Ten years of implementation: Assertive Community Treatment and Integrated Dual Disorder Treatment in a statewide system

Jennifer M. Harrison, H. Taylor
{"title":"Ten years of implementation: Assertive Community Treatment and Integrated Dual Disorder Treatment in a statewide system","authors":"Jennifer M. Harrison, H. Taylor","doi":"10.31296/AOP.V3I2.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence and seriousness of co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders are significant public health issues facing our communities. Individuals with co-occurring disorders have worse outcomes in important areas, including physical health, employment, incarceration, and housing, and are often more difficult to engage in effective treatment. Equally important, however, are the multiple examples of impressive recovery journeys for individuals with even the most severe co-occurring illnesses, often in collaboration with treatment providers who support that recovery. Implementation and sustainability of evidence-based practices, which are associated with improved outcomes in areas of hospitalization, incarceration, employment, and treatment engagement, is an individual recovery and policy imperative. Yet, the implementation of these complex practices involving multiple practitioners from different disciplines can be challenging for systems of care. Training, systemic changes, and fidelity monitoring can be components to enhance implementation. In one state, the implementation, support, and fidelity measurement of two multi-disciplinary practices for the treatment of co-disorders, Integrated Dual Disorder Treatment (IDDT) and Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), is studied. Iterative steps to implementation over a ten-year period are examined. Lessons learned for research, policy, and training of teams to assist people in achieving recovery are reviewed.","PeriodicalId":92173,"journal":{"name":"Archives of psychology (Chicago, Ill.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of psychology (Chicago, Ill.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31296/AOP.V3I2.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The prevalence and seriousness of co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders are significant public health issues facing our communities. Individuals with co-occurring disorders have worse outcomes in important areas, including physical health, employment, incarceration, and housing, and are often more difficult to engage in effective treatment. Equally important, however, are the multiple examples of impressive recovery journeys for individuals with even the most severe co-occurring illnesses, often in collaboration with treatment providers who support that recovery. Implementation and sustainability of evidence-based practices, which are associated with improved outcomes in areas of hospitalization, incarceration, employment, and treatment engagement, is an individual recovery and policy imperative. Yet, the implementation of these complex practices involving multiple practitioners from different disciplines can be challenging for systems of care. Training, systemic changes, and fidelity monitoring can be components to enhance implementation. In one state, the implementation, support, and fidelity measurement of two multi-disciplinary practices for the treatment of co-disorders, Integrated Dual Disorder Treatment (IDDT) and Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), is studied. Iterative steps to implementation over a ten-year period are examined. Lessons learned for research, policy, and training of teams to assist people in achieving recovery are reviewed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
十年的实施:自信的社区治疗和综合双重障碍治疗在全州系统
同时发生的精神健康和物质使用障碍的普遍性和严重性是我们社区面临的重大公共卫生问题。患有共存疾病的个体在一些重要领域的结果更差,包括身体健康、就业、监禁和住房,而且往往更难以进行有效的治疗。然而,同样重要的是,有许多令人印象深刻的康复之旅的例子,这些例子往往是与支持康复的治疗提供者合作进行的,即使是最严重的合并疾病。基于证据的做法的实施和可持续性与住院、监禁、就业和治疗参与等领域的改善成果相关,是一项个人康复和政策上的当务之急。然而,这些涉及来自不同学科的多名从业人员的复杂实践的实施可能对护理系统具有挑战性。培训、系统变革和保真度监测可以作为加强实施的组成部分。在一个国家,实施,支持和保真度测量两种多学科实践的治疗共障碍,综合双重障碍治疗(IDDT)和自信的社区治疗(ACT),进行了研究。审查了在十年期间实施的迭代步骤。本文回顾了研究、政策和团队培训方面的经验教训,以帮助人们实现恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of the In vivo program on salivary cortisol and internalized symptoms of adolescents: a multiple case pilot study Affect Intolerance is Associated with Insecure Attachment and Reduced Self-Esteem in Adults A Primer on Reliability via Coefficient Alpha and Omega Manage Stress to Tackle Mental Health Problems in the Workplace A comparison between the Bayesian parametric and the semiparametric approach in estimating nonpolynomial instantaneous indirect effect in the Structural Equation Model with ordinal data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1