Impacts of REDD+ in Mexico: Experiences of Two Local Communities in Campeche

IF 0.1 Q4 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agroindustria Sociedad y Ambiente ASA Pub Date : 2021-11-04 DOI:10.31840/sya.vi24.2387
J. Špirić, Ana Edith Merlo Reyes, María Liliana Ávalos Rodríguez, M. Ramírez
{"title":"Impacts of REDD+ in Mexico: Experiences of Two Local Communities in Campeche","authors":"J. Špirić, Ana Edith Merlo Reyes, María Liliana Ávalos Rodríguez, M. Ramírez","doi":"10.31840/sya.vi24.2387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2010, the Mexican National Forestry Commission (Spanish acronym CONAFOR) implemented REDD+ early action activities in priority states, including Campeche. This article explores the impact of the forestry programs promoted under REDD+ on the diversification of household activities, benefit-sharing among local groups, and forest cover changes in two local communities in Campeche. It examines whether the design and implementation of these programs responded to local aspirations for equity and rural development by combining ethnographic and documental methods. In addition, it quantifies land-cover change (2013-2018) using high-resolution imagery and spatial analysis. It found no intracommunity equity or sustainable activity diversification resulting from the REDD+ implementation. Deforestation for livestock and agricultural mechanization was the dominant process observed both in dense and open forests. Although it has not made the situation worse, REDD+ has yet to provide social benefits for these two communities. To be considered a viable option locally, the program design under REDD+ must combine the implementation of several sustainable productive activities over a longer period and provide net monetary benefits to all local groups.","PeriodicalId":55899,"journal":{"name":"Agroindustria Sociedad y Ambiente ASA","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroindustria Sociedad y Ambiente ASA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31840/sya.vi24.2387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In 2010, the Mexican National Forestry Commission (Spanish acronym CONAFOR) implemented REDD+ early action activities in priority states, including Campeche. This article explores the impact of the forestry programs promoted under REDD+ on the diversification of household activities, benefit-sharing among local groups, and forest cover changes in two local communities in Campeche. It examines whether the design and implementation of these programs responded to local aspirations for equity and rural development by combining ethnographic and documental methods. In addition, it quantifies land-cover change (2013-2018) using high-resolution imagery and spatial analysis. It found no intracommunity equity or sustainable activity diversification resulting from the REDD+ implementation. Deforestation for livestock and agricultural mechanization was the dominant process observed both in dense and open forests. Although it has not made the situation worse, REDD+ has yet to provide social benefits for these two communities. To be considered a viable option locally, the program design under REDD+ must combine the implementation of several sustainable productive activities over a longer period and provide net monetary benefits to all local groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
REDD+在墨西哥的影响:坎佩切州两个地方社区的经验
2010年,墨西哥国家林业委员会(CONAFOR)在包括坎佩切州在内的重点州实施了REDD+早期行动活动。本文探讨了REDD+下推行的林业项目对坎佩切州两个当地社区家庭活动多样化、当地群体利益分享和森林覆盖变化的影响。它考察了这些项目的设计和实施是否通过结合民族志和文献方法回应了当地对公平和农村发展的渴望。此外,它还利用高分辨率图像和空间分析量化了2013-2018年的土地覆盖变化。研究发现,REDD+的实施没有带来社区内部公平或可持续的活动多样化。在茂密和开阔的森林中,为牲畜和农业机械化而砍伐森林是主要的过程。虽然REDD+并没有使情况变得更糟,但它还没有为这两个社区提供社会福利。要在当地被视为可行的选择,REDD+下的方案设计必须在较长时期内结合实施几项可持续生产活动,并为所有当地群体提供净货币效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agroindustria Sociedad y Ambiente ASA
Agroindustria Sociedad y Ambiente ASA AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emociones y emergencia climática: algunas claves para comprender la ecoparálisis La coproducción de servicios ecosistémicos mediante Pago por Servicios Ambientales en una cuenca endorreica en Durango, México Generación de conocimiento sobre biodiversidad en México: un análisis crítico de las trayectorias, retos y oportunidades de los Estudios de Estado Redes alimentarias alternativas: Comientes y sus sentipensamientos para actuar Discursos de sustentabilidad y áreas verdes urbanas: Programa de Certificación de Edificaciones Sustentables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1