Is tapering or discontinuation of biologic treatment in patients with radiographic and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis reasonable? : A local cohort study.

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 MINERALOGY Mineralogical Magazine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-07 DOI:10.1007/s00393-022-01226-0
Halil Harman, Nedim Kaban
{"title":"Is tapering or discontinuation of biologic treatment in patients with radiographic and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis reasonable? : A local cohort study.","authors":"Halil Harman, Nedim Kaban","doi":"10.1007/s00393-022-01226-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We retrospectively determined factors predicting biologic treatment discontinuation or tapering in patients with axSpA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included 63 nonradiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and 138 radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) patients on biologic treatments for at least 1 year. The biologic dosing intervals were increased in patients who had been in remission for at least 6 months. In patients whose biologic dosing intervals could be increased by 100% for at least 6 months, the agents were stopped at the end of that time. In patients for whom the biologic agents were stopped or tapered, relapse was defined as a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease activity index score > 4 and a CRP level > 10 mg/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median duration of biologic treatment (all patients) was 2 (1-11) years. Logistic regression analysis did not identify any independent predictor of treatment discontinuation. NSAID use was the only independent predictor of tapering (p = 0.001). The time to relapse after tapering was shorter in patients with r‑axSpA than nr-axSpA (25.97 vs. 39.53 months; p = 0.05). The time to relapse in patients with r‑axSpA was considerably shorter than that in patients with nr-axSpA (5.14 vs. 13 months; p = 0.001). All r‑axSpA patients relapsed over the follow-up period; only 2 nr-axSpA patients did not relapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most significant independent predictor of relapse was NSAID use during treatment. For axSpA patients in remission, tapering of the biologic dosing intervals is more appropriate than discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18618,"journal":{"name":"Mineralogical Magazine","volume":"1 1","pages":"55-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineralogical Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-022-01226-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MINERALOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We retrospectively determined factors predicting biologic treatment discontinuation or tapering in patients with axSpA.

Materials and methods: We included 63 nonradiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and 138 radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) patients on biologic treatments for at least 1 year. The biologic dosing intervals were increased in patients who had been in remission for at least 6 months. In patients whose biologic dosing intervals could be increased by 100% for at least 6 months, the agents were stopped at the end of that time. In patients for whom the biologic agents were stopped or tapered, relapse was defined as a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease activity index score > 4 and a CRP level > 10 mg/L.

Results: The median duration of biologic treatment (all patients) was 2 (1-11) years. Logistic regression analysis did not identify any independent predictor of treatment discontinuation. NSAID use was the only independent predictor of tapering (p = 0.001). The time to relapse after tapering was shorter in patients with r‑axSpA than nr-axSpA (25.97 vs. 39.53 months; p = 0.05). The time to relapse in patients with r‑axSpA was considerably shorter than that in patients with nr-axSpA (5.14 vs. 13 months; p = 0.001). All r‑axSpA patients relapsed over the follow-up period; only 2 nr-axSpA patients did not relapse.

Conclusion: The most significant independent predictor of relapse was NSAID use during treatment. For axSpA patients in remission, tapering of the biologic dosing intervals is more appropriate than discontinuation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射学和非放射学轴性脊柱关节炎患者减量或停止生物制剂治疗是否合理? :一项地方队列研究。
目的我们回顾性地确定了预测轴索硬化症患者停止或减少生物制剂治疗的因素:我们纳入了 63 名接受生物制剂治疗至少 1 年的非放射性轴索硬化症(nr-axSpA)和 138 名放射性轴索硬化症(r-axSpA)患者。缓解至少 6 个月的患者的生物制剂给药间隔有所延长。如果患者的生物制剂给药间隔可以在至少 6 个月内增加 100%,则在这段时间结束时停止给药。在停用或减量使用生物制剂的患者中,巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数大于 4 分和 CRP 水平大于 10 mg/L 即为复发:所有患者接受生物制剂治疗的中位时间为2(1-11)年。逻辑回归分析未发现任何独立的中断治疗预测因素。使用非甾体抗炎药是唯一能预测减药的独立因素(p = 0.001)。r-axSpA患者减药后复发的时间比nr-axSpA患者短(25.97个月对39.53个月;p = 0.05)。r-axSpA患者的复发时间大大短于nr-axSpA患者(5.14个月对13个月;p = 0.001)。所有r-axSpA患者在随访期间都复发了,只有2名nr-axSpA患者没有复发:结论:治疗期间使用非甾体抗炎药是最重要的复发独立预测因素。对于处于缓解期的 axSpA 患者,缩短生物制剂的给药间隔比停药更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mineralogical Magazine
Mineralogical Magazine 地学-矿物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
25.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mineralogical Magazine is an international journal of mineral sciences which covers the fields of mineralogy, crystallography, geochemistry, petrology, environmental geology and economic geology. The journal has been published continuously since the founding of the Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland in 1876 and is a leading journal in its field.
期刊最新文献
Composition and paragenesis of daqingshanite from the Kamthai carbothermalite, Rajasthan, India The crystal structure of charmarite – the first case of a 11 × 11 Å superstructure mesh in layered double hydroxides Ebnerite and epiebnerite: NH4ZnPO4 dimorphs with zeolite-type frameworks from the Rowley mine, Arizona, USA Immobilisation of chromium in magnesium carbonate minerals Similarities and differences among selected gemmological varieties of chalcedony: chemistry, mineralogy and microstructure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1