Relationship of orbital dimensions and facial angles with thumbprints ridge count among hausa ethnic group of Nigeria

L. Adamu, S. Ojo, B. Danborno, S. Adebisi, M. Taura
{"title":"Relationship of orbital dimensions and facial angles with thumbprints ridge count among hausa ethnic group of Nigeria","authors":"L. Adamu, S. Ojo, B. Danborno, S. Adebisi, M. Taura","doi":"10.4103/JECA.JECA_41_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Higher level of uniqueness exhibited by fingerprints and face across different individuals, sex, and population may suggest that there could be some mechanisms that control the two simultaneously. Objectives: The objectives of the study were to determine the correlation between thumbprint ridge counts with facial distances and angles and to predict the facial distances and angles from thumbprints ridge counts among Hausa Ethnic Group. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The study population comprises 457 participants. The ridged count was determined from ulnar, radial, and proximal areas of the thumbs. The facial distances and angles were measured from two-dimensional images. Pearson's correlation and stepwise multiple regression analyses were used for relationship and prediction, respectively. Results: It was observed that in males, a significant negative correlation was observed between left orbital height and radial ridge counts. The right and left proximal ridge counts were found to correlate negatively with interocular distances and left orbital width, respectively. The nasion angle significantly correlated negatively with right ulnar ridge counts and proximal ridge counts, whereas the left proximal ridge count correlated positively with proximal ridge counts. In females, only the right and left ulnar ridge counts correlated negatively and positively with nasomental angle and right orbital width, respectively. Facial angles were predicted from ulnar ridge counts in both sexes. In females, the left ulnar ridge count predicts the right orbital height and width. The left and right orbital heights were best predicted by left proximal ridge count. Conclusion: The thumbprint ridge count correlates with facial distances and angles. Different types of facial dimensions and angles can be predicted from thumbprint ridge counts.","PeriodicalId":15815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental and Clinical Anatomy","volume":"7 1","pages":"46 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental and Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JECA.JECA_41_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Higher level of uniqueness exhibited by fingerprints and face across different individuals, sex, and population may suggest that there could be some mechanisms that control the two simultaneously. Objectives: The objectives of the study were to determine the correlation between thumbprint ridge counts with facial distances and angles and to predict the facial distances and angles from thumbprints ridge counts among Hausa Ethnic Group. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The study population comprises 457 participants. The ridged count was determined from ulnar, radial, and proximal areas of the thumbs. The facial distances and angles were measured from two-dimensional images. Pearson's correlation and stepwise multiple regression analyses were used for relationship and prediction, respectively. Results: It was observed that in males, a significant negative correlation was observed between left orbital height and radial ridge counts. The right and left proximal ridge counts were found to correlate negatively with interocular distances and left orbital width, respectively. The nasion angle significantly correlated negatively with right ulnar ridge counts and proximal ridge counts, whereas the left proximal ridge count correlated positively with proximal ridge counts. In females, only the right and left ulnar ridge counts correlated negatively and positively with nasomental angle and right orbital width, respectively. Facial angles were predicted from ulnar ridge counts in both sexes. In females, the left ulnar ridge count predicts the right orbital height and width. The left and right orbital heights were best predicted by left proximal ridge count. Conclusion: The thumbprint ridge count correlates with facial distances and angles. Different types of facial dimensions and angles can be predicted from thumbprint ridge counts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚豪萨族眼眶尺寸、面部角度与指纹脊数的关系
背景:指纹和面部在不同的个体、性别和人群中表现出更高的独特性,这可能表明可能存在一些同时控制两者的机制。目的:研究豪萨族的指纹脊数与面部距离和角度的关系,并利用指纹脊数预测豪萨族的面部距离和角度。材料和方法:这是一项横断面研究。研究人群包括457名参与者。脊状数从拇指尺骨、桡骨和近端区域测定。从二维图像中测量面部距离和角度。分别采用Pearson相关分析和逐步多元回归分析进行关系分析和预测分析。结果:男性左眼眶高度与桡骨脊数呈显著负相关。右、左近端脊数分别与眼间距离和左眶宽呈负相关。鼻角与右尺脊数和近端尺脊数呈显著负相关,而与左尺脊数呈正相关。在女性中,只有左右尺脊计数分别与鼻鼻角和右眶宽呈负相关和正相关。面部角度由两性尺骨脊数预测。在女性中,左尺脊数预示着右眼眶的高度和宽度。左侧近端脊数是预测左右眶高度的最佳指标。结论:指纹脊数与面部距离和角度相关。从指纹脊数可以预测不同类型的面部尺寸和角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of aqueous leaf extract of Chromolaena odorata on petrol-induced bronchiectasis in adult Wistar rats. Effects of aqueous rhizome extract of Zingiber officinale on arsenic trioxide-induced spleen damage in adult Wistar rats. Histological changes in the trachea of the adult Wistar rat following exposure to cement dust Relationship between external ear morphometry and stature among Hausa population from selected tertiary institutions in Kano metropolis, Nigeria. Tramadol induces alterations in the cognitive function and histoarchitectural features of the hippocampal formation in adult Wistar rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1