Marriage equality in India: thinking beyond judicial challenges to secular marriage law

Akshat Agarwal
{"title":"Marriage equality in India: thinking beyond judicial challenges to secular marriage law","authors":"Akshat Agarwal","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2021.1974768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Challenging India’s secular marriage law, the Special Marriage Act (SMA), is the most popular approach for realizing marriage equality in India. I argue that it is important to think beyond judicial challenges to the SMA since only locating marriage equality in the SMA may be inadequate in realizing the potential of marriage equality for all LGBT+ persons. This is because focusing on the SMA ignores the intersectional nature of LGBT+ identity in India and also fails to account for the interconnectedness of Indian family laws. Focusing only on secular law ignores both the continuing relevance of religion-based personal laws in shaping individual identity and the legal reality that secular laws do not operate autonomously due to the interconnectedness of Indian family laws. Instead, I outline alternative approaches that range from reforming different personal laws to judicial challenges questioning the legal non-recognition of LGBT+ relationships in family law as a whole.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2021.1974768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Challenging India’s secular marriage law, the Special Marriage Act (SMA), is the most popular approach for realizing marriage equality in India. I argue that it is important to think beyond judicial challenges to the SMA since only locating marriage equality in the SMA may be inadequate in realizing the potential of marriage equality for all LGBT+ persons. This is because focusing on the SMA ignores the intersectional nature of LGBT+ identity in India and also fails to account for the interconnectedness of Indian family laws. Focusing only on secular law ignores both the continuing relevance of religion-based personal laws in shaping individual identity and the legal reality that secular laws do not operate autonomously due to the interconnectedness of Indian family laws. Instead, I outline alternative approaches that range from reforming different personal laws to judicial challenges questioning the legal non-recognition of LGBT+ relationships in family law as a whole.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度的婚姻平等:超越对世俗婚姻法司法挑战的思考
《特别婚姻法》(SMA)是对印度世俗婚姻法的挑战,是印度实现婚姻平等最普遍的途径。我认为重要的是要超越对SMA的司法挑战,因为仅仅将婚姻平等定位在SMA中可能不足以实现所有LGBT+人群的婚姻平等潜力。这是因为关注SMA忽略了印度LGBT+身份的交叉性,也没有考虑到印度家庭法的相互关联性。只关注世俗法忽略了基于宗教的属人法在塑造个人身份方面的持续相关性,以及世俗法由于印度家庭法的相互联系而不能自主运作的法律现实。相反,我列出了一些可供选择的方法,从改革不同的属人法到质疑整个家庭法中不承认LGBT+关系的司法挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interpreting without bannisters? The abstraction problem afflicting the basic structure doctrine Courts, mining conflicts, and Adivasi rights: a case study from central India (2000–2022) “ Mutated Sumangali Scheme ”: challenges in enforcement of labour laws in spinning mills of Tamil Nadu Protection of stakeholders’ interests in the Indian corporate landscape: examining the “ifs and buts” The maze of interpretation: abortion laws and legal indeterminacy in Indian courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1