Aspirin, low molecular weight heparin, or both in preventing pregnancy complications in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and factor V Leiden mutation

Cihan Karadağ, B. Akar, G. Gönenç, R. Aslancan, Nagihan Yılmaz, E. Çalışkan
{"title":"Aspirin, low molecular weight heparin, or both in preventing pregnancy complications in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and factor V Leiden mutation","authors":"Cihan Karadağ, B. Akar, G. Gönenç, R. Aslancan, Nagihan Yılmaz, E. Çalışkan","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2019.1671348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), LMWH plus low dose aspirin, or low dose aspirin only on pregnancy outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients with factor V Leiden mutation (FVLM). Materials and methods: A total of 2764 RPL patients were evaluated in for the etiology of RPL. Mutations in factor V Leiden homozygous and heterozygous were determined. Subsequently, 196 of these patients were diagnosed with FVLM and included in the study; of these 174 completed the study. At the sixth week of gestation of subsequent pregnancy participants were randomly distributed into three groups. Group A (n = 61) was composed of patients with an oral dose of 100 mg aspirin daily, Group B (n = 59) consisted of patients using 40 mg enoxaparin and 100 mg orally aspirin daily, and Group C (n = 54) included patients using 40 mg enoxaparin daily during pregnancy. Results: Among the 174 patients who completed the study, the live birth and miscarriage rates were similar for the three groups (p = .843 and p = .694, respectively). There was no significant difference among the groups in rates of eclampsia, placental abruption, intrauterine fetal growth restriction and gestational diabetes mellitus. The number of preeclamptic patients was significantly higher in Group A than Groups B and C. The levels of preterm birth was significantly higher in Group A than Groups B and C. Conclusion: Using low dose aspirin, LMWH plus aspirin, or LMWH alone yielded comparable live birth rates in RPL patients with FVLM. However, LMWH decreased the risk of preeclampsia in this group of patients. LMWH might therefore have a preventive role regarding preeclampsia.","PeriodicalId":22921,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"116 1","pages":"1934 - 1939"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1671348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), LMWH plus low dose aspirin, or low dose aspirin only on pregnancy outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients with factor V Leiden mutation (FVLM). Materials and methods: A total of 2764 RPL patients were evaluated in for the etiology of RPL. Mutations in factor V Leiden homozygous and heterozygous were determined. Subsequently, 196 of these patients were diagnosed with FVLM and included in the study; of these 174 completed the study. At the sixth week of gestation of subsequent pregnancy participants were randomly distributed into three groups. Group A (n = 61) was composed of patients with an oral dose of 100 mg aspirin daily, Group B (n = 59) consisted of patients using 40 mg enoxaparin and 100 mg orally aspirin daily, and Group C (n = 54) included patients using 40 mg enoxaparin daily during pregnancy. Results: Among the 174 patients who completed the study, the live birth and miscarriage rates were similar for the three groups (p = .843 and p = .694, respectively). There was no significant difference among the groups in rates of eclampsia, placental abruption, intrauterine fetal growth restriction and gestational diabetes mellitus. The number of preeclamptic patients was significantly higher in Group A than Groups B and C. The levels of preterm birth was significantly higher in Group A than Groups B and C. Conclusion: Using low dose aspirin, LMWH plus aspirin, or LMWH alone yielded comparable live birth rates in RPL patients with FVLM. However, LMWH decreased the risk of preeclampsia in this group of patients. LMWH might therefore have a preventive role regarding preeclampsia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿司匹林、低分子肝素或两者在预防复发性妊娠丢失和V Leiden因子突变妇女妊娠并发症中的作用
摘要目的:本研究旨在比较低分子肝素(LMWH)、低分子肝素联合低剂量阿司匹林或仅使用低剂量阿司匹林对复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)因子V Leiden突变(FVLM)患者妊娠结局的影响。材料与方法:对2764例RPL患者进行病因分析。测定了V - Leiden因子纯合子和杂合子的突变。随后,其中196名患者被诊断为FVLM并纳入研究;其中174人完成了研究。在妊娠第6周,参与者被随机分为三组。A组(n = 61)由每日口服100mg阿司匹林的患者组成,B组(n = 59)由每日口服40mg依诺肝素和100mg阿司匹林的患者组成,C组(n = 54)包括妊娠期间每日口服40mg依诺肝素的患者。结果:在完成研究的174例患者中,三组的活产率和流产率相似(p =。843和p =。694年,分别)。子痫、胎盘早剥、宫内胎儿生长受限、妊娠期糖尿病发生率组间比较差异无统计学意义。A组子痫前期患者数量明显高于B组和c组,A组早产水平明显高于B组和c组。结论:低剂量阿司匹林、低分子肝素加阿司匹林或单独使用低分子肝素对FVLM RPL患者的活产率相当。然而,低分子肝素降低了这组患者子痫前期的风险。因此低分子肝素可能对子痫前期有预防作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of specialty training and physician attitudes on fetal cardiac counseling Fetoplacental unit involvement in uric acid production in women with severe preeclampsia: a prospective case control pilot study. Causal association of sex hormone-binding globulin on gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study Targeted metabolomic analysis of early-trimester serum identifies potential mechanisms for late-onset preeclampsia Statement of retraction: effect of daily consumption of probiotic yoghurt on lipid profiles in pregnant women: a randomized controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1