Surviving Repression: The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood after the 2013 Coup By Lucia Ardovini. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2022. 168 pp., £ 80.00, cloth, ISBN 978-1-5261-4929-9.

IF 1.3 1区 哲学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics and Religion Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1017/S1755048322000359
E. Biagini
{"title":"Surviving Repression: The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood after the 2013 Coup By Lucia Ardovini. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2022. 168 pp., £ 80.00, cloth, ISBN 978-1-5261-4929-9.","authors":"E. Biagini","doi":"10.1017/S1755048322000359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the dignitary harm in being told that following your faith is illegal is also real, and like Koppelman, I think that in much of America today, businesses would lose customers if they chose to post such signs. Gill “accedes to narrow exemptions” if they are limited to “a small number” of providers (185), and Koppelman’s proposed compromise might well make the numbers of shops refusing service less, not more common. Or, admittedly, it might not. The furious militancy of many contemporary American religious traditionalists may prove too incendiary to be cooled by compromises. It may be wiser to pursue policies of Lockean formal neutrality almost exclusively, which was, ironically, the stance of both 19th century American law and the late Justice Antonin Scalia, even though today’s conservative justices berate it as novel liberal imperialism. The issues Emily Gill addresses are genuinely difficult and genuinely urgent, and all who seek answers to them can benefit greatly from her conscientious and insightful reflections.","PeriodicalId":45674,"journal":{"name":"Politics and Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048322000359","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the dignitary harm in being told that following your faith is illegal is also real, and like Koppelman, I think that in much of America today, businesses would lose customers if they chose to post such signs. Gill “accedes to narrow exemptions” if they are limited to “a small number” of providers (185), and Koppelman’s proposed compromise might well make the numbers of shops refusing service less, not more common. Or, admittedly, it might not. The furious militancy of many contemporary American religious traditionalists may prove too incendiary to be cooled by compromises. It may be wiser to pursue policies of Lockean formal neutrality almost exclusively, which was, ironically, the stance of both 19th century American law and the late Justice Antonin Scalia, even though today’s conservative justices berate it as novel liberal imperialism. The issues Emily Gill addresses are genuinely difficult and genuinely urgent, and all who seek answers to them can benefit greatly from her conscientious and insightful reflections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《幸存的镇压:2013年政变后的埃及穆斯林兄弟会》作者:Lucia Ardovini。曼彻斯特:曼彻斯特大学出版社,2022。168页,80.00英镑,布面,ISBN 978-1-5261-4929-9。
被告知追随自己的信仰是非法的,这种有损尊严的伤害也是真实存在的。和科佩尔曼一样,我认为,在今天的美国,很多企业如果选择张贴这样的标志,就会失去客户。吉尔“同意狭隘的豁免”,如果他们仅限于“少数”供应商(185),而科佩尔曼提出的妥协可能会使拒绝服务的商店数量减少,而不是更普遍。或者,不可否认,它可能不会。许多当代美国宗教传统主义者的激烈战斗可能会被证明过于煽动性,无法通过妥协来冷却。或许更明智的做法是,几乎完全奉行洛克式的形式中立政策,具有讽刺意味的是,这正是19世纪美国法律和已故大法官安东宁·斯卡利亚(Antonin Scalia)的立场,尽管今天的保守派大法官将其斥责为新颖的自由帝国主义。艾米丽·吉尔提出的问题是真正的困难和紧迫,所有寻求答案的人都能从她认真而深刻的反思中受益匪浅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Politics and Religion is an international journal publishing high quality peer-reviewed research on the multifaceted relationship between religion and politics around the world. The scope of published work is intentionally broad and we invite innovative work from all methodological approaches in the major subfields of political science, including international relations, American politics, comparative politics, and political theory, that seeks to improve our understanding of religion’s role in some aspect of world politics. The Editors invite normative and empirical investigations of the public representation of religion, the religious and political institutions that shape religious presence in the public square, and the role of religion in shaping citizenship, broadly considered, as well as pieces that attempt to advance our methodological tools for examining religious influence in political life.
期刊最新文献
Religion, spirituality, and susceptibility to conspiracy theories: examining the role of analytic thinking and post-critical beliefs A colorblind Christian country? How racial attitudes affect support for Christian nationalism and civil religion Was there an enthusiasm gap? Examining support for Donald Trump among evangelicals and nonevangelicals Neutralizing the sacred space: pre-election messages in a typical Indonesian city Fighting against assisted dying in Spain: catholic-inspired civic mobilization during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1