The 22 September 1979 Vela Incident: The Detected Double-Flash

IF 0.7 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Science & Global Security Pub Date : 2017-09-02 DOI:10.1080/08929882.2017.1394047
C. Wright, L. De Geer
{"title":"The 22 September 1979 Vela Incident: The Detected Double-Flash","authors":"C. Wright, L. De Geer","doi":"10.1080/08929882.2017.1394047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT On 22 September 1979 two optical sensors on U.S. satellite Vela 6911 detected a double-flash of light that appeared characteristic of an atmospheric nuclear explosion conducted over the southern Atlantic or Indian Ocean. It became known as the Vela Incident, Event 747, or Alert 747. An anomaly between the amplitude of the two signals during the second pulse led a U.S. government expert panel established to assess the event to conclude in mid-1980 that a more likely explanation was the impact of a small meteoroid on the satellite, the debris from which reflected sunlight into the sensors' field of view. No model was presented to support the contention, and a similar anomaly—known as background modulation—was a given for the second pulse of all confirmed explosions detected by Vela, though beginning later. Nonetheless, this event has remained the subject of intense debate. This article reviews the evidence and presents an updated analysis of the original Vela signal based on recently declassified literature and on modern knowledge of interplanetary dust and hyper velocity impact. Given the geometry of the satellite, and that the bulk of the surface comprised solar panels, much of the debris from any collision would be carried away from the sensors' field of view. Thus, a meteoroid collision appears much less likely than previously assumed. The double flash is instead consistent with a nuclear explosion, albeit detected by an aged satellite for which background modulation was abnormal and/or commenced earlier, also seen in post-event SYSTEM tests. A companion paper to be published in 2018 presents radionuclide and hydroacoustic evidence supporting the conclusion that the Vela Incident was a nuclear weapon test explosion.","PeriodicalId":55952,"journal":{"name":"Science & Global Security","volume":"43 1","pages":"124 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Global Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2017.1394047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT On 22 September 1979 two optical sensors on U.S. satellite Vela 6911 detected a double-flash of light that appeared characteristic of an atmospheric nuclear explosion conducted over the southern Atlantic or Indian Ocean. It became known as the Vela Incident, Event 747, or Alert 747. An anomaly between the amplitude of the two signals during the second pulse led a U.S. government expert panel established to assess the event to conclude in mid-1980 that a more likely explanation was the impact of a small meteoroid on the satellite, the debris from which reflected sunlight into the sensors' field of view. No model was presented to support the contention, and a similar anomaly—known as background modulation—was a given for the second pulse of all confirmed explosions detected by Vela, though beginning later. Nonetheless, this event has remained the subject of intense debate. This article reviews the evidence and presents an updated analysis of the original Vela signal based on recently declassified literature and on modern knowledge of interplanetary dust and hyper velocity impact. Given the geometry of the satellite, and that the bulk of the surface comprised solar panels, much of the debris from any collision would be carried away from the sensors' field of view. Thus, a meteoroid collision appears much less likely than previously assumed. The double flash is instead consistent with a nuclear explosion, albeit detected by an aged satellite for which background modulation was abnormal and/or commenced earlier, also seen in post-event SYSTEM tests. A companion paper to be published in 2018 presents radionuclide and hydroacoustic evidence supporting the conclusion that the Vela Incident was a nuclear weapon test explosion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1979年9月22日船帆事件:侦测到的双重闪光
1979年9月22日,美国Vela 6911卫星上的两个光学传感器探测到在南大西洋或印度洋上空进行的大气核爆炸的双重闪光。它后来被称为船帆事件、747事件或747警报。在第二次脉冲中,两个信号的振幅异常,导致美国政府专家小组在1980年中期成立了一个评估该事件的小组,得出结论认为,一个更可能的解释是一个小流星体对卫星的影响,碎片将阳光反射到传感器的视野中。没有模型被提出来支持这一论点,并且一个类似的异常——被称为背景调制——被认为是船帆座探测到的所有确认爆炸的第二脉冲,尽管开始的时间较晚。尽管如此,这一事件仍然是激烈辩论的主题。本文回顾了这些证据,并根据最近解密的文献和关于行星际尘埃和超高速撞击的现代知识,提出了对船帆座原始信号的最新分析。考虑到卫星的几何形状,以及大部分表面由太阳能电池板组成,任何碰撞产生的大部分碎片都将被带离传感器的视野。因此,流星体碰撞的可能性似乎比先前假设的要小得多。相反,双闪与核爆炸相一致,尽管被一颗老化的卫星探测到,该卫星的背景调制异常和/或开始较早,也在事后系统测试中看到。将于2018年发表的一篇配套论文提出了放射性核素和水声证据,支持船帆事件是一次核武器试验爆炸的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Global Security
Science & Global Security INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Utilizing a Virtual Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Digital Twin to Aid in Diversion Pathway Analysis for International Safeguards Applications Editors’ Note Plutonium Production under Uranium Constraint Hypersonic Weapons: Vulnerability to Missile Defenses and Comparison to MaRVs Ceci N’est Pas Une Bombe: Lessons from a Field Experiment Using Neutron and Gamma Measurements to Confirm the Absence of Nuclear Weapons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1