Cost-effectiveness of using chatbots in healthcare: a systematic review

M. Fgaier, Z. Zrubka
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of using chatbots in healthcare: a systematic review","authors":"M. Fgaier, Z. Zrubka","doi":"10.1109/CINTI-MACRo57952.2022.10029478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chatbots are automated conversation agents which are initiated through text and/ or voice messages using smartphones, computers, or other connected devices. The implementation of chatbot technology in healthcare has been growing during the recent years and chatbots are increasingly used in diagnostic tools or for patient management. Through the years, a moderate amount and mixed quality evidence has been generated on the efficacy and safety of healthcare chatbots, and despite their cost-saving potential, research on their cost-effectiveness has been scarce. The aim of this paper is to systematically review the methods and results of cost-effectiveness studies involving healthcare chatbots. Literature search was executed via PubMed and Web of Science. Two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. A descriptive summary was performed. The reporting quality of both studies was poor. Both studies indicated that their cost-effectiveness measurements were study-based but only one study reported actuals costs. Cost effectiveness referred to resource savings on healthcare processes, but patients’ health outcomes were not measured, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were not reported. Therefore, the cost-effectiveness of healthcare chatbots should be further assessed by formal health economic evaluations.","PeriodicalId":18535,"journal":{"name":"Micro","volume":"2013 1","pages":"000305-000310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Micro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CINTI-MACRo57952.2022.10029478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chatbots are automated conversation agents which are initiated through text and/ or voice messages using smartphones, computers, or other connected devices. The implementation of chatbot technology in healthcare has been growing during the recent years and chatbots are increasingly used in diagnostic tools or for patient management. Through the years, a moderate amount and mixed quality evidence has been generated on the efficacy and safety of healthcare chatbots, and despite their cost-saving potential, research on their cost-effectiveness has been scarce. The aim of this paper is to systematically review the methods and results of cost-effectiveness studies involving healthcare chatbots. Literature search was executed via PubMed and Web of Science. Two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. A descriptive summary was performed. The reporting quality of both studies was poor. Both studies indicated that their cost-effectiveness measurements were study-based but only one study reported actuals costs. Cost effectiveness referred to resource savings on healthcare processes, but patients’ health outcomes were not measured, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were not reported. Therefore, the cost-effectiveness of healthcare chatbots should be further assessed by formal health economic evaluations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医疗保健中使用聊天机器人的成本效益:一项系统综述
聊天机器人是通过智能手机、电脑或其他连接设备通过文本和/或语音信息发起的自动对话代理。近年来,聊天机器人技术在医疗保健领域的应用一直在增长,聊天机器人越来越多地用于诊断工具或患者管理。多年来,关于医疗聊天机器人的有效性和安全性的证据数量适中,质量参差不齐,尽管它们具有节省成本的潜力,但对其成本效益的研究却很少。本文的目的是系统地回顾涉及医疗聊天机器人的成本效益研究的方法和结果。文献检索通过PubMed和Web of Science进行。两项研究符合纳入标准,被纳入本系统综述。进行了描述性总结。两项研究的报告质量都很差。两项研究都表明,它们的成本效益衡量是以研究为基础的,但只有一项研究报告了实际成本。成本效益指的是医疗保健过程中的资源节约,但没有衡量患者的健康结果,也没有报告增量成本效益比。因此,医疗聊天机器人的成本效益应该通过正式的卫生经济评估来进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Microstructure Patterns: Influence on Hydrophobic Properties of 3D-Printed Surfaces Optical and Morphological Characterization of Nanoscale Oxides Grown in Low-Energy H+-Implanted c-Silicon Extending Polymer Opal Structural Color Properties into the Near-Infrared Implementation of Numerical Model for Prediction of Temperature Distribution for Metallic-Coated Firefighter Protective Clothing A Microfluidic Paper-Based Lateral Flow Device for Quantitative ELISA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1