Additional evidence on the final break between Moscow and Tirana in 1960-1961

Andrey B. Edemskiy
{"title":"Additional evidence on the final break between Moscow and Tirana in 1960-1961","authors":"Andrey B. Edemskiy","doi":"10.2298/balc1950375e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disagreement between Khrushchev and Enver Hoxha, leaders of the Soviet Union and Albania, had been ripening since the mid-1950s. Until the spring of 1960 the leadership of the small country did not show readiness to challenge the Soviets perceived as the great power at the head of Socialist bloc countries and the world Communist movement. But when the Chinese leadership indicated their disagreements with official Moscow in the spring of 1960, Albania joined them without fearing the inevitability of open confrontation with the Soviets. The article reveals the further course of events in chronological order during the deepening rift between the two leaders and their entourage, and analyses the Soviet decision-making process at the highest level consulting newly-declassified documents from the Russian State Archives of Contemporary History in Moscow. By the end of 1961, within less than two years, relations between the Soviet Union and Albania sank to their lowest. The Soviet leadership, presumably Khrushchev himself, failed in their attempts to stop another growing conflict in the Soviet bloc by discussing controversial issues face to face with the Albanian leadership. Researchers have already accumulated considerable knowledge about these processes, but substantial gaps are yet to be filled. Many relevant Soviet documents from Russian archives are not yet declassified. Nevertheless, the already available ones allow researchers to take a broader look on the developing Soviet-Albanian rift and to establish how, in parallel with the collapse of Soviet-Albanian connections in the early 1960s, Soviet-Yugoslav contacts intensified.","PeriodicalId":80613,"journal":{"name":"Balcanica (Rome, Italy)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balcanica (Rome, Italy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/balc1950375e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disagreement between Khrushchev and Enver Hoxha, leaders of the Soviet Union and Albania, had been ripening since the mid-1950s. Until the spring of 1960 the leadership of the small country did not show readiness to challenge the Soviets perceived as the great power at the head of Socialist bloc countries and the world Communist movement. But when the Chinese leadership indicated their disagreements with official Moscow in the spring of 1960, Albania joined them without fearing the inevitability of open confrontation with the Soviets. The article reveals the further course of events in chronological order during the deepening rift between the two leaders and their entourage, and analyses the Soviet decision-making process at the highest level consulting newly-declassified documents from the Russian State Archives of Contemporary History in Moscow. By the end of 1961, within less than two years, relations between the Soviet Union and Albania sank to their lowest. The Soviet leadership, presumably Khrushchev himself, failed in their attempts to stop another growing conflict in the Soviet bloc by discussing controversial issues face to face with the Albanian leadership. Researchers have already accumulated considerable knowledge about these processes, but substantial gaps are yet to be filled. Many relevant Soviet documents from Russian archives are not yet declassified. Nevertheless, the already available ones allow researchers to take a broader look on the developing Soviet-Albanian rift and to establish how, in parallel with the collapse of Soviet-Albanian connections in the early 1960s, Soviet-Yugoslav contacts intensified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于1960-1961年莫斯科和地拉那最后决裂的额外证据
赫鲁晓夫和前苏联和阿尔巴尼亚领导人恩维尔·霍查之间的分歧从20世纪50年代中期就开始成熟。直到1960年春天,这个小国的领导人还没有表现出准备挑战被视为社会主义集团国家和世界共产主义运动领袖的大国苏联。但是,当中国领导人在1960年春天表明他们与莫斯科官方的分歧时,阿尔巴尼亚加入了他们的行列,并不担心与苏联的公开对抗是不可避免的。这篇文章按照时间顺序揭示了在两位领导人及其随行人员之间日益加深的裂痕期间事件的进一步发展过程,并参考了莫斯科俄罗斯国家近代史档案馆最新解密的文件,分析了苏联最高层的决策过程。到1961年底,在不到两年的时间里,苏联和阿尔巴尼亚之间的关系降到了最低点。苏联领导人,大概是赫鲁晓夫本人,未能通过与阿尔巴尼亚领导人面对面讨论有争议的问题来阻止苏联集团内部另一场日益激烈的冲突。研究人员已经积累了关于这些过程的相当多的知识,但实质性的空白尚未填补。俄罗斯档案中的许多苏联相关文件尚未解密。然而,已有的资料使研究人员能够更广泛地观察苏阿关系的裂痕,并确定在20世纪60年代初苏阿关系破裂的同时,苏南关系是如何加强的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Italy in the writings of Slobodan Jovanovic The second eastern crisis (1875-1878): Echoes, volunteers and Italian interests Three votive plaques from Upper Moesia Experiencing disease and medical treatment in renaissance Italy: Cardinal Pietro Bembo and his circle The Yugoslav perspective on Italian Eurocommunism in the second half of the 1970s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1