Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, nutritional Practice and physical activity and its relation with quality of life in patients with breast cancer

N. Abdous, P. NazarAli, A. Ramezankhani, F. Fallah
{"title":"Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, nutritional Practice and physical activity and its relation with quality of life in patients with breast cancer","authors":"N. Abdous, P. NazarAli, A. Ramezankhani, F. Fallah","doi":"10.18502/bccr.v13i1.8832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between nutritional knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) and physical activity (PA) on the quality of life (QOL) in women with breast cancer (BC). \nMethods: This cross-sectional study involved all women with BC who referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran during the years 2018-2019 that by using Cochran formula, 220 of them were selected by convenience sampling and answered the questionnaire including Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), Nutritional Knowledge, Attitude, Practice Survey (KAP) and Quality of life Questionnaire for breast cancer patients (QLQ-30). To determine the share of nutritional variables and physical activity (PA) in predicting QOL, standard multiple regression was used by SPSS 22 software. \nResults: The findings of the study showed that the BC patients’ PA (109.61±110.831), QOL (49.805±16.830) and KAP (K= 46.028±11.879; A=45.540±19.754; P=46.870±12.362) were not in a good condition.The best functional outcomes of QLQ-30 questionnaire were found for social functioning (73.560±26.873) and role functioning (73.560±26.873) subscales whereas emotional functioning was found lowest (58.257±24.298).Also, the results showed thatNutrition-RelatedKnowledge (β=144; P=0.036), Attitudes (β=160; P=0.038), and Practice (β=0.596; P=0.045) and PA (β=0.042; P=0.001) were significant factorsinpredictingcancer patients’ quality of life. \nConclusion: The study showed that active patients have a good QOL, also, right nutritional choices and performance by the patients can result in better quality of life, therefore, the patients should receive special interventions at this time.","PeriodicalId":8706,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/bccr.v13i1.8832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between nutritional knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) and physical activity (PA) on the quality of life (QOL) in women with breast cancer (BC). Methods: This cross-sectional study involved all women with BC who referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran during the years 2018-2019 that by using Cochran formula, 220 of them were selected by convenience sampling and answered the questionnaire including Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), Nutritional Knowledge, Attitude, Practice Survey (KAP) and Quality of life Questionnaire for breast cancer patients (QLQ-30). To determine the share of nutritional variables and physical activity (PA) in predicting QOL, standard multiple regression was used by SPSS 22 software. Results: The findings of the study showed that the BC patients’ PA (109.61±110.831), QOL (49.805±16.830) and KAP (K= 46.028±11.879; A=45.540±19.754; P=46.870±12.362) were not in a good condition.The best functional outcomes of QLQ-30 questionnaire were found for social functioning (73.560±26.873) and role functioning (73.560±26.873) subscales whereas emotional functioning was found lowest (58.257±24.298).Also, the results showed thatNutrition-RelatedKnowledge (β=144; P=0.036), Attitudes (β=160; P=0.038), and Practice (β=0.596; P=0.045) and PA (β=0.042; P=0.001) were significant factorsinpredictingcancer patients’ quality of life. Conclusion: The study showed that active patients have a good QOL, also, right nutritional choices and performance by the patients can result in better quality of life, therefore, the patients should receive special interventions at this time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌患者的知识、态度、营养实践和身体活动的评估及其与生活质量的关系
背景:本研究的目的是评估营养知识、态度和实践(KAP)和身体活动(PA)与乳腺癌(BC)妇女生活质量(QOL)的相关性。方法:对2018-2019年在德黑兰伊玛目霍梅尼医院就诊的所有BC女性患者进行横断面研究,采用Cochran公式,采用方便抽样法抽取220例,填写乳腺癌患者全球身体活动问卷(GPAQ)、营养知识、态度、行为调查(KAP)和生活质量问卷(QLQ-30)。为了确定营养变量和体力活动(PA)在预测生活质量中的份额,采用SPSS 22软件进行标准多元回归。结果:本组BC患者PA(109.61±110.831)、QOL(49.805±16.830)、KAP (K= 46.028±11.879;一个= 45.540±19.754;P=46.870±12.362)。其中,社会功能(73.560±26.873)和角色功能(73.560±26.873)分量表得分最高,情绪功能(58.257±24.298)分量表得分最低。营养相关知识(nutrition - relatedknowledge) (β=144;P=0.036),态度(β=160;P=0.038), Practice (β=0.596;P=0.045)和PA (β=0.042;P=0.001)是预测癌症患者生活质量的重要因素。结论:积极运动的患者有较好的生活质量,正确的营养选择和患者的表现可以提高患者的生活质量,因此此时应对患者进行特殊干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Ursodeoxycholic acid and N-acetyl cysteine on Lymphoblast Viability Cross-Reacting Material 197, a Specific Inhibitor of HB-EGF, and Its Anticancer Effects Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in a Young Man with Unusual Presentation of Weight Loss, Bone Pain, and Abdominal Pain Effects of Gold Nanoparticles on Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer Cancer has an Independent Association with Death in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Single-center Study in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1