A Security Theater of Dreams: Supporters’ Responses to “Safety” and “Security” Following the Old Trafford “Fake Bomb” Evacuation

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Sport & Social Issues Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI:10.1177/0193723519881202
J. Ludvigsen, P. Millward
{"title":"A Security Theater of Dreams: Supporters’ Responses to “Safety” and “Security” Following the Old Trafford “Fake Bomb” Evacuation","authors":"J. Ludvigsen, P. Millward","doi":"10.1177/0193723519881202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On May 15, 2016, reports emerged of a “suspect package” inside Old Trafford minutes before kick-off in Manchester United’s game versus Bournemouth. The “suspect package,” causing a full-scale evacuation, and match postponement, turned out to be a “fake bomb” accidently left following a security exercise. Minimal social research investigates responses from supporters to “security” and “safety” at large sports events. Although the “suspect package,” fortunately, never “materialized,” it represents an important case in English football. Theoretically, this study adopts a frame analysis technique pioneered by Erving Goffman and it empirically examines supporters’ responses to security during the chaotic hours of the “fake bomb” incident, as articulated on an interactive message board. Overall, supporters were satisfied with police and security management’s handling of the incident, although it was questioned how the “fake bomb” was not detected. Importantly, supporters agreed that “safety comes first.”","PeriodicalId":47636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport & Social Issues","volume":"12 1","pages":"21 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport & Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723519881202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

On May 15, 2016, reports emerged of a “suspect package” inside Old Trafford minutes before kick-off in Manchester United’s game versus Bournemouth. The “suspect package,” causing a full-scale evacuation, and match postponement, turned out to be a “fake bomb” accidently left following a security exercise. Minimal social research investigates responses from supporters to “security” and “safety” at large sports events. Although the “suspect package,” fortunately, never “materialized,” it represents an important case in English football. Theoretically, this study adopts a frame analysis technique pioneered by Erving Goffman and it empirically examines supporters’ responses to security during the chaotic hours of the “fake bomb” incident, as articulated on an interactive message board. Overall, supporters were satisfied with police and security management’s handling of the incident, although it was questioned how the “fake bomb” was not detected. Importantly, supporters agreed that “safety comes first.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全剧院的梦想:老特拉福德“假炸弹”疏散后支持者对“安全”和“安全”的回应
2016年5月15日,在曼联对阵伯恩茅斯的比赛开始前几分钟,老特拉福德球场出现了一个“可疑包裹”的报道。这个“可疑包裹”导致了全面撤离,比赛推迟,结果是一个在安全演习后意外留下的“假炸弹”。很少有社会研究调查大型体育赛事中支持者对“安全”和“安全”的反应。幸运的是,尽管“可疑包裹”从未“成为现实”,但它代表了英国足球界的一个重要案例。从理论上讲,本研究采用了欧文·戈夫曼(Erving Goffman)开创的框架分析技术,并实证检验了支持者在“假炸弹”事件的混乱时刻对安全的反应,正如互动留言板上所阐述的那样。总体而言,支持者对警方和安全管理部门对事件的处理感到满意,尽管有人质疑为何没有发现“假炸弹”。重要的是,支持者同意“安全第一”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Journal of Sport & Social Issues is an indispensable resource that brings together the latest research, discussion, and analysis on contemporary sport issues such as race, media, gender, economics, drugs, recruiting, injuries, and youth sports. Using an international, interdisciplinary perspective, Journal of Sport & Social Issues examines today"s most pressing and far-reaching questions about sport, including: World Cup soccer, gay experience and sport, social issues in sport management, youth sports, sports subcultures. Always provocative, Journal of Sports and Social Issues presents a lively public discussion of the impact of sport on social issues from many perspectives.
期刊最新文献
“Stick to Sports” and Critical Sports Media Industry Studies “The World Cup of Empowerment” and “They Really Missed the Ball”: Gender Discourses at the 2019 Women’s World Cup CrossFit and "Cancel Culture": Probing Practitioners' Responses to the "Canceling" of Greg Glassman. Women's Physical Activity as Becoming: Lines of Flight from the Fitness Assemblage A Descriptive Look at the Mental Health Literacy of Student-Athletes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1