Comparative Effects of Coated Compound and Mono-component Proteases on Growth Performance and Nutritional Efficiency in Broiler Diets

S. Chandrasekar, P. Das, Y. Bashir, M. Karthigan, S. Saravanan
{"title":"Comparative Effects of Coated Compound and Mono-component Proteases on Growth Performance and Nutritional Efficiency in Broiler Diets","authors":"S. Chandrasekar, P. Das, Y. Bashir, M. Karthigan, S. Saravanan","doi":"10.17265/2161-6256/2017.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protease as feed additive is being used in poultry production as a partial replacement for protein sources for cost efficiency and reducing nitrogen excretion. However, diverse proteases may yield different responses under field conditions. A pellet diet study was conducted in Cobb broilers to assess the impact of coated compound (CC) and mono-component (MC) proteases with 5% replacement of digestible amino acids and 0.9% crude protein. Birds fed positive control diet had a better growth than those fed negative control diet, regardless of enzyme supplementation. However, CC protease had shown feed conversion ratio (FCR) like control in a reformulated diet, whereas negative control and MC protease missed to gain the feed conversion. In measures of nutritional efficiency, like energy efficiency, protein efficiency and amino acids efficiency (lysine and methionine), the CC protease proved to be better than MC protease. In terms of European efficiency factor (EEF), control and CC protease elicited a closer response, whereas the other two groups showed a drop. In this study, CC protease allowed partial substitution of digestible amino acids and crude protein, while maintaining feed efficiency and animal performance. It could be concluded that incorporating CC proteases is an efficient choice to maximize the utilization feed material resources and efficiency in animal protein production.","PeriodicalId":14977,"journal":{"name":"Journal of agricultural science & technology A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of agricultural science & technology A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6256/2017.06.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Protease as feed additive is being used in poultry production as a partial replacement for protein sources for cost efficiency and reducing nitrogen excretion. However, diverse proteases may yield different responses under field conditions. A pellet diet study was conducted in Cobb broilers to assess the impact of coated compound (CC) and mono-component (MC) proteases with 5% replacement of digestible amino acids and 0.9% crude protein. Birds fed positive control diet had a better growth than those fed negative control diet, regardless of enzyme supplementation. However, CC protease had shown feed conversion ratio (FCR) like control in a reformulated diet, whereas negative control and MC protease missed to gain the feed conversion. In measures of nutritional efficiency, like energy efficiency, protein efficiency and amino acids efficiency (lysine and methionine), the CC protease proved to be better than MC protease. In terms of European efficiency factor (EEF), control and CC protease elicited a closer response, whereas the other two groups showed a drop. In this study, CC protease allowed partial substitution of digestible amino acids and crude protein, while maintaining feed efficiency and animal performance. It could be concluded that incorporating CC proteases is an efficient choice to maximize the utilization feed material resources and efficiency in animal protein production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包被复合蛋白酶与单组分蛋白酶对肉鸡日粮生长性能和营养效率的影响
蛋白酶作为饲料添加剂在家禽生产中被用作部分替代蛋白质来源,以提高成本效益和减少氮排泄。然而,不同的蛋白酶在野外条件下可能产生不同的反应。本试验采用颗粒饲粮,以5%的可消化氨基酸和0.9%的粗蛋白质替代包被复合蛋白酶(CC)和单组分蛋白酶(MC)对科布肉仔鸡的影响。无论是否添加酶,饲喂正对照饲粮的雏鸟生长均优于饲喂负对照饲粮的雏鸟。然而,在重新配制的饲料中,CC蛋白酶表现出与对照组相似的饲料转化率,而阴性对照组和MC蛋白酶则未能获得饲料转化率。在能量效率、蛋白质效率和氨基酸(赖氨酸和蛋氨酸)效率等营养效率指标上,CC蛋白酶优于MC蛋白酶。在欧洲效率因子(EEF)方面,对照组和CC蛋白酶引起的反应更接近,而其他两组则有所下降。在本研究中,CC蛋白酶可以部分替代可消化氨基酸和粗蛋白质,同时保持饲料效率和动物生产性能。由此可见,添加CC蛋白酶是提高饲料资源利用率和动物蛋白生产效率的有效选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Study: Promoting Sustainable Energy Greenhouse Heating Systems to Small-Scale Local Farms The Discovery of a Green Wood Beetle Diastocera trifasciata (Coleoptera: Lamiinae) on Mango Tree in South Sudan Integrated Water Resources Management in the Sandougou Catchment Area (Senegal): Going beyond Soil Defence and Restoration (SDR) Application of Symmetric Ploughs for Tillage on Wetland Paddy Fields Evaluation of a Fermented Millet Product of Bacillus subtilis ATCC 55033 as Potential in Biocontrol of Bacteriosis (Xanthomonas axonopodis) in Gulupa (Passiflora edulis Sims)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1