Supplemental Material for Preschooler Stressor-Related Thoughts and Worries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development and Validation of a Caregiver-Report Instrument

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Traumatology Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.1037/trm0000429.supp
M. Vasileva, M. Marsac, E. Alisic, V. Cobham, Seethalakshmi Davis, C. Donovan, A. Hildenbrand, Elisabeth Hoehn, Sonja March, Alisa B Miller, T. Smith-Thomas, Rachel Wamser-Nanney, A. D. De Young
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Preschooler Stressor-Related Thoughts and Worries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development and Validation of a Caregiver-Report Instrument","authors":"M. Vasileva, M. Marsac, E. Alisic, V. Cobham, Seethalakshmi Davis, C. Donovan, A. Hildenbrand, Elisabeth Hoehn, Sonja March, Alisa B Miller, T. Smith-Thomas, Rachel Wamser-Nanney, A. D. De Young","doi":"10.1037/trm0000429.supp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is little evidence on cognitions that are associated with emotional and behavioral problems in preschoolers during stressful events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This article presents the initial development and validation of a caregiver-report instrument, the Preschooler Stressor-related Thoughts and Worries (PSTW) scale, developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020, caregivers from two countries reported on their child's cognitions at baseline (T0) and three months later (T1;age 3-5 years;Australia: N = 559;United States: N = 346). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted with the Australian sample at T0 and confirmed with the U.S. sample at T0. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a one-factor model including 10 items. Results of the confirmatory factor analysis failed to clearly support this structure (comparative fit index = .91, root mean square error of approximation = .11). Construct validity was supported by positive associations between PSTW scores and emotional and behavioral problems. Although the PSTW is a promising instrument to assess preschooler cognitions related to COVID-19, further investigation of its performance in other contexts (e.g., other countries, other stressful or traumatic events) is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":53710,"journal":{"name":"Traumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000429.supp","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is little evidence on cognitions that are associated with emotional and behavioral problems in preschoolers during stressful events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This article presents the initial development and validation of a caregiver-report instrument, the Preschooler Stressor-related Thoughts and Worries (PSTW) scale, developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020, caregivers from two countries reported on their child's cognitions at baseline (T0) and three months later (T1;age 3-5 years;Australia: N = 559;United States: N = 346). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted with the Australian sample at T0 and confirmed with the U.S. sample at T0. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a one-factor model including 10 items. Results of the confirmatory factor analysis failed to clearly support this structure (comparative fit index = .91, root mean square error of approximation = .11). Construct validity was supported by positive associations between PSTW scores and emotional and behavioral problems. Although the PSTW is a promising instrument to assess preschooler cognitions related to COVID-19, further investigation of its performance in other contexts (e.g., other countries, other stressful or traumatic events) is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间学龄前儿童压力相关想法和担忧的补充材料:护理人员报告工具的开发和验证
几乎没有证据表明,在COVID-19大流行等压力事件中,学龄前儿童的认知与情绪和行为问题有关。本文介绍了在COVID-19大流行期间开发的照顾者报告工具-学龄前儿童压力相关思想和担忧(PSTW)量表的初步开发和验证。2020年,来自两个国家的护理人员报告了他们的孩子在基线(0岁)和3个月后(1岁;3-5岁;澳大利亚:N = 559;美国:N = 346)的认知。探索性因子分析(EFA)在T0时对澳大利亚样本进行,并在T0时对美国样本进行确认。探索性因子分析建议采用包含10个项目的单因素模型。验证性因子分析结果未能明确支持这一结构(比较拟合指数= 0.91,近似均方根误差= 0.11)。建构效度在PSTW得分与情绪和行为问题之间存在正相关。虽然PSTW是评估与COVID-19相关的学龄前儿童认知的一种很有前景的工具,但需要进一步调查其在其他情况下(例如,其他国家、其他压力或创伤事件)的表现。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2022 APA,版权所有)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Traumatology
Traumatology Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The purpose of this peer-reviewed Journal is to disseminate new and original contributions to the traumatology field as quickly as possible to subscribers after they emerge from the field. This requires a dedicated Editorial Board, ad hoc reviewers, and contributors who are willing to contribute their time without charge. Contributions focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention, education, training, medical, and legal and policy concerns. The Journal serves as the primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events.
期刊最新文献
Absorption vulnerability: A new look at compassion fatigue. Intimate Partner Violence Among Service Members and Veterans: Differences by Sex and Rurality. Differential Indirect Effects of Military Sexual Trauma on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Clusters via Past-Year Intimate Partner Violence Experiences. Parental Descriptions of Childhood Avoidance Symptoms after Trauma. The psychological and emotional impact of unintentional killing: Moral injury in a civilian population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1