccination. BCG was correctly identified by 91.82% of respondents as a single dose vaccine and yellow fever by 89.09%. Pentavalent, rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccine were correctly identified by 91.82%, 82.73% and 82.73% respectively as multiple dose vaccines. Ninety seven percent (97.27%) of respondents correctly mentioned pentavalent as having its first dose administered at 6 weeks. 98.18% correctly indicated pentavalent and pneumococcal as given intramuscularly whereas 92.27% identified OPV and rotavirus as given orally. Eighty-eight percent (88.18%) of respondents knew vaccine temperature charting is required twice a day. Conclusion: The study revealed gaps in the principles of vaccine handling and administration. A critical need for routine assessment and refresher training for population where vaccination is conducted by different level of training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳常规儿童疫苗接种接种员的知识和能力
背景:扩大免疫规划自1974年成立以来,每年帮助避免了约200万至300万人死亡。在加纳,关于将课堂知识转化为接种人员实践的信息不足。本研究旨在为加纳接种员的知识水平和能力提供证据。方法:采用前瞻性横断面研究,采用连续抽样技术,从加纳阿散蒂地区两个地区的卫生机构中选择110名符合条件的受试者。使用标准化工具实时收集数据,上传到开放数据工具包(ODK),随后导出到STATA 13.0进行统计分析。结果:72%(72.73%)的被调查者来自城市卫生机构。社区卫生护士占多数(83.09%)。65%(65.46%)的参与者接种疫苗的经验少于5年。91.82%的应答者正确识别卡介苗为单剂疫苗,89.09%的应答者正确识别黄热病为单剂疫苗。五价疫苗、轮状病毒疫苗和肺炎球菌疫苗为多剂量疫苗的正确率分别为91.82%、82.73%和82.73%。97%(97.27%)的应答者正确地提到五价在6周时给予第一剂。98.18%的人正确指出五价和肺炎球菌是肌肉注射,而92.27%的人正确指出口服口服脊髓灰质炎病毒和轮状病毒。88%(88.18%)的应答者知道每天需要做两次疫苗温度表。结论:该研究揭示了疫苗处理和给药原则方面的差距。迫切需要对通过不同级别培训进行疫苗接种的人群进行常规评估和进修培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential Transcription Profiling in Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Between Myasthenia Gravis Patients With or Without Thymoma Rapid screening for variants of concern in routine SARS-CoV-2 PCR diagnostics Mast Cells and COVID-19: a case report implicating a role of mast cell activation in the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 Evaluating Child Malnutrition in Southern Belize Using an Anthropologic Screening Tool Sero-prevalence and risk factors for sheeppox in Kordofan states in Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1