Editor’s Note

IF 0.1 N/A MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES I Tatti Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1086/718970
Jane Tylus
{"title":"Editor’s Note","authors":"Jane Tylus","doi":"10.1086/718970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this issue’s cover is a conversation. The painting, Il colloquio, by the Sicilian artist Renato Guttuso, isn’t in the Berenson collection by chance (fig. 1). When he painted it in 1952, Guttuso had known Bernard Berenson for at least several years; among his extant letters to Berenson is a postcard sent from Poland shortly after the war, with a photo ofWarsaw still in ruins. Painted while Guttuso was staying at the Neapolitan villa of Berenson’s friend ClotildeMarghieri, this image of two women deep in intimate conversation was dedicated to Berenson, as can be seen from an inscription on the back. Given the vague if suggestive setting, this encounter could be happening anywhere—even on the hills of the Vincigliata. Berenson was hardly the only Renaissance art historian with whomGuttuso was in frequent contact during the 1940s and 50s. Another was Roberto Longhi, who along with Berenson was one of the “due massimi ‘guru’ della critica d’arte italiana del ’900,” as Maria Cristina Carratù puts it in her review of Guttuso e gli amici di Corrente, an exhibition held in honor of Guttuso’s centenary. Longhi’s and Berenson’s connections to Italian Renaissance art may not have influenced the painter’s esteem for them one way or the other, or necessarily shaped his work. But as Carl Strehlke has pointed out, Guttuso was particularly fond of Caravaggio, with whose memorable works he contrasted (unfavorably) the unrealistic abstractness of contemporary art—a comparison Berenson and Longhi made as well. Roughly a decade after Il colloquio, a new movement appeared in the art world: Arte Povera, a term coined by the young Germano Celant. It flourished in no small part because of “colloqui” between artists and critics, as Teresa Kittler argues in her essay on Celant. And this conversation frequently invoked Renaissance art as a pathway to creativity, as Kittler demonstrates the extent to which Celant relied on the work of his erstwhile teacher, the art historian Eugenio Battisti. Celant’s “conversations” with Battisti himself as well as with his books produced a strong affirmation of the materiality of Arte Povera, its immersion within and connection to a natural world typified by forces beyond the artist’s control: magic, the elements, organic","PeriodicalId":42173,"journal":{"name":"I Tatti Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I Tatti Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/718970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of this issue’s cover is a conversation. The painting, Il colloquio, by the Sicilian artist Renato Guttuso, isn’t in the Berenson collection by chance (fig. 1). When he painted it in 1952, Guttuso had known Bernard Berenson for at least several years; among his extant letters to Berenson is a postcard sent from Poland shortly after the war, with a photo ofWarsaw still in ruins. Painted while Guttuso was staying at the Neapolitan villa of Berenson’s friend ClotildeMarghieri, this image of two women deep in intimate conversation was dedicated to Berenson, as can be seen from an inscription on the back. Given the vague if suggestive setting, this encounter could be happening anywhere—even on the hills of the Vincigliata. Berenson was hardly the only Renaissance art historian with whomGuttuso was in frequent contact during the 1940s and 50s. Another was Roberto Longhi, who along with Berenson was one of the “due massimi ‘guru’ della critica d’arte italiana del ’900,” as Maria Cristina Carratù puts it in her review of Guttuso e gli amici di Corrente, an exhibition held in honor of Guttuso’s centenary. Longhi’s and Berenson’s connections to Italian Renaissance art may not have influenced the painter’s esteem for them one way or the other, or necessarily shaped his work. But as Carl Strehlke has pointed out, Guttuso was particularly fond of Caravaggio, with whose memorable works he contrasted (unfavorably) the unrealistic abstractness of contemporary art—a comparison Berenson and Longhi made as well. Roughly a decade after Il colloquio, a new movement appeared in the art world: Arte Povera, a term coined by the young Germano Celant. It flourished in no small part because of “colloqui” between artists and critics, as Teresa Kittler argues in her essay on Celant. And this conversation frequently invoked Renaissance art as a pathway to creativity, as Kittler demonstrates the extent to which Celant relied on the work of his erstwhile teacher, the art historian Eugenio Battisti. Celant’s “conversations” with Battisti himself as well as with his books produced a strong affirmation of the materiality of Arte Povera, its immersion within and connection to a natural world typified by forces beyond the artist’s control: magic, the elements, organic
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editor’s音符
本期封面的主题是一段对话。这幅由西西里艺术家雷纳托·古图索(Renato Guttuso)创作的《Il colloquio》并非偶然出现在贝伦森的收藏中(图1)。当古图索在1952年画这幅画时,他已经认识伯纳德·贝伦森至少好几年了;在他写给贝伦森的现存信件中,有一张战后不久从波兰寄来的明信片,上面有一张华沙的照片,当时华沙仍是一片废墟。这幅画是古图索住在贝伦森的朋友克洛蒂尔德·马格利的那不勒斯别墅时画的,从背后的铭文可以看出,这幅画描绘了两个女人在亲密地交谈,是献给贝伦森的。考虑到这个模糊而暗示性的场景,这种相遇可能发生在任何地方——甚至在文奇利亚塔的山上。在20世纪40年代和50年代,贝伦森并不是唯一一个与古图索经常接触的文艺复兴时期艺术史学家。另一位是罗伯托·隆吉(Roberto Longhi),正如玛丽亚·克里斯蒂娜(Maria Cristina) Carratù在评论古图索(Guttuso e gli amici di Corrente)百周年纪念展览时所说的那样,他与贝伦森(Berenson)是“900年意大利艺术批判大师”之一。隆吉和贝伦森与意大利文艺复兴时期艺术的联系可能不会影响画家对他们的尊重,也不一定会影响他的作品。但正如卡尔·斯特雷尔克所指出的,古图索特别喜欢卡拉瓦乔,他与卡拉瓦乔的令人难忘的作品(不利地)对比了当代艺术的不现实的抽象——贝伦森和隆吉也做了这样的比较。在“对话”之后大约十年,艺术界出现了一场新的运动:贫穷艺术(Arte Povera),这个词是年轻的杰马诺·切兰特(Germano Celant)创造的。正如特蕾莎·基特勒(Teresa Kittler)在她关于Celant的文章中所说,它的繁荣在很大程度上是因为艺术家和评论家之间的“对话”。这段对话经常提到文艺复兴时期的艺术是通往创造力的途径,正如基特勒所展示的那样,切朗在很大程度上依赖于他以前的老师、艺术历史学家尤金尼奥·巴蒂斯蒂(Eugenio Battisti)的作品。Celant与Battisti本人以及他的书的“对话”产生了对贫穷艺术的物质性的强烈肯定,它沉浸在自然世界中并与自然世界联系在一起,这种自然世界以艺术家无法控制的力量为代表:魔法,元素,有机
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
I Tatti Studies
I Tatti Studies MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Caravaggio, Alberti, and Narcissan Disegno Editor’s Note Islands in Flux: Migration and Ecological Change in Early Modern Isolari (Books of Islands) Cellini’s Dog Parchment, Gilding, and God: Gold Leaf and Divine Connection in a Camaldolese Choir Book
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1