{"title":"Development of an Easy-fitting Ankle-foot Orthosis: A Comparison with Two Existing Orthoses","authors":"Masato Migita, H. Maruyama","doi":"10.1589/rika.30.967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Purpose] A prototype easy-fitting ankle-foot orthosis (EF-AFO) was constructed and its fitting time was compared with two types of existing orthoses to investigate whether or not it was easy to put on. [Subjects] The subjects were 21 healthy adults (13 males, 8 females). [Methods] The two measured items were the times taken to secure the ankle belt, and the 3 belts securing the ankle, lower leg, and instep. In addition, after the measurements, a paper questionnaire was used to evaluate ease of affixation, external appearance, heaviness, and fixation, for each of the three types of orthosis, on a 4-point scale; ease of affixation was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). [Results] There was no significant difference between the fitting times of the EF-AFO and the easy-ring plastic AFO, but in the comparison with the conventional plastic AFO with a belt, the EF-AFO could be fitted faster. There were no significant differences among the AFOs, according to the results of the paper questionnaire; however, the VAS value showed the prototype EF-AFO was difficult to put on. [Conclusion] The prototype EF-AFO had a shorter fitting time than the conventional plastic AFO with a belt, but according to the subjective assessment, it wasn’t easy to put on.","PeriodicalId":35899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exercise Physiology Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exercise Physiology Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1589/rika.30.967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
[Purpose] A prototype easy-fitting ankle-foot orthosis (EF-AFO) was constructed and its fitting time was compared with two types of existing orthoses to investigate whether or not it was easy to put on. [Subjects] The subjects were 21 healthy adults (13 males, 8 females). [Methods] The two measured items were the times taken to secure the ankle belt, and the 3 belts securing the ankle, lower leg, and instep. In addition, after the measurements, a paper questionnaire was used to evaluate ease of affixation, external appearance, heaviness, and fixation, for each of the three types of orthosis, on a 4-point scale; ease of affixation was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). [Results] There was no significant difference between the fitting times of the EF-AFO and the easy-ring plastic AFO, but in the comparison with the conventional plastic AFO with a belt, the EF-AFO could be fitted faster. There were no significant differences among the AFOs, according to the results of the paper questionnaire; however, the VAS value showed the prototype EF-AFO was difficult to put on. [Conclusion] The prototype EF-AFO had a shorter fitting time than the conventional plastic AFO with a belt, but according to the subjective assessment, it wasn’t easy to put on.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Exercise Physiologyonline, published by the American Society of Exercise Physiologists, is a professional peer reviewed Internet-based journal devoted to original research in exercise physiology. The journal is directed by the Editor-In-Chief with supporting editorial assistance via Associate Editors knowledgeable in the field of exercise physiology. JEPonline is the first electronic peer reviewed exercise physiology journal in the history of the profession.