Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: When is it Safe to Drive After Total Ankle Arthroplasty?

S. Leopold
{"title":"Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: When is it Safe to Drive After Total Ankle Arthroplasty?","authors":"S. Leopold","doi":"10.1097/corr.0000000000001069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When we talk about driving after orthopaedic surgery, the conversation really has two parts: When do patients return to driving, and when should they? One recent, high-quality survey study [13] suggests that a high proportion of patients returned to driving after major lower-extremity reconstructions within a couple weeks of surgery and another systematic review [3] found that some resumed driving within days. I’m going to try to keep a neutral tone and say this as scientifically as I can: That’s nuts. We know that most patients who were opioid-naı̈ve prior to undergoing THA and TKA are still using narcotic analgesics a month after surgery (and the proportion is higher among those who took opioids before surgery) [4], and that opioid use is associated with an increased risk of fatal motor-vehicle accidents [7] as well as with increased culpability in such crashes [1]. And, of course, being off of narcotics is just one element of driving readiness; medical impairment (as is present in the weeks following surgery) [15], and things like brake-response time and brake pressure—which may not normalize for amonth or longer aftermajor surgery [3]—are some of the many others. While the senior author of that last study expressed in an interview that the patient is responsible to decide when to resume driving [5], others suggest that relying on patients’ judgment is neither scientific nor prudent [14], as human psychology suggests that they are likely to overestimate their abilities and underestimate the risks [6]. This matters to surgeons mainly because we care about the health and well-being of our patients. But I hasten to add that it also matters to us because physicians are considered “mandatory reporters” in some states (that is, we are responsible to report patients to the state if we believe their level of impairment meets the state’s threshold) [11], and because patients have successfully sued their physicians for car accidents that occur after surgery [2]. With this as background, I’m excited to present some of the highest-quality experimental evidence I’ve read on this topic in this month’s Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research [9]. A team lead by Steven M. Raikin MD, from the Rothman Institute in Philadelphia, PA, USA, found that nearly 10% of patients did not pass a brakereaction time test 6 weeks after undergoing right-sided total ankle arthroplasty, tending to reinforce the concern that patients who drive within a few weeks of major lower-limb surgery really are taking a big risk. Since surgeons are not going to give a driving test, Dr. Raikin’s team also found some easy-toidentify parameters that were associated with failing the test they administered: More pain (and even a little bit counts: those who passed had a median VAS score of 1 out of 10, while those who failed had a median of 3), and greater joint stiffness. A note from the Editor-In-Chief: In “Editor’s Spotlight,” one of our editors provides brief commentary on a paper we believe is especially important and worthy of general interest. Following the explanation of our choice, we present “Take 5,” in which the editor goes behind the discovery with a one-on-one interview with an author of the article featured in “Editor’s Spotlight.”We welcome reader feedback on all of our columns and articles; please send your comments to eic@clinorthop.org. The author certifies that neither he, nor any members of his immediate family, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connectionwith the submitted article. The opinions expressed are those of the writer, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. This comment refers to the article available at: DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000881. S. S. Leopold MD (✉), Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1600 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19013 USA, Email: sleopold@clinorthop.org","PeriodicalId":10465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000001069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

When we talk about driving after orthopaedic surgery, the conversation really has two parts: When do patients return to driving, and when should they? One recent, high-quality survey study [13] suggests that a high proportion of patients returned to driving after major lower-extremity reconstructions within a couple weeks of surgery and another systematic review [3] found that some resumed driving within days. I’m going to try to keep a neutral tone and say this as scientifically as I can: That’s nuts. We know that most patients who were opioid-naı̈ve prior to undergoing THA and TKA are still using narcotic analgesics a month after surgery (and the proportion is higher among those who took opioids before surgery) [4], and that opioid use is associated with an increased risk of fatal motor-vehicle accidents [7] as well as with increased culpability in such crashes [1]. And, of course, being off of narcotics is just one element of driving readiness; medical impairment (as is present in the weeks following surgery) [15], and things like brake-response time and brake pressure—which may not normalize for amonth or longer aftermajor surgery [3]—are some of the many others. While the senior author of that last study expressed in an interview that the patient is responsible to decide when to resume driving [5], others suggest that relying on patients’ judgment is neither scientific nor prudent [14], as human psychology suggests that they are likely to overestimate their abilities and underestimate the risks [6]. This matters to surgeons mainly because we care about the health and well-being of our patients. But I hasten to add that it also matters to us because physicians are considered “mandatory reporters” in some states (that is, we are responsible to report patients to the state if we believe their level of impairment meets the state’s threshold) [11], and because patients have successfully sued their physicians for car accidents that occur after surgery [2]. With this as background, I’m excited to present some of the highest-quality experimental evidence I’ve read on this topic in this month’s Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research [9]. A team lead by Steven M. Raikin MD, from the Rothman Institute in Philadelphia, PA, USA, found that nearly 10% of patients did not pass a brakereaction time test 6 weeks after undergoing right-sided total ankle arthroplasty, tending to reinforce the concern that patients who drive within a few weeks of major lower-limb surgery really are taking a big risk. Since surgeons are not going to give a driving test, Dr. Raikin’s team also found some easy-toidentify parameters that were associated with failing the test they administered: More pain (and even a little bit counts: those who passed had a median VAS score of 1 out of 10, while those who failed had a median of 3), and greater joint stiffness. A note from the Editor-In-Chief: In “Editor’s Spotlight,” one of our editors provides brief commentary on a paper we believe is especially important and worthy of general interest. Following the explanation of our choice, we present “Take 5,” in which the editor goes behind the discovery with a one-on-one interview with an author of the article featured in “Editor’s Spotlight.”We welcome reader feedback on all of our columns and articles; please send your comments to eic@clinorthop.org. The author certifies that neither he, nor any members of his immediate family, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connectionwith the submitted article. The opinions expressed are those of the writer, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. This comment refers to the article available at: DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000881. S. S. Leopold MD (✉), Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1600 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19013 USA, Email: sleopold@clinorthop.org
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编辑聚焦/专题五:全踝关节置换术后何时驾车安全?
当我们谈论骨科手术后的驾驶时,谈话实际上有两个部分:病人什么时候恢复驾驶,什么时候应该恢复驾驶?最近一项高质量的调查研究[13]表明,很大比例的患者在下肢重建术后几周内恢复驾驶,另一项系统综述[3]发现一些患者在几天内恢复驾驶。我将尽量保持中立的语气,尽可能科学地说:这太疯狂了。我们知道,大多数在接受THA和TKA之前是阿片类药物的患者在手术后一个月仍在使用麻醉性镇痛药(在术前服用阿片类药物的患者中这一比例更高)[4],阿片类药物的使用与致命机动车事故的风险增加有关[7],并增加了此类事故的罪责[1]。当然,戒掉毒品只是促使人们做好准备的一个因素;医学损伤(如在手术后的几周内出现)[15],以及像制动反应时间和制动压力这样的东西——在大手术后的一个月或更长时间内可能无法恢复正常[3]——是许多其他因素中的一部分。虽然最后一项研究的资深作者在接受采访时表示,患者有责任决定何时恢复驾驶[5],但也有人认为,依靠患者的判断既不科学也不谨慎[14],因为人类心理学表明,他们可能会高估自己的能力,低估风险[6]。这对外科医生来说很重要,主要是因为我们关心病人的健康和幸福。但我要赶紧补充一点,这对我们也很重要,因为在一些州,医生被认为是“强制性报告者”(也就是说,如果我们认为病人的损伤程度达到了州的阈值,我们有责任向州报告病人)[11],而且因为病人已经成功地就手术后发生的车祸起诉了他们的医生[2]。在此背景下,我很高兴在本月的《临床骨科及相关研究》(Clinical orthopopatics and Related Research)上发表我所读到的关于这一主题的一些最高质量的实验证据[9]。来自美国宾夕法尼亚州费城罗斯曼研究所的Steven M. Raikin医学博士领导的一个研究小组发现,近10%的患者在接受右侧全踝关节置换术6周后没有通过制动时间测试,这加强了人们的担忧,即在重大下肢手术后几周内开车的患者确实冒着很大的风险。由于外科医生不会进行驾驶测试,雷金博士的团队还发现了一些容易识别的参数,这些参数与他们进行的测试失败有关:更痛(即使是一点点也很重要:通过的人的VAS评分中值为1分(满分10分),而不及格的人的VAS评分中值为3分),关节僵硬程度更高。总编辑的注释:在“编辑聚焦”中,我们的一位编辑对一篇我们认为特别重要且值得普遍关注的论文提供了简短的评论。在解释了我们的选择之后,我们将呈现“第5条”,在这条视频中,编辑将通过对“编辑聚焦”中这篇文章的作者的一对一采访,深入了解这一发现的背后。我们欢迎读者对我们所有的专栏和文章进行反馈;请将您的意见发送到eic@clinorthop.org。作者证明,他本人及其直系亲属均无任何可能与所提交文章产生利益冲突的商业协会(如咨询公司、股权、股权、专利/许可安排等)。所表达的观点是作者的观点,不反映CORR或骨关节外科医生协会的观点或政策。此评论引用的文章可在:DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000881。S. S. Leopold MD(;),临床骨科及相关研究,1600 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19013 USA, Email: sleopold@clinorthop.org
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CORR Insights®: What is the Geographic Distribution of Women Orthopaedic Surgeons Throughout the United States? What Are the Rates and Trends of Women Authors in Three High-Impact Orthopaedic Journals from 2006-2017? CORR Insights®: Chair Versus Chairman: Does Orthopaedics Use the Gendered Term More Than Other Specialties? CORR Insights®: Does the Proportion of Women in Orthopaedic Leadership Roles Reflect the Gender Composition of Specialty Societies? Women Are at Higher Risk for Concussions Due to Ball or Equipment Contact in Soccer and Lacrosse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1