Effect of first‑month specific therapy determines long‑term clinical outcome in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (RCD code: II‑1A.4.o)

A. Nowak, Karolina Bula, Karol Głowacki, Wojciech Gawin, Marcin Kalita, Konstantinos Nechoritis, M. Grabka, K. Mizia-Stec
{"title":"Effect of first‑month specific therapy determines long‑term clinical outcome in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (RCD code: II‑1A.4.o)","authors":"A. Nowak, Karolina Bula, Karol Głowacki, Wojciech Gawin, Marcin Kalita, Konstantinos Nechoritis, M. Grabka, K. Mizia-Stec","doi":"10.20418/JRCD.VOL3NO6.316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Efficacy of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-specific therapy may differ among the patients depending on the PAH aetiology. Aim: To compare the real‑life efficacy of PAH‑specific therapy between non‑congenital heart disease (non‑CHD) and CHD groups of PAH patients and to determine whether an early clinical response has an impact on prognosis. Methods: Clinical data from 41 PAH patients, 21 non‑CHD and 20 CHD patients, were included in the study. The WHO functional class (WHO‑FC), 6‑minute walk distance (6MWD) and NT‑proBNP serum level were compared at baseline and after 1 and 7 months of PAH‑specific treatment. Only patients with unmodified PAH‑specific therapy during 7‑month follow‑up were enrolled in the study. Results: Baseline characteristics revealed higher WHO‑FC and increased [loge]NT‑proBNP levels (7.74 ±1.05 vs 6.51 ±1.48; p = 0.008) in non‑CHD vs. CHD patients; baseline 6MWD was similar in both groups (283.3 ±148.5 m vs 339.2 ±114.7 m). Clinical improvement by at least one WHO‑FC after 1‑month treatment was observed more frequently in non‑CHD (55%) when compared with CHD patients (25%, p = 0.04) and was comparable (50% vs 50%) after 7‑month observation. Non‑CHD patients, who did not improve within 1 month of treatment were unlikely to achieve improvement after 7 months. The 6MWD increased during the first month of treatment in non‑CHD (p=0.009) and in CHD patients (p=0.006) when compared to baseline values and remained at this level after 7 months of treatment. [Loge]NT‑proBNP levels markedly declined only in non‑CHD patients, who had an improvement in WHO‑FC (8.0 ±1.0 vs 7.4±1.1, p=0.04) in the first month. In CHD patients, the decrease in [loge]NT‑proBNP level was seen (6.5 ± 1.5 vs 6.1 ±1.5, p=0.04) only within a 1‑month observation. Conclusion: Efficacy of 1‑month PAH‑specific therapy is aetiology‑dependent and determines clinical outcome in patients with PAH. JRCD 2018; 3 (6): 199–204","PeriodicalId":37488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rare Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"86 1","pages":"198-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rare Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20418/JRCD.VOL3NO6.316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Efficacy of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-specific therapy may differ among the patients depending on the PAH aetiology. Aim: To compare the real‑life efficacy of PAH‑specific therapy between non‑congenital heart disease (non‑CHD) and CHD groups of PAH patients and to determine whether an early clinical response has an impact on prognosis. Methods: Clinical data from 41 PAH patients, 21 non‑CHD and 20 CHD patients, were included in the study. The WHO functional class (WHO‑FC), 6‑minute walk distance (6MWD) and NT‑proBNP serum level were compared at baseline and after 1 and 7 months of PAH‑specific treatment. Only patients with unmodified PAH‑specific therapy during 7‑month follow‑up were enrolled in the study. Results: Baseline characteristics revealed higher WHO‑FC and increased [loge]NT‑proBNP levels (7.74 ±1.05 vs 6.51 ±1.48; p = 0.008) in non‑CHD vs. CHD patients; baseline 6MWD was similar in both groups (283.3 ±148.5 m vs 339.2 ±114.7 m). Clinical improvement by at least one WHO‑FC after 1‑month treatment was observed more frequently in non‑CHD (55%) when compared with CHD patients (25%, p = 0.04) and was comparable (50% vs 50%) after 7‑month observation. Non‑CHD patients, who did not improve within 1 month of treatment were unlikely to achieve improvement after 7 months. The 6MWD increased during the first month of treatment in non‑CHD (p=0.009) and in CHD patients (p=0.006) when compared to baseline values and remained at this level after 7 months of treatment. [Loge]NT‑proBNP levels markedly declined only in non‑CHD patients, who had an improvement in WHO‑FC (8.0 ±1.0 vs 7.4±1.1, p=0.04) in the first month. In CHD patients, the decrease in [loge]NT‑proBNP level was seen (6.5 ± 1.5 vs 6.1 ±1.5, p=0.04) only within a 1‑month observation. Conclusion: Efficacy of 1‑month PAH‑specific therapy is aetiology‑dependent and determines clinical outcome in patients with PAH. JRCD 2018; 3 (6): 199–204
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首个月特异性治疗的效果决定肺动脉高压患者的长期临床预后(RCD代码:II - 1A.4.o)
背景:肺动脉高压(PAH)特异性治疗的疗效可能因PAH病因而异。目的:比较PAH特异性治疗在非先天性心脏病(非冠心病)和冠心病组PAH患者的实际疗效,并确定早期临床反应是否对预后有影响。方法:41例PAH患者、21例非冠心病患者和20例冠心病患者的临床资料纳入研究。在基线和PAH特异性治疗1个月和7个月后比较WHO功能分级(WHO - FC)、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)和NT - proBNP血清水平。只有在7个月的随访期间接受未经改良的PAH特异性治疗的患者被纳入研究。结果:基线特征显示更高的WHO - FC和更高的[loge]NT - proBNP水平(7.74±1.05 vs 6.51±1.48;p = 0.008);两组的基线6MWD相似(283.3±148.5 m vs 339.2±114.7 m)。治疗1个月后,至少有一项WHO - FC的临床改善在非冠心病患者中更为常见(55%,p = 0.04),而在7个月后的观察中也相当(50% vs 50%)。非冠心病患者在治疗1个月内没有改善,不太可能在7个月后达到改善。与基线值相比,非冠心病患者(p=0.009)和冠心病患者(p=0.006)在治疗的第一个月内6MWD增加,并在治疗7个月后保持在该水平。[Loge]NT - proBNP水平仅在非冠心病患者中显著下降,在第一个月who - FC有改善(8.0±1.0 vs 7.4±1.1,p=0.04)。在冠心病患者中,仅在1个月内观察到NT - proBNP水平的下降(6.5±1.5 vs 6.1±1.5,p=0.04)。结论:1个月PAH特异性治疗的疗效与病因有关,并决定PAH患者的临床预后。JRCD 2018;3 (6): 199-204
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rare Cardiovascular Diseases
Journal of Rare Cardiovascular Diseases Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rare Cardiovascular Diseases (JRCD) is an international, quarterly issued, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that keeps cardiologists and non-cardiologists up-to-date with rare disorders of the heart and vessels. The Journal publishes fine quality review articles, original, basic and clinical sciences research papers, either positive or negative, case reports and articles on public health issues in the field of rare cardiovascular diseases and orphan cardiovascular drugs. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to the following areas: (1) rare diseases of systemic circulation (2) rare diseases of pulmonary circulation (3) rare diseases of the heart (cardiomyopathies) (4) rare congenital cardiovascular diseases (5) rare arrhythmogenic disorders (6) cardiac tumors and cardiovascular diseases in malignancy (7) cardiovascular diseases in pregnancy (8) basic science (9) quality of life
期刊最新文献
Association of fibrinogen and D‑dimer levels with severity of acute coronary syndromes Journal of Rare Cardiovascular Diseases in EuroPub database An Extremely Rare Congenital Association: Uni- cuspid Aortic Valve with Left Ventricular Noncom- paction (RCD code: III-5A.1.o) Survival analysis of time to develop cardiovascular complications and its predictors among hypertensive patients treated in the Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study (RCD code: VIII) Autoimmune hepatitis induced by bosentan in a patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension (RCD code: II‐1A.1; VIII)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1