Observation effects on learning in horses

K.L. Baer , G.D. Potter , T.H. Friend , B.V. Beaver
{"title":"Observation effects on learning in horses","authors":"K.L. Baer ,&nbsp;G.D. Potter ,&nbsp;T.H. Friend ,&nbsp;B.V. Beaver","doi":"10.1016/0304-3762(83)90121-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sixteen horses, divided into 2 groups of 8, were used to study observational learning in horses. One group served as controls while the other group served as the treated group (observers). Observers were allowed to watch a correctly performed discrimination task for 5 days prior to testing their learning response using the same task. Discrimination testing was conducted on all horses daily for 14 days, with criterion set at 7 out of 8 responses correct with the last 5 consecutively correct. The maximum number of trials performed without reaching criterion was limited to 20 per day. Mean trials to criteria (MT) by group were: control, 11.25; observer, 10.70. Mean error (ME) scores were: control, 2.37; observer, 2.02. Average initial discrimination error scores were 11.13 for control and 10.38 for observers (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.10). Asymptote was reached by Day 8 for both control and observer groups. Analysis of variance with repeated measures showed an extreme-day effect indicative of learning (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), with non-significant differences in learning rate between experimental groups. Whether the initial ability of the horses to perform a discrimination learning task was enhanced by observation of other horses' performance of that task was not obvious from these data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100106,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Ethology","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3762(83)90121-9","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304376283901219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

Sixteen horses, divided into 2 groups of 8, were used to study observational learning in horses. One group served as controls while the other group served as the treated group (observers). Observers were allowed to watch a correctly performed discrimination task for 5 days prior to testing their learning response using the same task. Discrimination testing was conducted on all horses daily for 14 days, with criterion set at 7 out of 8 responses correct with the last 5 consecutively correct. The maximum number of trials performed without reaching criterion was limited to 20 per day. Mean trials to criteria (MT) by group were: control, 11.25; observer, 10.70. Mean error (ME) scores were: control, 2.37; observer, 2.02. Average initial discrimination error scores were 11.13 for control and 10.38 for observers (P < 0.10). Asymptote was reached by Day 8 for both control and observer groups. Analysis of variance with repeated measures showed an extreme-day effect indicative of learning (P < 0.01), with non-significant differences in learning rate between experimental groups. Whether the initial ability of the horses to perform a discrimination learning task was enhanced by observation of other horses' performance of that task was not obvious from these data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
观察对马学习的影响
16匹马被分成两组,每组8匹,用于研究马的观察学习。一组作为对照组,另一组作为治疗组(观察组)。观察者被允许观看正确执行的区分任务5天,然后使用相同的任务测试他们的学习反应。每天对所有马进行辨别测试,持续14天,标准设定为8个回答中有7个正确,最后5个连续正确。未达到标准的最大试验数量限制为每天20次。各组标准的平均试验数(MT)为:对照组,11.25;观察者,10.70。平均误差(ME)评分为:对照组2.37分;观察者,2.02。对照组和观察组的平均初始辨别误差分别为11.13分和10.38分(P <0.10)。对照组和观察组均在第8天达到渐近线。重复测量的方差分析显示极端日效应表明学习(P <0.01),实验组间学习率差异无统计学意义。从这些数据来看,马执行辨别学习任务的初始能力是否会通过观察其他马在该任务中的表现而得到增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subject index Author index The role of behavior in sheep production: A review of research The role of behavior in swine production: A review of research Some observations on the role of behavior in poultry production and future research needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1