CODING FOR CHILDREN – A WAY TO FULFILL THE AIMS OF THE OECD LEARNING COMPASS 2030?

Olaf Herden
{"title":"CODING FOR CHILDREN – A WAY TO FULFILL THE AIMS OF THE OECD LEARNING COMPASS 2030?","authors":"Olaf Herden","doi":"10.36315/2023v1end063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years two kind of publications were observable: On the one hand, there were many contributions arguing why every child should learn to code. Beside fascinating and motivating children for STEM (Science Technology Engineering Mathematics) topics and giving a good career preparation, coding also can strengthen general skills like e.g. resilience, creativity and organization. On the other hand, there exist several publications by the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) describing future skills for children as well as issues of future education and work. Particularly the OECD has developed the “OECD Learning Compass 2030”. This work is divided into several concepts. Each concept describes different skills being relevant for the children future. In this contribution, we want to compare, contrast and merge these two fields of publications. Therefore, we examine an extensive literature review and give an overview about skills that can be imparted by teaching children to code. Then we take a look at OECD’s compass and general skills. Therefore, we analyze the publications of OECD and apply text extraction to get relevant keywords of skills. Subsequently, we compare the coding skills with the OECD skills and look which aspects of the OECD compass can be fulfilled by teaching to code. As a result, we can note that attaining many of the OECD future skills can be supported by teaching children to code. We also have identified which skills cannot covered by coding resp. which additional benefits knowledge in coding offers. The paper concludes with a summary and an outlook. Future tasks are, e.g. examine at which age children should start learning to code, which are appropriate ways to teach and learn coding or concerning the question whether coding education should be realized as an one-size-fits-all approach or by applying internal differentiation.","PeriodicalId":93546,"journal":{"name":"Education and new developments","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and new developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v1end063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years two kind of publications were observable: On the one hand, there were many contributions arguing why every child should learn to code. Beside fascinating and motivating children for STEM (Science Technology Engineering Mathematics) topics and giving a good career preparation, coding also can strengthen general skills like e.g. resilience, creativity and organization. On the other hand, there exist several publications by the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) describing future skills for children as well as issues of future education and work. Particularly the OECD has developed the “OECD Learning Compass 2030”. This work is divided into several concepts. Each concept describes different skills being relevant for the children future. In this contribution, we want to compare, contrast and merge these two fields of publications. Therefore, we examine an extensive literature review and give an overview about skills that can be imparted by teaching children to code. Then we take a look at OECD’s compass and general skills. Therefore, we analyze the publications of OECD and apply text extraction to get relevant keywords of skills. Subsequently, we compare the coding skills with the OECD skills and look which aspects of the OECD compass can be fulfilled by teaching to code. As a result, we can note that attaining many of the OECD future skills can be supported by teaching children to code. We also have identified which skills cannot covered by coding resp. which additional benefits knowledge in coding offers. The paper concludes with a summary and an outlook. Future tasks are, e.g. examine at which age children should start learning to code, which are appropriate ways to teach and learn coding or concerning the question whether coding education should be realized as an one-size-fits-all approach or by applying internal differentiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为儿童编写代码——实现经合组织2030年学习指南目标的一种方式?
近年来,有两种出版物值得注意:一方面,有许多关于为什么每个孩子都应该学习编程的文章。除了吸引和激励孩子们学习STEM(科学技术工程数学)主题,并为他们的职业生涯做好准备外,编码还可以增强一般技能,如韧性、创造力和组织能力。另一方面,经合组织(经济合作与发展组织)有几份出版物描述了儿童未来的技能以及未来的教育和工作问题。特别是经合组织制定了“经合组织2030年学习指南”。这项工作分为几个概念。每个概念都描述了与孩子未来相关的不同技能。在这篇文章中,我们想要比较、对比和合并这两个领域的出版物。因此,我们进行了广泛的文献综述,并概述了通过教孩子编程可以传授的技能。然后我们来看看经合组织的指南和一般技能。因此,我们对OECD的出版物进行分析,并采用文本提取的方法得到相关的技能关键词。随后,我们将编码技能与经合组织的技能进行比较,看看经合组织指南针的哪些方面可以通过编码教学来实现。因此,我们可以注意到,通过教孩子编程,可以帮助他们获得经合组织的许多未来技能。我们还确定了哪些技能不能被编码人员覆盖。编码知识提供了哪些额外的好处。最后对全文进行了总结和展望。未来的任务是,例如检查儿童应该在什么年龄开始学习编码,哪些是教和学习编码的合适方法,或者考虑编码教育是应该采用一刀切的方法还是采用内部分化的方法来实现的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MEASURING SELF-REGULATED LEARNING IN STUDENTS WITH/WITHOUT CARE-RESPONSIBILITIES TO PUSH GENDER EQUITY DESIGN OF POWER ELECTRONIC SYSTEM WITH VARIABLE TOPOLOGY OF THE MAIN CIRCUIT FOR EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT OF LABORATORY EXERCISES OF POWER SEMICONDUCTOR CONVERTERS IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENHANCING STUDENT PREPAREDNESS FOR CLINICAL EXAMS CRITICAL REFLEXIVITY AS A TOOL FOR ADDRESSING INEQUITIES IN EDUCATION AND BEYOND CHALLENGES – TOWARDS CONTINUOUS PEER ASSESSMENT IN UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMING CLASSES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1