Resurrecting the OFR

Hilary J. Allen
{"title":"Resurrecting the OFR","authors":"Hilary J. Allen","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3727585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Office of Financial Research (“OFR”) was created to address the gaps in data availability and analysis that hampered governmental authorities in their response to the financial crisis of 2008. It was hoped that the OFR would serve as a type of “early warning system” that would detect emerging systemic risks through data collection and analysis, but the OFR never had the opportunity to live up to its promise. During the Obama administration, it suffered from an unsupportive Treasury Secretary and pushback from other federal financial regulatory agencies; under the Trump administration, the staff and resources of the OFR have been decimated. The next administration should seize the opportunity to rebuild the OFR – not only to fulfil the OFR’s initial data collection and analysis functions, but also to address new sources of systemic risk that have emerged since 2010. In particular, the OFR should be rebuilt with the new types of expertise needed to address the growing systemic threats that may arise from climate change and fintech innovation. At present, climate, complexity, computer and data science expertise are largely unrepresented in the financial regulatory agencies, but financial regulation – particularly financial stability regulation – can no longer be fully effective without them. A resurrected OFR could serve as a hub of these types of expertise, drawing upon them to monitor new types of systemic risks, research innovative solutions to those risks, and also to assist the other US financial federal regulatory agencies with technical expertise as the need arises.","PeriodicalId":10698,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Law & Finance eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Law & Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3727585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Office of Financial Research (“OFR”) was created to address the gaps in data availability and analysis that hampered governmental authorities in their response to the financial crisis of 2008. It was hoped that the OFR would serve as a type of “early warning system” that would detect emerging systemic risks through data collection and analysis, but the OFR never had the opportunity to live up to its promise. During the Obama administration, it suffered from an unsupportive Treasury Secretary and pushback from other federal financial regulatory agencies; under the Trump administration, the staff and resources of the OFR have been decimated. The next administration should seize the opportunity to rebuild the OFR – not only to fulfil the OFR’s initial data collection and analysis functions, but also to address new sources of systemic risk that have emerged since 2010. In particular, the OFR should be rebuilt with the new types of expertise needed to address the growing systemic threats that may arise from climate change and fintech innovation. At present, climate, complexity, computer and data science expertise are largely unrepresented in the financial regulatory agencies, but financial regulation – particularly financial stability regulation – can no longer be fully effective without them. A resurrected OFR could serve as a hub of these types of expertise, drawing upon them to monitor new types of systemic risks, research innovative solutions to those risks, and also to assist the other US financial federal regulatory agencies with technical expertise as the need arises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复兴OFR
金融研究办公室(“OFR”)的成立是为了解决数据可用性和分析方面的差距,这些差距阻碍了政府当局应对2008年金融危机。人们希望OFR能够作为一种“早期预警系统”,通过数据收集和分析来发现正在出现的系统性风险,但OFR从未有机会兑现其承诺。在奥巴马执政期间,它遭受了不支持的财政部长和其他联邦金融监管机构的阻挠;在特朗普政府的领导下,OFR的人员和资源被大量削减。下一届政府应抓住机会重建OFR——不仅要履行OFR最初的数据收集和分析职能,还要解决2010年以来出现的新系统性风险来源。特别是,OFR应该以应对气候变化和金融科技创新可能带来的日益严重的系统性威胁所需的新型专业知识进行重建。目前,气候、复杂性、计算机和数据科学专业知识在金融监管机构中基本上没有代表,但金融监管——尤其是金融稳定监管——如果没有它们,就无法完全有效。一个复活的OFR可以作为这些类型的专业知识的中心,利用他们来监测新型的系统性风险,研究这些风险的创新解决方案,并在需要时为其他美国金融联邦监管机构提供技术专业知识的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Real Consequences of Macroprudential FX Regulations Will the EU Taxonomy Regulation Foster a Sustainable Corporate Governance? Hedge Fund Management and Pricing Structure around the World Open Access, Interoperability, and the DTCC's Unexpected Path to Monopoly Indirect Investor Protection: The Investment Ecosystem and Its Legal Underpinnings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1