International Hospital Performance Assessment: Developing a Questionnaire

M. Mohammadnia, K. Hajinabi, M. Farahani, Ali Komeli
{"title":"International Hospital Performance Assessment: Developing a Questionnaire","authors":"M. Mohammadnia, K. Hajinabi, M. Farahani, Ali Komeli","doi":"10.22037/NBM.V6I3.20813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: As there is no valid questionnaire for assessing international hospital performance from providers’ perspective, this study aimed to develop a reliable as well as valid questionnaire for Iranian hospitals. M aterials and Methods: To develop the International Hospital Performance Assessment (IHPA) questionnaire, literature review did and comparative study conducted for extracting relevant items from twenty leader hospitals in all over the world. After that, to design the questionnaire and estimate its content validity index and ratio (CVI, CVR), 20 medical tourism experts selected. Then, questionnaire‘s construct validity (CVI & CVR) determined by using SPSS version 21 as well as exploratory factor analysis. Finally, reliability assessed by calculating Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. R es ults: The content validity of the questionnaire determined as (CVI= 0.85, CVR= 0.60). According to expert opinion 5 dimensions of the questionnaire selected from World Health Organization hospital performance framework, which were clinical effectiveness and patient safety, efficiency, patient centeredness, governance responsiveness and even staff orientation. Furthermore, results of exploratory factor analysis showed that the questionnaire contained 45 items and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.687. C onclusion: Results indicated that standard IHPA questionnaire with 45 items in 5 dimensions developed as a tool for measuring hospitals’ quality of care in Iran.","PeriodicalId":19372,"journal":{"name":"Novelty in Biomedicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"111-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novelty in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/NBM.V6I3.20813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As there is no valid questionnaire for assessing international hospital performance from providers’ perspective, this study aimed to develop a reliable as well as valid questionnaire for Iranian hospitals. M aterials and Methods: To develop the International Hospital Performance Assessment (IHPA) questionnaire, literature review did and comparative study conducted for extracting relevant items from twenty leader hospitals in all over the world. After that, to design the questionnaire and estimate its content validity index and ratio (CVI, CVR), 20 medical tourism experts selected. Then, questionnaire‘s construct validity (CVI & CVR) determined by using SPSS version 21 as well as exploratory factor analysis. Finally, reliability assessed by calculating Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. R es ults: The content validity of the questionnaire determined as (CVI= 0.85, CVR= 0.60). According to expert opinion 5 dimensions of the questionnaire selected from World Health Organization hospital performance framework, which were clinical effectiveness and patient safety, efficiency, patient centeredness, governance responsiveness and even staff orientation. Furthermore, results of exploratory factor analysis showed that the questionnaire contained 45 items and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.687. C onclusion: Results indicated that standard IHPA questionnaire with 45 items in 5 dimensions developed as a tool for measuring hospitals’ quality of care in Iran.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际医院绩效评估:编制问卷
背景:由于从提供者的角度评估国际医院绩效没有有效的问卷,本研究旨在为伊朗医院开发一份可靠且有效的问卷。材料与方法:编制国际医院绩效评估(IHPA)问卷,通过文献综述和比较研究,抽取世界20家领先医院的相关项目。之后,选取20名医疗旅游专家设计问卷,并估算其内容效度指数和比率(CVI, CVR)。然后,通过SPSS 21版和探索性因子分析确定问卷的结构效度(CVI和CVR)。最后,通过计算Cronbach 's alpha系数来评估可靠性。结果:确定问卷的内容效度为(CVI= 0.85, CVR= 0.60)。根据专家意见,问卷选取了世界卫生组织医院绩效框架中的5个维度,分别是临床有效性和患者安全性、效率、以患者为中心、治理响应性甚至员工导向。探索性因子分析结果显示,问卷共45个条目,Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.687。结论:结果表明,制定了5个维度45个项目的标准IHPA问卷,作为衡量伊朗医院护理质量的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unusual Airway Obstruction during General Anesthesia following Endotracheal Tube Cuff Herniation; A Case Report The Issue of Embryo Implantation in Women during the Coronavirus Outbreak: An Overview: Positive Result for SARS-CoV-2 RNA Test after a Long Time for the Patient with COVID-19 even after Discharge from the Hospital Investigating the Facilitating Factors of Drug Use Based on Personality and Ethnic Characteristics of Guilan Province Efficient of Toll‐Like Receptor 4 Knockout in Mouse Zygotes by CRISPER/Cas9:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1