Increasing the Cost Effectiveness of Mechanically Lined Pipe for Risers Installed by Reel-Lay

R. Jones, G. Toguyeni, James Hymers, Peter Tanscheit, Nelson Bittar Romeu, Venu Rao, J. Banse
{"title":"Increasing the Cost Effectiveness of Mechanically Lined Pipe for Risers Installed by Reel-Lay","authors":"R. Jones, G. Toguyeni, James Hymers, Peter Tanscheit, Nelson Bittar Romeu, Venu Rao, J. Banse","doi":"10.4043/31325-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The use of mechanically lined pipe (MLP) using a thin liner, i.e. 2.5mm, can provide a more cost effective linepipe material solution relative to a standard 3.0mm liner. This is especially the case for the more expensive liner materials with higher corrosion resistance, including Alloy 625. Thin liners, i.e. 2.5mm, can be used without compromising pipeline integrity and performance, whilst still fulfilling design requirements defined in most pipeline design standards, including DNVGL-ST-F101. The suitability of 2.5mm liner MLP has previously been demonstrated in service over a range of pipeline bundle projects installed with the controlled depth tow method, but not to date for risers installed by reel-lay. This paper presents the details and test results of the qualification programme to support its use for both flowlines and risers installed by reel-lay.\n The qualification MLP test pipes, which comprised an outer diameter (OD) 219.1mm × wall thickness (WT) 15.9mm X65 + 2.5mm Alloy 625, were manufactured using established manufacturing procedures and facilities. Reeling and fatigue test strings were fabricated using qualified welding solutions. The fabricated test strings were subject to internal visual inspection and dimensional measurement using laser metrology in order to provide a benchmark for comparison post reeling. The test strings were given a simulated reeling procedure using bending and straightening formers representative of a reel-lay vessel with the smallest reel hub diameter, this being a conservative material straining condition. An internal pressurisation technique, as per standard installation practice for the present pipe lay contractor for MLP, was applied during the simulated reeling procedure. Post reeling the internal laser metrology inspection procedure was repeated in order to confirm the integrity of the liner and to check for the presence of any evidence of liner wrinkling or damage. Subsequently, full scale fatigue testing was performed using the high frequency resonance bending procedure. Testing was performed to ultimate failure to determine the fatigue endurance limit of the thin liner MLP.\n Additionally Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was performed to further validate the satisfactory reeling performance of the thin liner MLP. The FE numerical analysis embraced manufacture of the MLP pipe and test samples coupled with the reeling procedure. Sensitivity analysis on pipe strength and geometrical mismatch was performed to demonstrate the robustness of the linepipe material solution and reeling procedure.\n All of the critical qualification activities were performed and verified by DNVGL and in accordance with the guidance of DNVGL-RP-A203 Technology Qualification process.\n The paper highlights the qualification programme performed to enable the cost effective use of thin liner MLP, specifically Alloy 625, for risers installed by reel-lay.","PeriodicalId":11084,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, August 19, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, August 19, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31325-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of mechanically lined pipe (MLP) using a thin liner, i.e. 2.5mm, can provide a more cost effective linepipe material solution relative to a standard 3.0mm liner. This is especially the case for the more expensive liner materials with higher corrosion resistance, including Alloy 625. Thin liners, i.e. 2.5mm, can be used without compromising pipeline integrity and performance, whilst still fulfilling design requirements defined in most pipeline design standards, including DNVGL-ST-F101. The suitability of 2.5mm liner MLP has previously been demonstrated in service over a range of pipeline bundle projects installed with the controlled depth tow method, but not to date for risers installed by reel-lay. This paper presents the details and test results of the qualification programme to support its use for both flowlines and risers installed by reel-lay. The qualification MLP test pipes, which comprised an outer diameter (OD) 219.1mm × wall thickness (WT) 15.9mm X65 + 2.5mm Alloy 625, were manufactured using established manufacturing procedures and facilities. Reeling and fatigue test strings were fabricated using qualified welding solutions. The fabricated test strings were subject to internal visual inspection and dimensional measurement using laser metrology in order to provide a benchmark for comparison post reeling. The test strings were given a simulated reeling procedure using bending and straightening formers representative of a reel-lay vessel with the smallest reel hub diameter, this being a conservative material straining condition. An internal pressurisation technique, as per standard installation practice for the present pipe lay contractor for MLP, was applied during the simulated reeling procedure. Post reeling the internal laser metrology inspection procedure was repeated in order to confirm the integrity of the liner and to check for the presence of any evidence of liner wrinkling or damage. Subsequently, full scale fatigue testing was performed using the high frequency resonance bending procedure. Testing was performed to ultimate failure to determine the fatigue endurance limit of the thin liner MLP. Additionally Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was performed to further validate the satisfactory reeling performance of the thin liner MLP. The FE numerical analysis embraced manufacture of the MLP pipe and test samples coupled with the reeling procedure. Sensitivity analysis on pipe strength and geometrical mismatch was performed to demonstrate the robustness of the linepipe material solution and reeling procedure. All of the critical qualification activities were performed and verified by DNVGL and in accordance with the guidance of DNVGL-RP-A203 Technology Qualification process. The paper highlights the qualification programme performed to enable the cost effective use of thin liner MLP, specifically Alloy 625, for risers installed by reel-lay.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高卷筒敷设立管机械衬管的成本效益
与标准的3.0mm衬管相比,使用2.5mm薄衬管的机械衬管(MLP)可以提供更具成本效益的管道材料解决方案。对于更昂贵的耐腐蚀性更高的衬垫材料,包括Alloy 625,情况尤其如此。2.5mm的薄衬管可以在不影响管道完整性和性能的情况下使用,同时仍然满足大多数管道设计标准(包括DNVGL-ST-F101)中定义的设计要求。2.5mm尾管MLP的适用性已经在一系列管束项目中得到了验证,这些管束项目采用了控制深度拖曳法,但迄今为止,对于采用卷筒铺设法安装的立管还没有得到验证。本文介绍了验证程序的细节和测试结果,以支持其在卷筒敷设的管线和立管中的使用。合格MLP测试管由外径(OD) 219.1mm ×壁厚(WT) 15.9mm X65 + 2.5mm Alloy 625组成,使用既定的制造程序和设备制造。用合格的焊接溶液制作卷绕和疲劳测试管柱。制作的测试串进行内部目视检查和尺寸测量使用激光计量,以便提供一个基准比较后缫丝。在保守的材料应变条件下,使用代表最小卷筒轮毂直径的卷筒船的弯曲和矫直机对测试串进行模拟卷取过程。在模拟缫丝过程中,根据MLP目前管道铺设承包商的标准安装实践,采用了内部加压技术。后缫丝内部激光计量检查程序,以确认完整性的衬垫,并检查是否存在任何衬垫起皱或损坏的证据。随后,采用高频共振弯曲程序进行了全尺寸疲劳试验。进行了极限失效试验,确定了薄壁MLP的疲劳耐久性极限。此外,通过有限元分析进一步验证了薄板MLP令人满意的卷绕性能。有限元数值分析包括MLP管材的制造过程和试验样品,以及缫丝过程。通过对管道强度和几何失配的敏感性分析,验证了管道材料溶液和卷取过程的鲁棒性。所有关键的鉴定活动均由DNVGL按照DNVGL- rp - a203技术鉴定流程的指导进行并验证。本文重点介绍了为使薄衬管MLP(特别是625合金)在卷绕式立管中具有成本效益而进行的鉴定程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Qualification of Barrier Fluidless, Sealless Seawater Canned Motor Pumps Hull Condition Monitoring and Lifetime Estimation by the Combination of On-Board Sensing and Digital Twin Technology Unconventional Approach Simplifies Steel Catenary Riser Decommissioning InspectTM Computed Tomography for NDT of Subsea Pipelines Novel Active Slug Control in Angola - Development & Field Results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1