A Competence-Based Course Authoring Concept for Learning Platforms with Legacy Assignment Tools

M. Then, B. Wallenborn, Birgit R. Ianniello, Duc Binh Vu, T. Swoboda, Michael Fuchs, M. Hemmje
{"title":"A Competence-Based Course Authoring Concept for Learning Platforms with Legacy Assignment Tools","authors":"M. Then, B. Wallenborn, Birgit R. Ianniello, Duc Binh Vu, T. Swoboda, Michael Fuchs, M. Hemmje","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.321287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is concerned with several of the most important aspects of Competence-Based Learning (CBL): course authoring, assignments, and categorization of learning content. The latter is part of the so-called Bologna Process (BP) and can effectively be supported by integrating knowledge resources like, e.g., standardized skill and competence taxonomies into the target implementation approach, aiming at making effective use of an open integration architecture while fostering the interoperability of hybrid knowledge-based e-learning solutions. Modern scenarios ask for interoperable software solutions to seamlessly integrate existing e-learning infrastructures and legacy tools with innovative technologies while being cognitively efficient to handle. In this way, prospective users are enabled to use them without learning overheads. At the same time, methods of Learning Design (LD) in combination with CBL are getting more and more important for production and maintenance of easy to facilitate solutions. We present our approach of developing a competence-based course-authoring and assignment support software. It is bridging the gaps between contemporary Learning Management Systems (LMS) and established legacy learning infrastructures by embedding existing resources via Learning Tools Interoperability (LTI). Furthermore, the underlying conceptual architecture for this integration approach will be explained. In addition, a competence management structure based on knowledge technologies supporting standardized skill and competence taxonomies will be introduced. The overall goal is to develop a software solution which will not only flawlessly merge into a legacy platform and several other learning environments, but also remain intuitively usable. As a proof of concept, the so-called platform independent conceptual architecture model will be validated by a concrete use case scenario.","PeriodicalId":91079,"journal":{"name":"GSTF international journal on computing","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSTF international journal on computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.321287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper is concerned with several of the most important aspects of Competence-Based Learning (CBL): course authoring, assignments, and categorization of learning content. The latter is part of the so-called Bologna Process (BP) and can effectively be supported by integrating knowledge resources like, e.g., standardized skill and competence taxonomies into the target implementation approach, aiming at making effective use of an open integration architecture while fostering the interoperability of hybrid knowledge-based e-learning solutions. Modern scenarios ask for interoperable software solutions to seamlessly integrate existing e-learning infrastructures and legacy tools with innovative technologies while being cognitively efficient to handle. In this way, prospective users are enabled to use them without learning overheads. At the same time, methods of Learning Design (LD) in combination with CBL are getting more and more important for production and maintenance of easy to facilitate solutions. We present our approach of developing a competence-based course-authoring and assignment support software. It is bridging the gaps between contemporary Learning Management Systems (LMS) and established legacy learning infrastructures by embedding existing resources via Learning Tools Interoperability (LTI). Furthermore, the underlying conceptual architecture for this integration approach will be explained. In addition, a competence management structure based on knowledge technologies supporting standardized skill and competence taxonomies will be introduced. The overall goal is to develop a software solution which will not only flawlessly merge into a legacy platform and several other learning environments, but also remain intuitively usable. As a proof of concept, the so-called platform independent conceptual architecture model will be validated by a concrete use case scenario.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有遗留作业工具的学习平台的基于能力的课程创作概念
本文关注能力学习(CBL)的几个最重要的方面:课程编写、作业和学习内容的分类。后者是所谓的博洛尼亚进程(Bologna Process, BP)的一部分,可以通过将知识资源(例如,标准化技能和能力分类)整合到目标实施方法中来有效支持,旨在有效利用开放式集成架构,同时促进基于知识的混合电子学习解决方案的互操作性。现代场景需要可互操作的软件解决方案,以便将现有的电子学习基础设施和遗留工具与创新技术无缝集成,同时具有认知效率。通过这种方式,潜在用户可以在没有学习开销的情况下使用它们。与此同时,学习设计(Learning Design, LD)与CBL相结合的方法对于生产和维护易于操作的解决方案变得越来越重要。我们提出了开发基于能力的课程创作和作业支持软件的方法。它通过学习工具互操作性(LTI)嵌入现有资源,弥合了当代学习管理系统(LMS)与已建立的传统学习基础设施之间的差距。此外,还将解释这种集成方法的基本概念体系结构。此外,还将介绍一种基于知识技术的能力管理结构,支持标准化的技能和能力分类。总体目标是开发一种软件解决方案,它不仅可以完美地合并到遗留平台和其他几个学习环境中,而且还可以直观地使用。作为概念的证明,所谓的平台独立概念架构模型将通过具体的用例场景进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cognitive Computing supported Medical Decision Support System for Patient’s Driving Assessment Propaganda Barometer : A Supportive Tool to Improve Media Literacy Towards Building a Critically Thinking Society A framework for the adoption of bring your own device (BYOD) in the hospital environment On developing adaptive vocabulary learning game for children with an early language delay Stroke Cognitive Medical Assistant (StrokeCMA)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1