Popularization or occlusion of truth in the Platonic myths: Plutarch, Numenius, and Maximus of Tyre

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 CLASSICS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1093/bics/qbad007
Collin Miles Hilton
{"title":"Popularization or occlusion of truth in the Platonic myths: Plutarch, Numenius, and Maximus of Tyre","authors":"Collin Miles Hilton","doi":"10.1093/bics/qbad007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Why does Plato critique traditional myth so vehemently in the Republic, yet compose his own imagistic narratives in the very same dialogue? In this chapter, I examine the responses of Plutarch, Numenius, and Maximus of Tyre. Plutarch defends the use of myth on the grounds that it opens up philosophy for a wider audience, if taught carefully, while Numenius argues that it piously hides the truth from the uninitiated. Maximus draws on both lines of argument. Defending Plato’s corpus, particularly against Epicureans, led the Platonists of the early Empire to speculate on questions of hermeneutics and literary theory.","PeriodicalId":43661,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bics/qbad007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why does Plato critique traditional myth so vehemently in the Republic, yet compose his own imagistic narratives in the very same dialogue? In this chapter, I examine the responses of Plutarch, Numenius, and Maximus of Tyre. Plutarch defends the use of myth on the grounds that it opens up philosophy for a wider audience, if taught carefully, while Numenius argues that it piously hides the truth from the uninitiated. Maximus draws on both lines of argument. Defending Plato’s corpus, particularly against Epicureans, led the Platonists of the early Empire to speculate on questions of hermeneutics and literary theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柏拉图神话中真理的普及或闭塞:普鲁塔克、努曼纽斯和提尔的马克西姆斯
为什么柏拉图在《理想国》中如此激烈地批判传统神话,却在同样的对话中写出自己的意象叙事?在本章中,我考察了普鲁塔克、努曼纽斯和提尔的马克西姆斯的回答。普鲁塔克为神话的使用辩护,理由是它为更广泛的读者打开了哲学的大门,如果仔细教导的话,而努曼纽斯则认为它虔诚地向外行人隐藏了真相。马克西姆斯借鉴了这两种观点。为了捍卫柏拉图的语料库,特别是反对伊壁鸠鲁学派,早期帝国的柏拉图主义者开始思考解释学和文学理论的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A tale of two Octavias: historical empathy and intimate partner ‘violence’ The abuse of aged parents in the ancient Roman world ‘Start with the cage’: coercive control and the Roman husband The farmer wants a wife: ecofeminism, domestic violence, and coercive control in Roman agricultural writing The princeps investigates: two cases of domestic violence in Tacitus’ Annals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1