Non-Attendance to Post-Radiotherapy Follow-Up in Breast Cancer: Efficacy of Mail and Telephone Reminders

F. Bruns, Anne Caroline Knöchelmann, C. Henkenberens, H. Christiansen
{"title":"Non-Attendance to Post-Radiotherapy Follow-Up in Breast Cancer: Efficacy of Mail and Telephone Reminders","authors":"F. Bruns, Anne Caroline Knöchelmann, C. Henkenberens, H. Christiansen","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2020.08.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To assess the efficacy of two reminder interventions in improving post-radiotherapy followup attendance rates of breast cancer patients.\nMethods: Three periods of three months were assessed, a baseline period, an intervention period and a\nconfirmation period. In the intervention period, a two-step reminder system was used. This system consisted\nof a mail reminder (IV1) that was sent to all patients three to four weeks prior to the post-radiotherapy\nfollow-up visit, which was followed by up to two telephone calls (IV2) for all patients who did not attend\nthis follow-up visit. During the confirmation period, IV2 was used exclusively to assess the maximal\npossible efficacy of the telephone reminder.\nResults: The non-attendance rate of breast cancer patients was 18.1% (19/105) in the baseline period; this\nrate decreased to 13.1% in the intervention period (23/176; p=0.33) after IV1 and then decreased to 6.3%\n(11/176; p=0.03) after IV2. In the confirmation period, 24.4% (42/172) of breast cancer patients did not\nattend their post-radiotherapy follow-up visit; the non-attendance rate decreased significantly after\n(exclusive) IV2 from 24.4% (42/172) to 9.3% (16/172; p<0.001). Significance was observed for the first\ncall but not for the second call in the chi-square test.\nConclusion: Telephone reminder is an effective tool for improving breast cancer patient adherence to the\npost-radiotherapy follow-up visit. In this study, the telephone reminder system was more effective than the\nmail reminder system.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2020.08.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess the efficacy of two reminder interventions in improving post-radiotherapy followup attendance rates of breast cancer patients. Methods: Three periods of three months were assessed, a baseline period, an intervention period and a confirmation period. In the intervention period, a two-step reminder system was used. This system consisted of a mail reminder (IV1) that was sent to all patients three to four weeks prior to the post-radiotherapy follow-up visit, which was followed by up to two telephone calls (IV2) for all patients who did not attend this follow-up visit. During the confirmation period, IV2 was used exclusively to assess the maximal possible efficacy of the telephone reminder. Results: The non-attendance rate of breast cancer patients was 18.1% (19/105) in the baseline period; this rate decreased to 13.1% in the intervention period (23/176; p=0.33) after IV1 and then decreased to 6.3% (11/176; p=0.03) after IV2. In the confirmation period, 24.4% (42/172) of breast cancer patients did not attend their post-radiotherapy follow-up visit; the non-attendance rate decreased significantly after (exclusive) IV2 from 24.4% (42/172) to 9.3% (16/172; p<0.001). Significance was observed for the first call but not for the second call in the chi-square test. Conclusion: Telephone reminder is an effective tool for improving breast cancer patient adherence to the post-radiotherapy follow-up visit. In this study, the telephone reminder system was more effective than the mail reminder system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌放疗后不参加随访:邮件和电话提醒的效果
背景:评价两种提醒干预措施对提高乳腺癌患者放疗后随访出勤率的效果。方法:分为三个阶段,分别为基线期、干预期和确认期。在干预期间,采用两步提醒系统。该系统包括一封邮件提醒(IV1),在放疗后随访前三到四周发送给所有患者,随后对所有未参加本次随访的患者进行最多两次电话提醒(IV2)。在确认期间,专门使用IV2来评估电话提醒的最大可能功效。结果:基线期乳腺癌患者未出勤率为18.1% (19/105);在干预期间,这一比例降至13.1% (23/176;p=0.33),后降至6.3%(11/176;p=0.03)。确诊期间,24.4%(42/172)的乳腺癌患者未参加放疗后随访;(不含)IV2后的不出勤率由24.4%(42/172)显著下降至9.3% (16/172);p < 0.001)。在卡方检验中,第一次调用观察到显著性,但第二次调用没有观察到显著性。结论:电话提醒是提高乳腺癌患者放疗后随访依从性的有效手段。在本研究中,电话提醒系统比邮件提醒系统更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disseminated Thymic Carcinoma: Case Report and Discussion on Problems of Treatment What is the Obstetric Outcome with a Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia? Effects of DSPP and MMP20 Silencing on Key Signaling Pathways in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Multifaceted Networking of The Orphan Receptor Estrogen-Related Receptor Β in Breast Cancer Progression Current CT and MRI Applications in the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1