The Effect of Constitutional Commitment to Social Security on Social Expenditure Schemes

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Review of Law & Economics Pub Date : 2020-09-16 DOI:10.1515/RLE-2019-0051
E. Cammeraat
{"title":"The Effect of Constitutional Commitment to Social Security on Social Expenditure Schemes","authors":"E. Cammeraat","doi":"10.1515/RLE-2019-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper studies the effect of constitutional commitment to social security (CCSS) on different categories of social expenditure. For this purpose, we use a pooled cross sectional database for 17 EU-countries from 1990 till 2012. We run OLS models, 2SLS regression models and the Heckman two step model, using the rigidity of the constitution as instrumental variable to correct for possible endogeneity. A positive effect of constitutional commitment to social security is found on total social expenditure and on all four categories of social security spending: old age and survivor, incapacity, unemployment and active labor market policies (ALMPs). The largest effect sizes, expressed as a percentage of average spending, are found for expenditure on unemployment and ALMPs. This shows that constitutional commitment to social security has the largest effect on social expenditure schemes targeted at people who are perceived as less deserving by the public opinion.","PeriodicalId":44795,"journal":{"name":"Review of Law & Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Law & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/RLE-2019-0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract This paper studies the effect of constitutional commitment to social security (CCSS) on different categories of social expenditure. For this purpose, we use a pooled cross sectional database for 17 EU-countries from 1990 till 2012. We run OLS models, 2SLS regression models and the Heckman two step model, using the rigidity of the constitution as instrumental variable to correct for possible endogeneity. A positive effect of constitutional commitment to social security is found on total social expenditure and on all four categories of social security spending: old age and survivor, incapacity, unemployment and active labor market policies (ALMPs). The largest effect sizes, expressed as a percentage of average spending, are found for expenditure on unemployment and ALMPs. This shows that constitutional commitment to social security has the largest effect on social expenditure schemes targeted at people who are perceived as less deserving by the public opinion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会保障的宪法承诺对社会支出计划的影响
摘要本文研究了社会保障宪法承诺对不同类别社会支出的影响。为此,我们使用了一个汇集了17个欧盟国家从1990年到2012年的横向数据库。我们运行OLS模型,2SLS回归模型和Heckman两步模型,使用结构的刚性作为工具变量来纠正可能的内生性。宪法对社会保障的承诺对社会总支出和所有四类社会保障支出产生了积极影响:老年和幸存者、丧失工作能力、失业和积极的劳动力市场政策(ALMPs)。用平均支出的百分比来表示的最大效应大小是在失业和almp支出中发现的。这表明,宪法对社会保障的承诺对针对公众舆论认为不应得到社会保障的人的社会支出计划的影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
The Disavowal of Decisionism: Politically Motivated Exits from the U.S. Courts of Appeals On the Role of Sales Taxes for Efficient Compensation of Property Loss Under Strict Liability Broadband Internet and Crime Unraveling the Peltzman Effect: The Significance of Agent’s Type Do US State Breach Notification Laws Decrease Firm Data Breaches?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1