Transfer of training through productive networking

Asif Ali Rahman
{"title":"Transfer of training through productive networking","authors":"Asif Ali Rahman","doi":"10.35692/07183992.15.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \n Developing strategies for successfully transferring knowledge, skills and attitudes from a training programme to the workplace continues to be a key challenge facing organisations. Studies have found that, in general, employees transfer less than 10% of the training they acquire to their workplaces (Georgenson, 1982; Kelly, 1982; McGuire, 2014). Fitzpatrick (2001) and Saks (2002) argue that research regarding transfer of training could be complex because the figure of 10% has never been proven scientifically. Based on this study, we propose that the transfer of training models limit the transfer process because they focus solely on the whys and the why nots of the 10%, limiting the discussion to only the transfer of knowledge, skills, and attitudes from a training programme to a job. We contend that if the transfer of training research and discussion is broadened to include the remaining 90%, which is viewed as a lost job efficiency, one might discover some additional determinants contributing to the transfer of training. Therefore, this study is based on a new determinant called productive networking. In the study, interviews were used as a research instrument to investigate the significance of productive networking in the transfer of training process. Two bodies of literature were reviewed for the study. They were the frameworks of the transfer process set forth by Baldwin and Ford (1988) and Holton (2008), and the theories that support training transfer in organisations. The study determined that productive networking among trainees was a critical factor in the successful transfer of training. ","PeriodicalId":34468,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Business Review","volume":"59 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35692/07183992.15.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   Developing strategies for successfully transferring knowledge, skills and attitudes from a training programme to the workplace continues to be a key challenge facing organisations. Studies have found that, in general, employees transfer less than 10% of the training they acquire to their workplaces (Georgenson, 1982; Kelly, 1982; McGuire, 2014). Fitzpatrick (2001) and Saks (2002) argue that research regarding transfer of training could be complex because the figure of 10% has never been proven scientifically. Based on this study, we propose that the transfer of training models limit the transfer process because they focus solely on the whys and the why nots of the 10%, limiting the discussion to only the transfer of knowledge, skills, and attitudes from a training programme to a job. We contend that if the transfer of training research and discussion is broadened to include the remaining 90%, which is viewed as a lost job efficiency, one might discover some additional determinants contributing to the transfer of training. Therefore, this study is based on a new determinant called productive networking. In the study, interviews were used as a research instrument to investigate the significance of productive networking in the transfer of training process. Two bodies of literature were reviewed for the study. They were the frameworks of the transfer process set forth by Baldwin and Ford (1988) and Holton (2008), and the theories that support training transfer in organisations. The study determined that productive networking among trainees was a critical factor in the successful transfer of training. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过有效的网络转移培训
制定策略,成功地将知识、技能和态度从培训计划转移到工作场所,仍然是组织面临的主要挑战。研究发现,一般来说,员工将他们获得的培训转移到工作场所的比例不到10% (Georgenson, 1982;凯利,1982;McGuire, 2014)。Fitzpatrick(2001)和Saks(2002)认为,关于训练转移的研究可能很复杂,因为10%的数字从未得到科学证明。基于这项研究,我们提出,培训迁移模型限制了迁移过程,因为它们只关注10%的“为什么”和“为什么不”,将讨论仅限于从培训计划到工作的知识、技能和态度的迁移。我们认为,如果将培训转移的研究和讨论扩大到包括剩余的90%,这被视为失去的工作效率,人们可能会发现一些额外的决定因素有助于培训转移。因此,这项研究是基于一个新的决定因素,称为生产性网络。在本研究中,访谈作为一种研究工具来调查生产性网络在培训转移过程中的意义。本研究回顾了两组文献。它们是Baldwin和Ford(1988)以及Holton(2008)提出的迁移过程框架,以及支持组织培训迁移的理论。这项研究确定受训人员之间富有成效的联系是成功转移培训的一个关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
El empoderamiento femenino a través del emprendimiento en la era digital Héctor y el Norte Elicitation Study Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour that analyses the intention to Adopt Electronic Commerce in the Elderly Fortalecimiento de micronegocios como motor de reactivación económica y estrategia de formación profesional 12 tips to create good titles for your manuscripts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1