Implications of a Trilateral FTA between China, Japan and Korea for Australian Bilateral FTAs with China, Japan and Korea

IF 0.3 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Australasian Agribusiness Review Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.22004/AG.ECON.206168
Wei Si, Jooho Song, B. Malcolm, Zhang-yue Zhou
{"title":"Implications of a Trilateral FTA between China, Japan and Korea for Australian Bilateral FTAs with China, Japan and Korea","authors":"Wei Si, Jooho Song, B. Malcolm, Zhang-yue Zhou","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.206168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After many years and many rounds of negotiations seeking bilateral free trade agreements (FTA) between Australia and China, Japan and Korea, progress has been minimal because they cannot agree on access to markets for agricultural products. To add to the complications and lack of progress made in these negotiations, China, Japan and Korea have started negotiating a trilateral FTA. If a China-Japan-Korea Trilateral FTA is struck, it could affect Australian negotiation of bilateral FTAs with each of these countries, with consequential implications for Australian agricultural exports. These concerns are the main focus of this paper. However when the comparative advantages of agricultural production and agricultural trade complementarities of these countries are examined, it seems that if a China-Japan-Korea trilateral FTA is struck, it ought to not further complicate Australia’s bilateral FTA negotiations. A trilateral FTA between China, Japan and Korea would have limited negative impacts on Australia’s agricultural exports to these countries. Australia has a strong comparative advantage in producing many land-intensive products that these three countries will continue to need to import. Nonetheless, successfully concluding bilateral FTAs with each of China, Japan and Korea remains a formidable challenge because agreement on agricultural trade negotiations remains elusive. In future, Australia’s FTA negotiators may need to be even more pragmatic, strategic and flexible in their approach to agricultural trade negotiations.","PeriodicalId":41561,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Agribusiness Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Agribusiness Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.206168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

After many years and many rounds of negotiations seeking bilateral free trade agreements (FTA) between Australia and China, Japan and Korea, progress has been minimal because they cannot agree on access to markets for agricultural products. To add to the complications and lack of progress made in these negotiations, China, Japan and Korea have started negotiating a trilateral FTA. If a China-Japan-Korea Trilateral FTA is struck, it could affect Australian negotiation of bilateral FTAs with each of these countries, with consequential implications for Australian agricultural exports. These concerns are the main focus of this paper. However when the comparative advantages of agricultural production and agricultural trade complementarities of these countries are examined, it seems that if a China-Japan-Korea trilateral FTA is struck, it ought to not further complicate Australia’s bilateral FTA negotiations. A trilateral FTA between China, Japan and Korea would have limited negative impacts on Australia’s agricultural exports to these countries. Australia has a strong comparative advantage in producing many land-intensive products that these three countries will continue to need to import. Nonetheless, successfully concluding bilateral FTAs with each of China, Japan and Korea remains a formidable challenge because agreement on agricultural trade negotiations remains elusive. In future, Australia’s FTA negotiators may need to be even more pragmatic, strategic and flexible in their approach to agricultural trade negotiations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中日韩三国自由贸易协定对澳大利亚中日韩双边自由贸易协定的影响
在寻求澳大利亚与中国、日本和韩国之间的双边自由贸易协定(FTA)的多年和多轮谈判之后,进展甚微,因为他们无法就农产品的市场准入达成一致。使这些谈判更加复杂和缺乏进展的是,中国、日本和韩国已经开始谈判中日韩自由贸易协定。如果中日韩三边自由贸易协定达成,可能会影响澳大利亚与这些国家的双边自由贸易协定谈判,对澳大利亚农产品出口产生相应影响。这些问题是本文的主要关注点。然而,从两国农业生产的比较优势和农业贸易的互补性来看,如果中日韩三国达成自贸协定,似乎不应使澳大利亚双边自贸协定谈判进一步复杂化。中国、日本和韩国之间的三边自由贸易协定将对澳大利亚对这些国家的农产品出口产生有限的负面影响。澳大利亚在生产许多土地密集型产品方面具有很强的比较优势,这三个国家将继续需要进口这些产品。尽管如此,成功地与中国、日本和韩国达成双边自由贸易协定仍然是一项艰巨的挑战,因为农业贸易谈判的协议仍然难以达成。未来,澳大利亚自由贸易协定的谈判代表在农业贸易谈判中可能需要更加务实、更具战略性和灵活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Agribusiness Review
Australasian Agribusiness Review AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring the Returns to Investment in RD&E in the WA Grains Industry Using Equilibrium Displacement Modelling Financing Agricultural Value Chain RDE: An Alternative Approach with Examples from the Red Meat Industry Updating and Recalibrating Equilibrium Displacement Models of the Australian Livestock Industries: Beef Taking Stock: Identifying the Growing Agricultural Service Sector in Australia Specifying and Testing an Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Coconut Market in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1