Tools for Molecular Genetic Epidemiology: A Comparison of MADGE Methodology with Other Systems

J. Holloway, S. Ye, I. Day
{"title":"Tools for Molecular Genetic Epidemiology: A Comparison of MADGE Methodology with Other Systems","authors":"J. Holloway, S. Ye, I. Day","doi":"10.1080/02648725.2000.10647988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of susceptibility loci for complex genetic diseases has become the focus of much activity in recent years. A key to the successful analysis of these disorders is the analysis of many single nucleotide polymotphisms (SNPs) in extensive population samples to identify DNA variants that are risk factors. As a result, efficient costeffective methods are required for the typing of SNPs. In this review we present an overview of one such method, Microplate-Array Diagonal Gel Electrophoresis (MADGE), and compare it with a number of other methodologies for high throughput SNP typing In disease gene mapping, an essential role is played by the typing of polymorphism between individuals. In the characterization of etiological genetic sites for polygenic disease traits, due to the nature of the genetic contribution to the disease, and thus to the methods of analysis, the number of polymorphic loci needing to be typed is extremely large. Common polymorphism is likely to underpin many common disease susceptibilities. Either guided by linkage studies or by functional hypotheses concerning specific genes, genetic variation in specific genes is examined by association either in family-based or case-control designs (Weeks and Lathrop, 1995). There are two main limitations in the analysis of genetic susceptibility to common disease. The first is that for complex diseases, which have multiple disease-causing","PeriodicalId":8931,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews","volume":"4 1","pages":"71 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2000.10647988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The analysis of susceptibility loci for complex genetic diseases has become the focus of much activity in recent years. A key to the successful analysis of these disorders is the analysis of many single nucleotide polymotphisms (SNPs) in extensive population samples to identify DNA variants that are risk factors. As a result, efficient costeffective methods are required for the typing of SNPs. In this review we present an overview of one such method, Microplate-Array Diagonal Gel Electrophoresis (MADGE), and compare it with a number of other methodologies for high throughput SNP typing In disease gene mapping, an essential role is played by the typing of polymorphism between individuals. In the characterization of etiological genetic sites for polygenic disease traits, due to the nature of the genetic contribution to the disease, and thus to the methods of analysis, the number of polymorphic loci needing to be typed is extremely large. Common polymorphism is likely to underpin many common disease susceptibilities. Either guided by linkage studies or by functional hypotheses concerning specific genes, genetic variation in specific genes is examined by association either in family-based or case-control designs (Weeks and Lathrop, 1995). There are two main limitations in the analysis of genetic susceptibility to common disease. The first is that for complex diseases, which have multiple disease-causing
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分子遗传流行病学的工具:MADGE方法与其他系统的比较
复杂遗传病的易感位点分析是近年来研究的热点。成功分析这些疾病的关键是分析大量人群样本中的许多单核苷酸多态性(snp),以确定作为危险因素的DNA变异。因此,需要高效、经济的方法来进行snp的分型。在这篇综述中,我们介绍了一种这样的方法,微板阵列对角凝胶电泳(MADGE),并将其与许多其他高通量SNP分型方法进行比较。在疾病基因定位中,个体间多态性分型起着至关重要的作用。在对多基因疾病性状的病原遗传位点进行表征时,由于遗传对疾病的贡献性质,以及对分析方法的影响,需要分型的多态性位点数量非常大。常见的多态性可能是许多常见疾病易感性的基础。在连锁研究或关于特定基因的功能假设的指导下,在基于家庭或病例对照设计中,通过关联来检查特定基因的遗传变异(Weeks和Lathrop, 1995)。在分析常见疾病的遗传易感性时,有两个主要的限制。第一种是复杂疾病,有多种病因
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges and opportunities of using immobilized lipase as biosensor Environmental pollution, toxicity profile, and physico-chemical and biotechnological approaches for treatment of textile wastewater Diatoms as a biotechnological resource for the sustainable biofuel production: a state-of-the-art review Road to the future of systems biotechnology: CRISPR-Cas-mediated metabolic engineering for recombinant protein production Biomedical application of plasmid DNA in gene therapy: A new challenge for chromatography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1