Development and Execution of Heritage Petroleum Company Limited’s First Offshore Workover Campaign - A Case History of Successful Implementation of Performance Management
{"title":"Development and Execution of Heritage Petroleum Company Limited’s First Offshore Workover Campaign - A Case History of Successful Implementation of Performance Management","authors":"Shazim K. Mohammed, D. Persad, K. Baksh","doi":"10.2118/200959-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Heritage Petroleum Company Limited (HPCL) is the newest operating oil and gas company in Trinidad and Tobago and was vested and entrusted with the operation and management of all the exploration and production assets of Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago Limited (\"Petrotrin\"). Being driven by oil-based revenue meant that rig intervention projects had to be innovative, economically viable and practical to meet the company’s financial commitments. This paper presents the concepts and processes behind the development and implementation of HPCL’s Workover Scoping and Procurement Framework.\n The offshore team recognized the need to frame the well review and workover candidate selection process as well as a procurement process that was both operationally accommodating and in accordance with public procurement regulations. This process would also have to be tested, since it was a new concept that was not practiced by Petrotrin.\n The well review process involved defining reservoir deliverability and in-place volumes through static and dynamic modelling, establishing current well potential and deliverability via nodal analysis with installed completion designs, topside infrastructure conditions and flow restrictions.\n The procurement process was achieved by identifying local resources and generating framework agreements for services and equipment. Job specific resources were tendered to ensure a transparent selection and award. The process also involved ranking the risks of all candidates. Economic analyses were performed to determine whether the financial indicators were positive to ensure viability of the campaign. A scorpion plot was also used to manage the performance of this framework during the campaign.\n The result was a campaign consisting of 15 wells that was delivered on time and within the workover budget. Actual production gain was over 1700 BOPD as opposed to the expected gain of 1450 BOPD. Budgeted Net Present Value (NPV) and actual NPV was calculated to be US$ 9.42 million dollars and US$ 11.7 million dollars respectively. All resources were demobilized and removed from the offshore acreage to reduce risks and floating expense to the company at the end of the campaign.","PeriodicalId":11142,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, June 30, 2021","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, June 30, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200959-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Heritage Petroleum Company Limited (HPCL) is the newest operating oil and gas company in Trinidad and Tobago and was vested and entrusted with the operation and management of all the exploration and production assets of Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago Limited ("Petrotrin"). Being driven by oil-based revenue meant that rig intervention projects had to be innovative, economically viable and practical to meet the company’s financial commitments. This paper presents the concepts and processes behind the development and implementation of HPCL’s Workover Scoping and Procurement Framework.
The offshore team recognized the need to frame the well review and workover candidate selection process as well as a procurement process that was both operationally accommodating and in accordance with public procurement regulations. This process would also have to be tested, since it was a new concept that was not practiced by Petrotrin.
The well review process involved defining reservoir deliverability and in-place volumes through static and dynamic modelling, establishing current well potential and deliverability via nodal analysis with installed completion designs, topside infrastructure conditions and flow restrictions.
The procurement process was achieved by identifying local resources and generating framework agreements for services and equipment. Job specific resources were tendered to ensure a transparent selection and award. The process also involved ranking the risks of all candidates. Economic analyses were performed to determine whether the financial indicators were positive to ensure viability of the campaign. A scorpion plot was also used to manage the performance of this framework during the campaign.
The result was a campaign consisting of 15 wells that was delivered on time and within the workover budget. Actual production gain was over 1700 BOPD as opposed to the expected gain of 1450 BOPD. Budgeted Net Present Value (NPV) and actual NPV was calculated to be US$ 9.42 million dollars and US$ 11.7 million dollars respectively. All resources were demobilized and removed from the offshore acreage to reduce risks and floating expense to the company at the end of the campaign.
Heritage Petroleum Company Limited (HPCL)是特立尼达和多巴哥最新运营的石油和天然气公司,被授予并受托经营和管理特立尼达和多巴哥有限公司(“Petrotrin”)的所有勘探和生产资产。受石油收入的驱动,钻井干预项目必须具有创新性、经济可行性和实用性,以满足公司的财务承诺。本文介绍了HPCL修井范围和采购框架开发和实施背后的概念和过程。海上团队认识到需要制定井评和修井候选选择流程,以及既能适应操作又符合公共采购法规的采购流程。由于这是Petrotrin没有实践过的新概念,这个过程也必须经过测试。井评过程包括通过静态和动态建模来确定储层的产能和原位体积,通过节点分析确定当前的井潜力和产能,并结合已安装的完井设计、上层基础设施条件和流动限制。采购过程是通过查明当地资源和拟订服务和设备框架协议来完成的。提供特定工作的资源,以确保甄选和授予透明。这个过程还包括对所有候选人的风险进行排名。进行了经济分析,以确定财务指标是否积极,以确保运动的可行性。在竞选期间,还使用了蝎子情节来管理该框架的性能。结果是,15口井的作业按时完成,并在修井预算范围内完成。实际产量增长超过1700桶/天,而不是预期的1450桶/天。预算净现值(NPV)和实际净现值分别为942万美元和1170万美元。在作业结束时,所有资源都被回收并从海上区域移除,以降低公司的风险和浮动费用。