Book Review: Social Class in Europe. New Inequalities in the Old World

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research Pub Date : 2022-09-20 DOI:10.1177/10242589221123623
Élodie Béthoux
{"title":"Book Review: Social Class in Europe. New Inequalities in the Old World","authors":"Élodie Béthoux","doi":"10.1177/10242589221123623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is there such a thing as a European social space? If so, can we study it in terms of class analysis? What social inequalities would such a study reveal? French sociologists Cédric Hugrée, Étienne Penissat and Alexis Spire answer these questions in a synthetic and stimulating book based on three main assertions. Class distinctions matter; they play differently when considered on a European scale; and these differences are a key tool in understanding political conflict in and about Europe. Putting the European social space and its main divides at the heart of their project the authors take up a threefold methodological, sociological and political challenge. The book stands out first of all in terms of its innovative research design. Building on the vast international literature on class analysis – through works by Pierre Bourdieu, John H Goldthorpe, Mike Savage, David B Grusky or Daniel Oesch, to name but a few – the authors classify social classes and measure social inequalities in a multi-dimensional way that includes not only working but also living conditions. The book best illustrates the value of using the recent European SocioEconomic Groups (ESEG) classification to define social classes. Thanks to principal component analysis and clustering, the authors divide the European social space into three main classes – the working class, the middle class and the dominant class – whose characteristics and evolutions over the past decade are tracked down in the course of the book. Data on people in work (aged 25 to 65) are gathered and analysed from four combined Europe-wide surveys: the Labour Force Survey (LFS 2011 and 2014), the EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC 2006 and 2014) and the Adult Education Survey (AES 2011) from Eurostat, as well as Eurofound’s European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS 2015). The pros and cons of these various tools and surveys are briefly but usefully discussed in the introduction and the appendixes. Therefore the book is first a welcome invitation to further develop and discuss quantitative analyses of class structure at the European level. Then, mapping social classes and social inequalities in Europe represents a sociological challenge. The book draws a detailed and comprehensive portrait of Europeans, which will undoubtedly provide food for thought for any European comparative study. On this empirical foundation, the authors combine their own statistical results with concrete and telling examples taken from a variety of case studies (on Denmark, France, Greece, Hungary, Portugal, Romania, etc.) thus bringing together works that rarely discuss each other. In Chapters 1 to 3, the reader meets first of all the ‘weakened working class’, whose members share both social and economic vulnerability and are in competition with each other at the European level. Then comes the disparate ‘middle class’, disparate because of its diverse employment statuses, the gendered structure of occupations and the 1123623 TRS0010.1177/10242589221123623TransferBook Reviews research-article2022","PeriodicalId":23253,"journal":{"name":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"515 - 516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221123623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is there such a thing as a European social space? If so, can we study it in terms of class analysis? What social inequalities would such a study reveal? French sociologists Cédric Hugrée, Étienne Penissat and Alexis Spire answer these questions in a synthetic and stimulating book based on three main assertions. Class distinctions matter; they play differently when considered on a European scale; and these differences are a key tool in understanding political conflict in and about Europe. Putting the European social space and its main divides at the heart of their project the authors take up a threefold methodological, sociological and political challenge. The book stands out first of all in terms of its innovative research design. Building on the vast international literature on class analysis – through works by Pierre Bourdieu, John H Goldthorpe, Mike Savage, David B Grusky or Daniel Oesch, to name but a few – the authors classify social classes and measure social inequalities in a multi-dimensional way that includes not only working but also living conditions. The book best illustrates the value of using the recent European SocioEconomic Groups (ESEG) classification to define social classes. Thanks to principal component analysis and clustering, the authors divide the European social space into three main classes – the working class, the middle class and the dominant class – whose characteristics and evolutions over the past decade are tracked down in the course of the book. Data on people in work (aged 25 to 65) are gathered and analysed from four combined Europe-wide surveys: the Labour Force Survey (LFS 2011 and 2014), the EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC 2006 and 2014) and the Adult Education Survey (AES 2011) from Eurostat, as well as Eurofound’s European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS 2015). The pros and cons of these various tools and surveys are briefly but usefully discussed in the introduction and the appendixes. Therefore the book is first a welcome invitation to further develop and discuss quantitative analyses of class structure at the European level. Then, mapping social classes and social inequalities in Europe represents a sociological challenge. The book draws a detailed and comprehensive portrait of Europeans, which will undoubtedly provide food for thought for any European comparative study. On this empirical foundation, the authors combine their own statistical results with concrete and telling examples taken from a variety of case studies (on Denmark, France, Greece, Hungary, Portugal, Romania, etc.) thus bringing together works that rarely discuss each other. In Chapters 1 to 3, the reader meets first of all the ‘weakened working class’, whose members share both social and economic vulnerability and are in competition with each other at the European level. Then comes the disparate ‘middle class’, disparate because of its diverse employment statuses, the gendered structure of occupations and the 1123623 TRS0010.1177/10242589221123623TransferBook Reviews research-article2022
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:欧洲的社会阶层。旧世界的新不平等
欧洲社会空间这种东西存在吗?如果可以,我们是否可以从阶级分析的角度来研究它?这样的研究揭示了什么样的社会不平等?法国社会学家csamdric hugracei, Étienne Penissat和Alexis Spire在一本综合且令人振奋的书中基于三个主要观点回答了这些问题。阶级差别很重要;在欧洲范围内,他们的表现是不同的;这些差异是理解欧洲内部和有关欧洲的政治冲突的关键工具。将欧洲社会空间及其主要分歧置于其项目的核心,作者承担了方法论、社会学和政治三重挑战。这本书的突出之处首先在于其创新的研究设计。通过皮埃尔·布迪厄、约翰·H·戈德索普、迈克·萨维奇、大卫·B·格鲁斯基或丹尼尔·奥施等人的作品,作者们以大量的国际阶级分析文献为基础,对社会阶级进行分类,并以多维度的方式衡量社会不平等,不仅包括工作条件,还包括生活条件。这本书最好地说明了使用最近的欧洲社会经济群体(ESEG)分类来定义社会阶层的价值。通过主成分分析和聚类,作者将欧洲社会空间划分为三个主要阶级——工人阶级、中产阶级和统治阶级——在过去十年中,他们的特征和演变在书中得以追踪。工作人员(25至65岁)的数据收集和分析来自四个欧洲范围的联合调查:劳动力调查(LFS 2011年和2014年),欧盟收入和生活条件统计(EU- silc 2006年和2014年)和成人教育调查(AES 2011年)来自欧盟统计局,以及Eurofound的欧洲工作条件调查(EWCS 2015年)。这些不同的工具和调查的优点和缺点在引言和附录中进行了简要但有用的讨论。因此,这本书首先是一个受欢迎的邀请,以进一步发展和讨论阶级结构的定量分析在欧洲水平。那么,绘制欧洲的社会阶层和社会不平等是一项社会学挑战。这本书详细而全面地描绘了欧洲人的画像,这无疑将为任何欧洲比较研究提供思想食粮。在此经验基础上,作者将自己的统计结果与从各种案例研究(丹麦、法国、希腊、匈牙利、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚等)中获得的具体而生动的例子结合起来,从而将很少相互讨论的作品汇集在一起。在第1章到第3章中,读者首先遇到了“被削弱的工人阶级”,他们的成员在社会和经济上都很脆弱,并且在欧洲层面上彼此竞争。然后是不同的“中产阶级”,不同的原因在于其不同的就业状况、职业的性别结构和transferbook Reviews的研究文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Governing neo-nationalism, trade unions and industrial relations: the cases of Hungary and Poland From a handful of activists towards an organising subculture: institutionalisation of transnational union organising in Central and Eastern Europe Round Table. Implementing the EU Directive on adequate minimum wages in the Low Countries: the case of the Netherlands Promoting employed worker status on digital platforms: how France’s labour inspection and social security agencies address ‘uberisation’ Internalising precariousness: experiences of Georgian platform workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1