Early Criterion to Screen Maize Varieties for Their Tolerance to Aluminium Toxic Soil

D. Mapiemfu-Lamaré, S. Ndindeng, A. F. Ngome, C. Zonkeng, M. Mfopou, Lovelyn Bihnchang, Francis Etame
{"title":"Early Criterion to Screen Maize Varieties for Their Tolerance to Aluminium Toxic Soil","authors":"D. Mapiemfu-Lamaré, S. Ndindeng, A. F. Ngome, C. Zonkeng, M. Mfopou, Lovelyn Bihnchang, Francis Etame","doi":"10.5923/J.IJAF.20120204.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tolerance to aluminum toxicity in maize is usually determined after harvesting. This screening process takes place rather too late in the growth stage of the plant and is not economical. In order to speed up the screening of maize va- rieties for their tolerance to aluminum toxicity in Cameroon, a parameter that could be easily detected early in the plant growth stage was investigated. Thirteen (13) maize varieties were evaluated in pots containing aluminum toxic soil and amended soil (less acidic). There were two experimental blocks and the maize varieties were arranged in a completely ran- domized block design with three replications. Young plants were carefully off rooted twenty-one (21) days after planting and soluble phenolic compounds quantified. The results suggested that, phenolic compound production varied with maize variety and the soil type. The amount of phenolic compounds produced on aluminum toxic soil was higher (10.44 x 103µg) than that produced on amended soil with high organic content (6.60 x 103µg) (P< 0.0005). Using LSDs of phenolic compound se- cretion, the 13 varieties were classified into three groups (tolerant, fairly tolerant and sensitive). Ten (10) varieties were tolerant, two were fairly tolerant and one was susceptible. Varieties 91105, 87036, CLA 18, CML 254, CML 247 that were previously unclassified were classified as tolerant to Al toxicity. Variety Exp1 24 that was previously classified as sensitive using using the yield, the interval between anthers and the silk and length of seminal roots was also classified as tolerant using \"intact\" plants growing under natural conditions confirming that discrepancies may occur when only one method is used for screening. The quantity of phenolic compounds produced in the presence of aluminum could be effectively used to classify maize varieties as tolerant, fairly tolerant and susceptible to soil aluminum toxicity.","PeriodicalId":13804,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry","volume":"262 1","pages":"161-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5923/J.IJAF.20120204.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Tolerance to aluminum toxicity in maize is usually determined after harvesting. This screening process takes place rather too late in the growth stage of the plant and is not economical. In order to speed up the screening of maize va- rieties for their tolerance to aluminum toxicity in Cameroon, a parameter that could be easily detected early in the plant growth stage was investigated. Thirteen (13) maize varieties were evaluated in pots containing aluminum toxic soil and amended soil (less acidic). There were two experimental blocks and the maize varieties were arranged in a completely ran- domized block design with three replications. Young plants were carefully off rooted twenty-one (21) days after planting and soluble phenolic compounds quantified. The results suggested that, phenolic compound production varied with maize variety and the soil type. The amount of phenolic compounds produced on aluminum toxic soil was higher (10.44 x 103µg) than that produced on amended soil with high organic content (6.60 x 103µg) (P< 0.0005). Using LSDs of phenolic compound se- cretion, the 13 varieties were classified into three groups (tolerant, fairly tolerant and sensitive). Ten (10) varieties were tolerant, two were fairly tolerant and one was susceptible. Varieties 91105, 87036, CLA 18, CML 254, CML 247 that were previously unclassified were classified as tolerant to Al toxicity. Variety Exp1 24 that was previously classified as sensitive using using the yield, the interval between anthers and the silk and length of seminal roots was also classified as tolerant using "intact" plants growing under natural conditions confirming that discrepancies may occur when only one method is used for screening. The quantity of phenolic compounds produced in the presence of aluminum could be effectively used to classify maize varieties as tolerant, fairly tolerant and susceptible to soil aluminum toxicity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛选玉米品种耐铝毒性土壤的早期标准
玉米对铝毒性的耐受性通常在收获后确定。这种筛选过程在植物生长阶段进行得太晚,而且不经济。为了加快对喀麦隆耐铝毒性玉米品种的筛选,研究了一个在植物生长早期容易检测到的参数。13个玉米品种在含铝毒性土壤和改质土壤(酸性较弱)的盆栽中进行了评价。试验采用2个试验区,玉米品种按3个重复完全随机化的试验区设计。幼苗在种植21天后小心地脱根,定量测定可溶性酚类化合物。结果表明,酚类化合物产量因玉米品种和土壤类型而异。铝中毒土壤中酚类化合物的产生量(10.44 × 103µg)高于高有机质改良土壤(6.60 × 103µg) (P< 0.0005)。利用酚类化合物分泌的lsd将13个品种分为耐、较耐和敏感3组。10个品种具有耐受性,2个具有相当耐受性,1个敏感。此前未分类的品种91105、87036、cla18、CML 254、CML 247均为耐铝品种。以前用产量、花药与丝之间的间隔和种子根的长度被分类为敏感品种的品种exp124也被分类为在自然条件下生长的“完整”植株的耐受性,这证实了当只使用一种方法进行筛选时可能会出现差异。在铝的存在下产生的酚类化合物的数量可以有效地用于区分玉米品种对土壤铝毒性的耐受性、相当耐受性和易感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Farm Subsidy in North Texas Region Exploring Cocoa Farm Land Use in the West African Region Analyzing changing trends in forest land areas of Mississippi. Effect of Temperature and Time Torrefaction on the Energetic Properties of Bracatinga Wood Analysis of Solid Waste Generation in a Wood Processing Machine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1