Japanese Imperialism and the Investigation of Stone Age in Colonial Joseon

IF 0.3 0 ASIAN STUDIES Korean Studies Pub Date : 2021-07-30 DOI:10.1353/ks.2021.0009
Kisung Yi
{"title":"Japanese Imperialism and the Investigation of Stone Age in Colonial Joseon","authors":"Kisung Yi","doi":"10.1353/ks.2021.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The study of the Stone Age on the Korean peninsular began with Japanese researchers. Torii Ryuzo was the first archaeologist to take charge of and shape archaeological investigations of the Stone Age. However, the research results were used to defend the logic of imperialism rather than the academic domain. Torii used the past relationship between the Korean peninsula and Japan to locate the ancestral Japanese and provide evidence to support his \"theory of the common ancestral origins of Korean and Japanese races (日鮮同祖論 nissendosoron).\"Unlike Taiwan, in Chosŏn, which had a direct historical relationship with Japan, the results of archaeological investigations were only used as supporting materials to explain the prehistoric and ancient times of Japan, which in turn resulted in consolidating a colonial view of history (i.e., Korean history distorted by Japanese historians during the Japanese occupation). This is why it is difficult to deny the shadow of imperialism in the archaeology of colonial Chosŏn.","PeriodicalId":43382,"journal":{"name":"Korean Studies","volume":"2019 1","pages":"192 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ks.2021.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The study of the Stone Age on the Korean peninsular began with Japanese researchers. Torii Ryuzo was the first archaeologist to take charge of and shape archaeological investigations of the Stone Age. However, the research results were used to defend the logic of imperialism rather than the academic domain. Torii used the past relationship between the Korean peninsula and Japan to locate the ancestral Japanese and provide evidence to support his "theory of the common ancestral origins of Korean and Japanese races (日鮮同祖論 nissendosoron)."Unlike Taiwan, in Chosŏn, which had a direct historical relationship with Japan, the results of archaeological investigations were only used as supporting materials to explain the prehistoric and ancient times of Japan, which in turn resulted in consolidating a colonial view of history (i.e., Korean history distorted by Japanese historians during the Japanese occupation). This is why it is difficult to deny the shadow of imperialism in the archaeology of colonial Chosŏn.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本帝国主义与朝鲜殖民地石器时代的调查
摘要:朝鲜半岛石器时代的研究始于日本。龙藏鸟居是第一个负责和指导石器时代考古调查的考古学家。然而,这些研究成果被用来捍卫帝国主义的逻辑,而不是学术领域。鸟居利用朝鲜半岛和日本过去的关系来确定日本祖先的位置,并提供证据来支持他的“韩国和日本种族共同祖先起源理论”。与台湾不同的是,Chosŏn与日本有着直接的历史关系,考古调查的结果只被用作解释日本史前和古代的辅助材料,这反过来又导致了殖民历史观的巩固(即日本历史学家在日本占领期间歪曲了韩国历史)。这就是殖民考古中难以否认帝国主义阴影的原因Chosŏn。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Studies
Korean Studies ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Editor's Note "Wise Mothers," "Mom Bugs," and Pyŏngmat (Twisted Tastes): The Limits of Maternal Emotional Expression in South Korean Webtoons Ungrateful Refugees: North Korean Refugees in South Korea Views at Variance: Korean Women Disrupting and Subverting the Narrative of Protestant Missionary Women Through Moments of Difference, 1884–1910 The Discourse of Korean Han: Background and Historical Landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1