Role of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat—A Multimodality-Based Comparative Study of Diagnostic Performance in a Tertiary Care Institute

S. Patil, Seetharaman Cannane, S. Poyyamoli, Rinoy R. Anand, V. Kasi
{"title":"Role of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat—A Multimodality-Based Comparative Study of Diagnostic Performance in a Tertiary Care Institute","authors":"S. Patil, Seetharaman Cannane, S. Poyyamoli, Rinoy R. Anand, V. Kasi","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1731964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective To evaluate the accuracy of noninvasive imaging methods including gray-scale ultrasound, ultrasound shear wave elastography, unenhanced computed tomography (CT), and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using three-dimensional (3D) multiecho multipoint chemical shift–encoded spoiled gradient echo (q-DIXON) sequence in the quantification of hepatic steatosis, with proton MR spectroscopy (H1-MRS) as the reference standard in Indian population. Methods Our study included 100 consecutive adult patients referred to the department of radiology in our hospital for imaging of liver. Fat content of liver was recorded using MRI (H1-MRS and q-DIXON), unenhanced CT (average liver attenuation [ALI] and liver attenuation index [LAI]) and ultrasonography (USG) (gray-scale grading and shear wave elastography [SWE]). Data were analyzed by linear regression and Bland–Altman analysis for each technique compared with H1-MRS. The diagnostic performances of all the methods were compared using DeLong test, for detection of mild and moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis, separately. Results MRI q-DIXON PDFF showed excellent correlation (r = 0.917, r2 = 0.840) and strong agreement (1.48 ±3.01) with H1-MRS-derived PDFF measurements. Unenhanced CT-based methods showed moderate correlation with modest agreement (r = −0.826, r2 = 0.681, −40.18 ± 16.05 for ALI and r = −0.858, r2 = 0.735, 13.4 ± 15.3 for LAI) whereas USG gray-scale assessment showed low correlation (weighted Kappa value 0.366) with H1-MRS PDFF. No correlation was found between USG-SWE results and PDFF measured with H1-MRS. Comparison of areas under curve (AUCs) using DeLong test revealed that MRI q-DIXON method performed the best for diagnosis of hepatic steatosis compared with rest. For moderate to severe steatosis, MRI q-DIXON and unenhanced CT-based methods had comparable diagnostic performance with AUCs not showing statistically significant differences. Conclusion MRI q-DIXON shows strongest correlation with MRS and should be preferred for estimation of hepatic fat, especially when MRS is not available. Unenhanced CT shows limited diagnostic performance in detecting mild steatosis; however, it certainly has a role in diagnosing moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis, such as evaluating donor candidates for living donor liver transplantation. USG, using both the traditional four-grade visual assessment and elastography in the present form, appears to have limited role in liver fat quantification.","PeriodicalId":52666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the accuracy of noninvasive imaging methods including gray-scale ultrasound, ultrasound shear wave elastography, unenhanced computed tomography (CT), and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using three-dimensional (3D) multiecho multipoint chemical shift–encoded spoiled gradient echo (q-DIXON) sequence in the quantification of hepatic steatosis, with proton MR spectroscopy (H1-MRS) as the reference standard in Indian population. Methods Our study included 100 consecutive adult patients referred to the department of radiology in our hospital for imaging of liver. Fat content of liver was recorded using MRI (H1-MRS and q-DIXON), unenhanced CT (average liver attenuation [ALI] and liver attenuation index [LAI]) and ultrasonography (USG) (gray-scale grading and shear wave elastography [SWE]). Data were analyzed by linear regression and Bland–Altman analysis for each technique compared with H1-MRS. The diagnostic performances of all the methods were compared using DeLong test, for detection of mild and moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis, separately. Results MRI q-DIXON PDFF showed excellent correlation (r = 0.917, r2 = 0.840) and strong agreement (1.48 ±3.01) with H1-MRS-derived PDFF measurements. Unenhanced CT-based methods showed moderate correlation with modest agreement (r = −0.826, r2 = 0.681, −40.18 ± 16.05 for ALI and r = −0.858, r2 = 0.735, 13.4 ± 15.3 for LAI) whereas USG gray-scale assessment showed low correlation (weighted Kappa value 0.366) with H1-MRS PDFF. No correlation was found between USG-SWE results and PDFF measured with H1-MRS. Comparison of areas under curve (AUCs) using DeLong test revealed that MRI q-DIXON method performed the best for diagnosis of hepatic steatosis compared with rest. For moderate to severe steatosis, MRI q-DIXON and unenhanced CT-based methods had comparable diagnostic performance with AUCs not showing statistically significant differences. Conclusion MRI q-DIXON shows strongest correlation with MRS and should be preferred for estimation of hepatic fat, especially when MRS is not available. Unenhanced CT shows limited diagnostic performance in detecting mild steatosis; however, it certainly has a role in diagnosing moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis, such as evaluating donor candidates for living donor liver transplantation. USG, using both the traditional four-grade visual assessment and elastography in the present form, appears to have limited role in liver fat quantification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高级MRI技术在肝脏脂肪定量评估中的作用——基于多模式的三级医疗机构诊断性能比较研究
目的以印度人群为研究对象,以质子磁共振波谱(H1-MRS)为参考标准,利用三维(3D)多回波多点化学位移编码的失稳梯度回波(q-DIXON)序列,评价灰度超声、超声剪切波弹性成像、非增强计算机断层扫描(CT)和质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)等非侵入性成像方法在磁共振成像(MRI)上定量肝脏脂肪变性的准确性。方法本研究纳入100例连续到我院放射科进行肝脏影像学检查的成年患者。采用MRI (H1-MRS和q-DIXON)、非增强CT(平均肝衰减指数[ALI]和肝衰减指数[LAI])和超声(灰度分级和横波弹性成像[SWE])记录肝脏脂肪含量。将各技术与H1-MRS进行线性回归和Bland-Altman分析。采用DeLong试验分别对轻度和中重度肝脂肪变性的诊断性能进行比较。结果MRI q-DIXON PDFF与h1 - mrs衍生PDFF具有良好的相关性(r = 0.917, r2 = 0.840),一致性强(1.48±3.01)。基于未增强ct的方法与H1-MRS PDFF的相关性中等(r =−0.826,r2 = 0.681,−40.18±16.05),与LAI的相关性为r =−0.858,r2 = 0.735, 13.4±15.3),而USG灰度评估与H1-MRS PDFF的相关性较低(加权Kappa值0.366)。USG-SWE结果与H1-MRS测量的PDFF无相关性。DeLong试验对比曲线下面积(auc)显示,MRI q-DIXON法对肝脂肪变性的诊断效果优于其他方法。对于中度至重度脂肪变性,MRI q-DIXON和未增强的基于ct的方法与auc的诊断性能相当,没有统计学上的显著差异。结论MRI q-DIXON与MRS的相关性最强,尤其在没有MRS的情况下,应优先用于肝脏脂肪的评估。CT平增强对轻度脂肪变性的诊断价值有限;然而,它在诊断中度至重度肝脂肪变性方面确实有作用,例如评估活体肝移植的候选供体。USG,使用传统的四级视觉评估和目前形式的弹性成像,似乎在肝脏脂肪量化中的作用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Computed Tomography Scan Correlation of Position of Appendix with Present Literature Duplication of Gallbladder Amidst Out of the Ordinary Associated Anomalies Role of Ga68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer Imaging Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Status and Future Directions Childhood Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: Acute Presentation of an Uncommon Tumor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1