F. Bruns, Anne Caroline Knöchelmann, C. Henkenberens, H. Christiansen
{"title":"Non-Attendance to Post-Radiotherapy Follow-Up in Breast Cancer: Efficacy of Mail and Telephone Reminders","authors":"F. Bruns, Anne Caroline Knöchelmann, C. Henkenberens, H. Christiansen","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2020.08.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To assess the efficacy of two reminder interventions in improving post-radiotherapy followup attendance rates of breast cancer patients.\nMethods: Three periods of three months were assessed, a baseline period, an intervention period and a\nconfirmation period. In the intervention period, a two-step reminder system was used. This system consisted\nof a mail reminder (IV1) that was sent to all patients three to four weeks prior to the post-radiotherapy\nfollow-up visit, which was followed by up to two telephone calls (IV2) for all patients who did not attend\nthis follow-up visit. During the confirmation period, IV2 was used exclusively to assess the maximal\npossible efficacy of the telephone reminder.\nResults: The non-attendance rate of breast cancer patients was 18.1% (19/105) in the baseline period; this\nrate decreased to 13.1% in the intervention period (23/176; p=0.33) after IV1 and then decreased to 6.3%\n(11/176; p=0.03) after IV2. In the confirmation period, 24.4% (42/172) of breast cancer patients did not\nattend their post-radiotherapy follow-up visit; the non-attendance rate decreased significantly after\n(exclusive) IV2 from 24.4% (42/172) to 9.3% (16/172; p<0.001). Significance was observed for the first\ncall but not for the second call in the chi-square test.\nConclusion: Telephone reminder is an effective tool for improving breast cancer patient adherence to the\npost-radiotherapy follow-up visit. In this study, the telephone reminder system was more effective than the\nmail reminder system.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2020.08.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To assess the efficacy of two reminder interventions in improving post-radiotherapy followup attendance rates of breast cancer patients.
Methods: Three periods of three months were assessed, a baseline period, an intervention period and a
confirmation period. In the intervention period, a two-step reminder system was used. This system consisted
of a mail reminder (IV1) that was sent to all patients three to four weeks prior to the post-radiotherapy
follow-up visit, which was followed by up to two telephone calls (IV2) for all patients who did not attend
this follow-up visit. During the confirmation period, IV2 was used exclusively to assess the maximal
possible efficacy of the telephone reminder.
Results: The non-attendance rate of breast cancer patients was 18.1% (19/105) in the baseline period; this
rate decreased to 13.1% in the intervention period (23/176; p=0.33) after IV1 and then decreased to 6.3%
(11/176; p=0.03) after IV2. In the confirmation period, 24.4% (42/172) of breast cancer patients did not
attend their post-radiotherapy follow-up visit; the non-attendance rate decreased significantly after
(exclusive) IV2 from 24.4% (42/172) to 9.3% (16/172; p<0.001). Significance was observed for the first
call but not for the second call in the chi-square test.
Conclusion: Telephone reminder is an effective tool for improving breast cancer patient adherence to the
post-radiotherapy follow-up visit. In this study, the telephone reminder system was more effective than the
mail reminder system.