Implementing patient navigator programmes within a hospital setting in Toronto, Canada: A qualitative interview study

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Services Research & Policy Pub Date : 2022-05-20 DOI:10.1177/13558196221103662
K. Kokorelias, Sarah Gould, Tracey Das Gupta, Naomi Ziegler, D. Cass, S. Hitzig
{"title":"Implementing patient navigator programmes within a hospital setting in Toronto, Canada: A qualitative interview study","authors":"K. Kokorelias, Sarah Gould, Tracey Das Gupta, Naomi Ziegler, D. Cass, S. Hitzig","doi":"10.1177/13558196221103662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study sought to identify the organisation and system level barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of patient navigator programmes in one acute care hospital system in Toronto, Canada. Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and analysed thematically. Results: Thirty-eight individuals participated in interviews (17 community, 21 acute care hospital), including 24 frontline clinicians and 14 programme directors, health care leaders and managers. Implementation of patient navigator programmes was dependent on: (1) a clear consensus on the unique need for patient navigators; (2) champions to promote patient navigation; (3) programme ownership and accountability; (4) external system and organisational landscape and (5) implementation climate. Appropriate mechanisms of communication were found to have impacted each factor as a barrier or facilitator to programme implementation. Conclusion: Strategies for implementing patient navigator programmes into hospital clinical practice should include incorporating evidence to support the programme, considering mechanisms to enable collaborative communication, and the integration of frameworks to facilitate programme integration into the current practices within the organisation.","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":"124 1","pages":"313 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196221103662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to identify the organisation and system level barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of patient navigator programmes in one acute care hospital system in Toronto, Canada. Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and analysed thematically. Results: Thirty-eight individuals participated in interviews (17 community, 21 acute care hospital), including 24 frontline clinicians and 14 programme directors, health care leaders and managers. Implementation of patient navigator programmes was dependent on: (1) a clear consensus on the unique need for patient navigators; (2) champions to promote patient navigation; (3) programme ownership and accountability; (4) external system and organisational landscape and (5) implementation climate. Appropriate mechanisms of communication were found to have impacted each factor as a barrier or facilitator to programme implementation. Conclusion: Strategies for implementing patient navigator programmes into hospital clinical practice should include incorporating evidence to support the programme, considering mechanisms to enable collaborative communication, and the integration of frameworks to facilitate programme integration into the current practices within the organisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在加拿大多伦多的一家医院实施病人导航员方案:一项定性访谈研究
目的:本研究旨在确定组织和系统层面的障碍和促进因素,影响患者导航员计划在加拿大多伦多的一个急症护理医院系统的实施。方法:采用定性描述方法,采用实施研究综合框架。通过深度访谈收集数据并进行主题分析。结果:38人参加了访谈(17个社区,21个急症护理医院),包括24名一线临床医生和14名方案主任、卫生保健领导和管理人员。患者导航员计划的实施取决于:(1)对患者导航员独特需求的明确共识;(2)冠军促进患者导航;(3)项目所有权和问责制;(4)外部系统和组织景观;(5)实施环境。发现适当的沟通机制对每一个因素都有影响,成为方案执行的障碍或促进因素。结论:在医院临床实践中实施患者导航员方案的策略应包括纳入支持方案的证据,考虑实现协作沟通的机制,以及整合框架以促进方案融入组织内的当前实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
期刊最新文献
Health care utilization and costs among coordinated care patients in Southeastern Ontario: A difference-in-differences study of a double propensity score-matched cohort. The role of collaborative governance in translating national cancer programs into network-based practices: A longitudinal case study in Canada. How can specialist investigation agencies inform system-wide learning for patient safety? A qualitative study of perspectives on the early years of the English healthcare safety investigation branch. What can the era of big data and big data analytics mean for health services research? Collaborative and integrated working between general practice and community pharmacies: A realist review of what works, for whom, and in which contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1