Using a Structural Equation Model to Evaluate the Roles of Traditional Institutions in Rural Agriculture Success and Sustainability

W. Ndlovu, M. Mwale, J. Zuwarimwe
{"title":"Using a Structural Equation Model to Evaluate the Roles of Traditional Institutions in Rural Agriculture Success and Sustainability","authors":"W. Ndlovu, M. Mwale, J. Zuwarimwe","doi":"10.55493/5005.v12i4.4675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrating and facilitating effective participation of the Traditional Leadership Institution (TLI) in rural development remains a challenge to date. It remains unclear what the agriculture sector-specific institutional roles are and how they impact the success and sustainability of agriculture. Furthermore, the barriers to institutional effectiveness remain unknown. A structural equation model was used to evaluate the moderating effect of barriers to institutional effectiveness on the relationship between TLI roles and agriculture success and sustainability. ATLAS.ti version 8 and Statistical Package for Social Sciences Amos version 26 were used for the analysis. In the first part of the study, participants’ views on the three variables were explored through focus groups and interviews (N = 103). Next, construct measures for each scenario were modeled in a self-administered survey questionnaire (N = 211). Farmers, traditional leaders, and key informants in the Vhembe and Mopani districts of Limpopo province, South Africa, provided data for the study. It emerged that of the five identified TLI roles, four had a significant impact on the success and sustainability of agriculture projects. Promoting social capital (networks, partnerships, and collaborations) among farmers and development actors had the greatest effect. The barriers to institutional effectiveness were significant and moderated how the TLI influenced rural agriculture success. Resultantly, the impact of institutional contributions on agriculture remained negative despite improved participation by the TLI. Minimizing the effects of the identified barriers while enhancing the institutional capacity to promote the success and sustainability of rural agriculture is recommended.","PeriodicalId":36876,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55493/5005.v12i4.4675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating and facilitating effective participation of the Traditional Leadership Institution (TLI) in rural development remains a challenge to date. It remains unclear what the agriculture sector-specific institutional roles are and how they impact the success and sustainability of agriculture. Furthermore, the barriers to institutional effectiveness remain unknown. A structural equation model was used to evaluate the moderating effect of barriers to institutional effectiveness on the relationship between TLI roles and agriculture success and sustainability. ATLAS.ti version 8 and Statistical Package for Social Sciences Amos version 26 were used for the analysis. In the first part of the study, participants’ views on the three variables were explored through focus groups and interviews (N = 103). Next, construct measures for each scenario were modeled in a self-administered survey questionnaire (N = 211). Farmers, traditional leaders, and key informants in the Vhembe and Mopani districts of Limpopo province, South Africa, provided data for the study. It emerged that of the five identified TLI roles, four had a significant impact on the success and sustainability of agriculture projects. Promoting social capital (networks, partnerships, and collaborations) among farmers and development actors had the greatest effect. The barriers to institutional effectiveness were significant and moderated how the TLI influenced rural agriculture success. Resultantly, the impact of institutional contributions on agriculture remained negative despite improved participation by the TLI. Minimizing the effects of the identified barriers while enhancing the institutional capacity to promote the success and sustainability of rural agriculture is recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用结构方程模型评价传统制度在农村农业成功与可持续发展中的作用
整合和促进传统领导机构有效参与农村发展至今仍然是一项挑战。目前尚不清楚具体农业部门的机构作用是什么,以及它们如何影响农业的成功和可持续性。此外,阻碍体制效能的障碍仍然未知。采用结构方程模型评估了制度有效性障碍对TLI角色与农业成功和可持续性关系的调节作用。阿特拉斯。使用ti version 8和Statistical Package for Social Sciences Amos version 26进行分析。在研究的第一部分中,通过焦点小组和访谈(N = 103)来探讨参与者对这三个变量的看法。接下来,在自我管理的调查问卷(N = 211)中对每个场景的构建措施进行建模。南非林波波省Vhembe和Mopani地区的农民、传统领袖和关键线人为这项研究提供了数据。结果表明,在确定的五个TLI角色中,有四个对农业项目的成功和可持续性有重大影响。促进农民和发展行动者之间的社会资本(网络、伙伴关系和合作)的效果最大。制度有效性的障碍是显著的,并且调节了TLI对农村农业成功的影响。结果,尽管TLI的参与有所改善,但机构贡献对农业的影响仍然是消极的。建议尽量减少已查明的障碍的影响,同时加强促进农村农业成功和可持续性的体制能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development
Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Mitigating the impact of mercury on rural people by providing scenarios on alternative income through corn farming improvement Estimating cost efficiency and sources of inefficiency in paddy farming: A study in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta Analysis of producer behavior towards organic vegetables in Vientiane capital, Lao PDR An analysis of environmental and economic impacts of the system of rice intensification : A case study in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam Application of trichoderma and aspergillus as biofertilizers in eco-friendly ratoon rice cultivation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1